Long-Term Refractive Results of Elliptical Excimer Laser Penetrating Keratoplasty (EELPK)

REFERENCES

• Castroviejo R, Hollwich F. Keratoplastik. Thieme, Stuttgart 1968; 26
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz K, Schreiber W, Behrens-Baumann W. Excimer laser “corneal shaping:” a new technique for customized trephination in penetrating keratoplasty. First experimental results in rabbits. Graefes Atch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003; 241: 423–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz K, Behrens-Baumann W. Penetrating keratoplasty in free form using the excimer laser—first application in a patient. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2003; 220: 247–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang G K, Schröder E, Koch J W, Yanoff M, Naumann G O. Excimer laser keratoplasty. Part 2: Elliptical keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg 1989; 20: 342–346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lang G K, Naumann G O, Koch J W. A new elliptical excision for corneal transplantation using an excimer laser. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 914–915
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naumann G OH, Seitz B, Lang G K, Langenbucher A, Kus M M. Excimer-laser-193 nm trepanation bei der perforierenden keratoplastik. Bericht über die ersten 70 patienten [193 excimer laser trepanation in perforating keratoplasty. Report of 70 patients]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993; 203: 252–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus M M, Kuchle M, Naumann G O. Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1156–1165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen N X, Kus M M, Kuchle M, Naumann G O. Ergebnisse der ersten 1000 konsekutiven elektiven nichtmechanischen keratoplastiken mit dem excimerlaser—eine studie über mehr als 12 jahre [Results of the first 1,000 consecutive elective nonmechanical keratoplasties using the excimer laser. A prospective study over more than 12 years]. Ophthalmologe 2004; 101: 478–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson S E, Klyce S D. Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography: a clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 349–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Computerized calculation scheme for bitoric eikonic intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics 2003; 23: 213–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Computerized calculation scheme for toric intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004; 82: 270–276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Zagrada D, Budde W, Kus M M. Hornhautdimensionen bei verschiedenen hornhautdystrophien und ihre bedeutung für die perforierende keratoplastik [Corneal dimensions in various types of corneal dystrophies and their effect on penetrating keratoplasty]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2000; 217: 152–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price F W, Jr., Whitson W E, Johns S, Gonzales J S. Risk factors of corneal graft failure. J Refract Surg 1996; 12: 134–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troutman R C. Astigmatic considerations in corneal graft. Ophthalmic Surg 1979; 10: 21–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppenreijs V PT, van Rij G, Beekhuis W H, Rijneveld W J, Rinkel-van Driel E. Causes of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Doc Ophthalmol. 1993; 85: 21–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson R J. Modulation of postkeratoplasty astigmatism by surgical and suturing techniques. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1983; 23: 137–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Küchle M, Naumann G OH. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2162–2167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Kus M M, Naumann G O. Transplantatverkippung nach perforierender keratoplastik—vergleich zwischen nichtmechanischer trepanation mittels excimerlaser und motortrepanation. [Transplant vertical tilt after perforating keratoplasty—comparison between non-mechanical trepanation with excimer laser and motor trepanation]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1998; 212: 129–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Kus M M, Naumann G O. Zernike representation of corneal topography height data after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 582–591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villacriz E, Rife L, Smith R E. Oval host wounds and postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Cornea 1987; 6: 181–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman D M, Troutman R C. The theory of “other than round” cornea transplantation. Refract Corneal Surg 1992; 8: 97–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pallikaris I. Die präoperative Placidophotographie bei Keratokonus und ihre Bedeutung im Zusammenhang mit dem postoperativen Astigmatismus [Preoperative placido photography in keratoconus and its meaning in conjunction with postoperative astigmatism]. Albrecht v. Graefes, Arch Klin Exp. Ophthalmol. 1980; 213: 87–99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naumann G OH. Corneal transplantation in anterior segment diseases. The Bowman lecture. (Number II) Part II. Eye 1995; 9: 395–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assil K K, Zarnegar S R, Schanzin D J. Visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty with double continuous or combined interrupted and continuous suture wound closure. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 114: 63–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatov V, Steinert R F, Talamo J H. Postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or interrupted sutures. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115: 715–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas J B, Heyer C, Budde W M. Effect of single- and double-running sutures on corneal astigmatism and suture loosening after PKP. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1709–1710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin D TC, Wilson S E, Reidy J J, Klyce S D, McDonald M B, Insler M S, Kaufman H E. Topographic changes that occur with 10-0 running suture removal following penetrating keratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg 1990; 6: 21–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar