275
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Corneal Densitometry after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 605-610 | Received 24 Jul 2017, Accepted 14 Jan 2018, Published online: 14 Mar 2018

References

  • Yang E, Roberts CJ, Mehta JS. A review of corneal biomechanics after LASIK and SMILE and the current methods of corneal biomechanical analysis. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;06. doi:10.4172/2155-9570.
  • Zhang L, Wang Y. The shape of posterior corneal surface in normal, post-LASIK, and post–epi-LASIK Eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3468–75. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4811.
  • Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2012;13:75. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-75.
  • Aristeidou A, Taniguchi EV, Tsatsos M, Muller R, McAlinden C, Pineda R, Paschalis EI. The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis. 2015;2. doi:10.1186/s40662-015-0022-6.
  • Moshirfar M, Gardiner JP, Schliesser JA, Espandar L, Feiz V, Mifflin MD, Chang JC. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1925–33. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.027.
  • Wang B, Zhang Z, Naidu RK, Chu R, Dai J, Qu X, Yu Z, Zhou H. Comparison of the change in posterior corneal elevation and corneal biomechanical parameters after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia correction. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39:191–96. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2016.01.007.
  • Li M, Zhao J, Shen Y, Li T, He L, Xu H, Yu Y, Zhou X. Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for Myopia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:777–79.
  • Romero-Diaz-de-Leon L, Serna-Ojeda JC, Navas A, Graue-Hernández EO, Ramirez-Miranda A. Intraoperative flap complications in LASIK surgery performed by ophthalmology residents. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11:263–67. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.188393.
  • Ivarsen A, Næser K, Hjortdal J. Laser in situ keratomileusis for high astigmatism in myopic and hyperopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:74–80. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.054.
  • Villa C, Gutiérrez R, Jiménez JR, González‐Méijome JM. Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1031–37. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.110874.
  • Chansue E, Tanehsakdi M, Swasdibutra S, McAlinden C. Efficacy, predictability and safety of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Eye Vis. 2015;2:14–20.
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis. 2014;1. doi:10.1186/s40662-014-0003-1.
  • Lee JK, Chuck RS, Park CY. Femtosecond laser refractive surgery: small-incision lenticule extraction vs. femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:260–64. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000158.
  • Shen Z, Shi K, Yu Y, Yu X, Lin Y, Yao K. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:158–76.
  • Li M, Niu L, Qin B, Zhou Z, Ni K, Le Q, Xiang J, Wei A, Ma W, Zhou X. Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). PloS One. 2013;8:e81435. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081435.
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Bartoli E. Corneal sensitivity after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1580–87. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.055.
  • Dhubhghaill SN, Rozema JJ, Jongenelen S, Hidalgo IR, Zakaria N, Tassignon M-J. Normative values for corneal densitometry analysis by scheimpflug optical assessmentcorneal densitometry in the normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:162–68. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13236.
  • Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SPS. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:341–47. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.33819.
  • Minami K, Honbo M, Mori Y, Kataoka Y, Miyata K. Area densitometry using rotating Scheimpflug photography for posterior capsule opacification and surface light scattering analyses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2444–49. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.038.
  • Fares U, Otri AM, Al-Aqaba MA, Faraj L, Dua HS. Wavefront-optimized excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism: refractive outcomes and corneal densitometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:2131–38. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.041.
  • Savini G, Huang J, Lombardo M, Serrao S, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Venanzio S, Ducoli P. Objective monitoring of corneal backward light scattering after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995. 2016;32:20–25.
  • Han T, Zhao J, Shen Y, Chen Y, Tian M, Zhou X. A three-year observation of corneal backscatter after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995. 2017;33:377–82.
  • Agca A, Ozgurhan EB, Yildirim Y, Cankaya KI, Guleryuz NB, Alkin Z, Ozkaya A, Demirok A, Yilmaz OF. Corneal backscatter analysis by in vivo confocal microscopy: fellow eye comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:e265012.
  • Ağca A, Demirok A, Çankaya Kİ, Yaşa D, Demircan A, Yıldırım Y, Özkaya A, Yılmaz ÖF. Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:292–96. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2014.03.001.
  • Kim JR, Hwang HB, Mun SJ, Chung YT, Kim HS. Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-14-117.
  • Gyldenkerne A, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal JØ. Assessing the corneal power change after refractive surgery using Scheimpflug imaging. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35:299–307. doi:10.1111/opo.2015.35.issue-3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.