238
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Visual Function

Random Changes of Accommodation Stimuli: An Automated Extension of the Flippers Accommodative Facility Test

, , , , &
Pages 788-795 | Received 31 Oct 2017, Accepted 04 Feb 2018, Published online: 28 Feb 2018

References

  • Zellers J, Alpert T, Rouse M. A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Am Optom Assoc. 1984;55:31–37.
  • Scheiman M, Herzberg H, Frantz K, Margolies M. Normative study of accommodative facility in elementary schoolchildren. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65:127–34.
  • Siderov J, DiGuglielmo L. Binocular accommodative facility in prepresbyopic adults and its relation to symptoms. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68(1):49–53.
  • Thiagarajan P, Ciuffreda KJ. Visual fatigue and accommodative dynamics in asymptomatic individuals. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(1):57–65.
  • Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocular vision. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
  • Sanàbria F, Díaz-Doutón F, Aldaba M, Pujol J. Spherical refractive correction with an electro-optical liquid lens in a double-pass system. J Eur Opt Soc. 2013;8:7–10.
  • Radhakrishnan H, Allen PM, Charman WN. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(9):4375–82.
  • Krishnan V, Phillips S, Stark L. Frequency analysis of accommodation, accommodative vergence and disparity vergence. Vision Res. 1973;13:1545–54.
  • Van Der Wildt G, Bouman M, Van De Kraats J. The effect of anticipation on the transfer function of the human lens system. Opt Acta (Lond). 1974;21(11):843–60.
  • Phillips S, Shirachi D, Stark L. Analysis of accommodative response times using histogram information. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1972;49(5):389–401.
  • Otero C, Aldaba M, Vera-Diaz F, Pujol J. Effect of experimental conditions in the accommodation response in myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2017. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001140.
  • Aldaba M, Otero C, Pujol J, Atchison D. Does the Badal optometer stimulate accommodation accurately? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(1):88–95.
  • Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes: A summary and update. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(6):613–21.
  • Shibata T, Kim J, Hoffman DM, Banks MS. Visual discomfort with stereo displays: Effects of viewing distance and direction of vergence-accommodation conflict. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011;7863:78630P-1-78630P-9.
  • Lambooij M, Ijsselsteijn W, Fortuin M, Heynderickx I. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: A review. J Imaging Sci Technol. 2009;53(3):30201–30201–14.
  • Schaeffel F, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: Relation to age and refractive errors. J Physiol. 1993;32:301–20.
  • Aldaba M, Gómez-López S, Vilaseca M, Pujol J, Arjona M. Comparing autorefractors for measurement of accommodation. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(10):1003–11.
  • Otero C, Aldaba M, Martínez-Navarro B, Pujol J. Effect of apparent depth cues on accommodation in a Badal optometer. Clin Exp Optom. 2017. doi:10.1111/cxo.12534.
  • Charman WN, Tucker J. Dependence of the accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object. Vision Res. 1977;17(1):129–39.
  • Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res. 2006;46(8–9):1507–19.
  • Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vision Res. 2005;45(1):17–28.
  • Bernal-Molina P, Marín-Franch I, Del Aguila-Carrasco AJ, Esteve-Taboada JJ, López-Gil N, Kruger PB, Montés-Micó, R. Human eyes do not need monochromatic aberrations for dynamic accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(5):602–609.
  • Momeni-Moghaddam H, Kundart J, Askarizadeh F. Comparing measurement techniques of accommodative amplitudes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:683–87.
  • Kasthurirangan S, Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res. 2003;43(27):2945–56.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.
  • McKenzie K, Kerr S, Rouse M, DeLand P. Study of accommodative facility testing reliability. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(3):186–94.
  • Ciuffreda K, Wang B. Vision training and sports. In: Hung G, Pallis J, editors. Biomedical engineering principles in sports. 1st ed. Boston, MA: Springer; 2004.
  • Mordi JA, Ciuffreda KJ. Dynamic aspects of accommodation: Age and presbyopia. Vision Res. 2004;44(6):591–601.
  • Stark L, Atchison D. Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(2):528–37.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.