Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera with Ultrasound Pachymetry and Noncontact Specular Microscopy in Measuring Central Corneal Thickness

REFERENCES

• Emara B, Probst L E, Tingey D P, et al. Correlation of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in normal myopic eyes and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 1320–1325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price F W, Jr., Koller D L, Price M O. Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2216–2220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitacre M M, Stein R A, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115: 592–596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herndon L W, Choudhri S A, Cox T, et al. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 1137–1141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salz J J, Azen S P, Berstein J, et al. Evaluation and comparison of sources of variability in the measurement of corneal thickness with ultrasonic and optical pachymeters. Ophthalmic Surg 1983; 14: 750–754
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsich M W, Bullimore M A. The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea 2000; 19: 792–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giasson C, Forthomme D. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements between optical and ultrasound pachometers. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 236–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper C L, Boulton M E, Bennett D, et al. Diurnal variations in human corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 1068–1072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Oshika T, Oki K, et al. Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1313–1318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitzenberger C K, Baumgartner A, Drexler W, Fercher A F. Interferometric measurement of corneal thickness with micrometer precision. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 118: 468–476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaloy J, Vidal M T, Villada J R, et al. Comparison of four corneal pachymetry techniques in corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2004; 20: 29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong A C, Wong C C, Yuen N S, Hui S P. Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry. Eye 2002; 16: 715–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmen J B, Ekesten B, Lundgren B. Anterior chamber depth estimation by Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001; 79: 576–579
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Donnell C, Maldonado-Codina C. Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the OCULUS Pentacam. Cornea. 2005; 24: 920–924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucakhan O O, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32: 970–977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehl W, Stojanac D, Sacu S, et al. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 7–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 892–899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 937–941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 1729–1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen J, Hjortdal J O, Ehlers N, et al. A clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry. Acta Ophthalmol 1991; 69: 659–663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Huang A J, Pflugfelder S C. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 774–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbuehi K C, Almubrad T M. Limits of agreement between the optical pachymeter and a noncontact specular microscope. Cornea 2005; 24: 545–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Módis L, Jr., Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Corneal thickness measurements with contact and noncontact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 517–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Módis L, Jr., Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Scanning-slit and specular microscopic pachymetry in comparison with ultrasonic determination of corneal thickness. Cornea 2001; 20: 711–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol. 1975; 53: 34–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonnu P A, Ho T, Newson T, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89: 851–854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957; 134: 221–242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cennamo G, Rosa N, La Rana A, et al. Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica 1997; 211: 341–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Shah S, Bessant D A, et al. Reduction in intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Correlation with pretreatment myopia. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 355–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon G, Small R H, Ren Q, Parel J M. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 1993; 9: 110–117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimmyo M, Ross A J, Moy A, Mostafavi R. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 603–613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko Y C, Liu C J, Hsu W M. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers. Eye 2005; 19: 327–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster P J, Wong J S, Wong E, et al. Accuracy of clinical estimates of intraocular pressure in Chinese eyes. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1816–1821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 85–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemesure B, Wu S Y, Hennis A, Leske M C. Barbados Eye Study Group. Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in the Barbados eye studies. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 240–244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Araie M. Corneal thickness in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112: 1327–1336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar