Structure–Function Relationship between Flicker-Defined Form Perimetry and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Suspects

References

• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas GR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. A correlation of fields and discs in open angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 1974;9:391–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:62–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:741–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Alanko HI. Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:206–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanson WH, Felius J, Pan F. Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:466–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilforushan N, Nassiri N, Moghimi S, Law SK, Giaconi J, Coleman AL, et al. Structure-function relationships between spectral-domain OCT and standard achromatic perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:2740–2748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Lisboa R, Weinreb RN, Girkin CA, Liebmann JM, Zangwill LM. A combined index of structure and function for staging glaucomatous damage. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:E1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirooka K, Manabe S, Tenkumo K, Nitta E, Sato S, Tsujikawa A. Use of the structure-function relationship in detecting glaucoma progression in early glaucoma. BMC ophthalmology 2014;14:118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiri N, Nilforushan N, Coleman AL, Law SK, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K. Longitudinal structure-function relationships with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and standard achromatic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:826–832.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL, Aydin A, Stark PC, Hertzmark E, et al. Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:464–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Liu S, Ye C, Lai G, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a comparison between the fast and the regular retinal nerve fiber layer scans. Ophthalmology 2011;118:763–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:413–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goren D, Flanagan JG. Is flicker-defined form (FDF) dependent on the contour? J Vis 2008;8:15 11–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaid PT, Flanagan JG. Defining the limits of flicker defined form: effect of stimulus size, eccentricity and number of random dots. Vision Res 2005;45:1075–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamparter J, Schulze A, Schuff AC, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM. Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:1057–1064 e1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn FK, Kremers J, Mardin CY, Junemann AG, Adler W, Tornow RP. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;253:447–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznicek L, Lamparter J, Vogel M, Kampik A, Hirneiss C. Flicker Defined Form Perimetry in Glaucoma Suspects with Normal Achromatic Visual Fields. Curr Eye Res 2015;40:683–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1684–1689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malik R, Swanson WH, Garway-Heath DF. ‘Structure-function relationship’ in glaucoma: past thinking and current concepts. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40:369–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1809–1815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Kardon RH. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3662–3668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglior S, Riva I, Guareschi M, Di Matteo F, Romanazzi F, Buffagni L, et al. Retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:733–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, Tavares IM, Hoffmann EM, Bourne RR, et al. Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2889–2895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Anderson DR, Levine RA, Fan J, Cello KE, et al. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1603–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, Cunha-Vaz J, Torri V, Adamsons I. Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:366–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007;26:688–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL, 3rd, Barnes G, Holt WF, Crawford ML. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3152–3160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasdo N, Millican CL, Katholi CR, Curcio CA. The length of Henle fibers in the human retina and a model of ganglion receptive field density in the visual field. Vision Res 2007;47:2901–2911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpin A, Sampson GP, McKendrick AM. Combining ganglion cell topology and data of patients with glaucoma to determine a structure-function map. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3249–3256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson WH, Horner DG. Assessing assumptions of a combined structure-function index. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015;35:186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danthurebandara VM, Sharpe GP, Hutchison DM, Denniss J, Nicolela MT, McKendrick AM, et al. Enhanced structure-function relationship in glaucoma with an anatomically and geometrically accurate neuroretinal rim measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu R, Marin-Franch I, Racette L. Prediction accuracy of a novel dynamic structure-function model for glaucoma progression. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2014;55:8086–8094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn FK, Tornow RP, Junemann AG, Laemmer R, Kremers J. Perimetric measurements with flicker-defined form stimulation in comparison with conventional perimetry and retinal nerve fiber measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:2317–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannheim F. [Flicker and conventional perimetry in comparison with structural changes in glaucoma]. Ophthalmologe 2013;110:131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichhpujani P, Lo DC, Cvintal V, Waisbourd M, Averbuch A, Leiby BE, et al. Flicker defined form, standard perimetry and Heidelberg retinal tomography: Structure-function relationships. Can J Ophthalmol 2015;50:290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer KA, van der Schoot J, Lemij HG, de Boer JF. RPE-normalized RNFL attenuation coefficient maps derived from volumetric OCT imaging for glaucoma assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:6102–6108.
   Google Scholar
• Leaney J, Healey PR, Lee M, Graham SL. Correlation of structural RNFL parameters and functional measures using HRT3 and Spectralis SD-OCT at different levels of glaucoma severity. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40:802–812.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler S, Sturmer J. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter(R) on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2012;229:319–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denniss J, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. An anatomically customizable computational model relating the visual field to the optic nerve head in individual eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:6981–6990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar