Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK

References

• Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3118–21. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1572–75. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.075580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purslow PP, Karwatowski WS. Ocular elasticity. Is engineering stiffness a more useful characterization parameter than ocular rigidity? Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1686–92. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30446-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YM. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure. J Biomech. 2008;41:1707–13. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146–55. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih CY, Graff Zivin JS, Trokel SL, Tsai JC. Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1270–75. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.9.1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Pye D. Goldmann tonometry correction factors based on numerical analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2009;131:111013. doi:10.1115/1.4000112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:471–76. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.4.471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunvant P, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, Joseph IS, Watkins RJ, Nallapothula M, Broadway DC, O’Leary DJ. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:518–22. doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.019331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:767–72. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71125-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:969–73. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96021-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Gunvant P, Garway-Heath D. Multiparameter correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:E102–12. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fc3453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34–43. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol. 1999;61:551–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3790–94. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:344–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1287–93. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.9.1287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ito K, Tawara A, Kubota T, Harada Y. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:35–40. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820275b4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz-Frances F, Garcia-Catalan R, Jerez-Fidalgo M, Fernandez-Vidal A, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Mendez-Hernandez C, Santos-Bueso E, Reche-Frutos J, Garcia-Sanchez J, Garcia-Feijoo J. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry measurements: effects of corneal morphometry. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011;86:287–91. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2011.04.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156–62. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Geraghty B, Rama P, Campanelli M, Meek KM. Characterization of age-related variation in corneal biomechanical properties. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7:1475–85. doi:10.1098/rsif.2010.0108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Ambrosio R Jr., Kang DS, Lopes BT, Morenghi E, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:550–61. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160524-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joda AA, Shervin MM, Kook D, Elsheikh A. Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016;19:943–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman’s keratomileusis? J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S90–6. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080101-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Francis M, Shroff R, Pahuja N, Khamar P, Girrish M, Nuijts R, Sinha Roy A. Corneal biomechanical changes and tissue remodeling after SMILE and LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5703–12. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-22864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuura M, Hirasawa K, Murata H, Yanagisawa M, Nakao Y, Nakakura S, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R. The relationship between Corvis ST tonometry and ocular response analyzer measurements in eyes with glaucoma. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Yu Z, Jiang C, Zhou X, Liu Z, Sun X, Xu J. Corvis ST tonometer for measuring postoperative IOP in LASIK patients. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:589–95. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong JX, Xu JJ, Wei AJ, Deng SX, Cui XH, Yu XB, Sun XH. A new tonometer-the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Invest Ophth Vis Sci. 2013;54:659–65. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao F, Huang Z, Huang J, Wang J, Deng M, Li L, Yu A, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. Clinical evaluation of methods to correct intraocular pressure measurements by the Goldmann Applanation tonometer, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST tonometer for the effects of corneal stiffness parameters. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:510–19. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P. Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e66–73. doi:10.1111/aos.12209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou CY, Jordan CA, Mcghee CNJ, Patel DV. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:412–18. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theelen T, Meulendijks CF, Geurts DE, van Leeuwen A, Voet NB, Deutman AF. Impact factors on intraocular pressure measurements in healthy subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1510–11. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.049924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Cayer MM, Descovich D, Kamdeu-Fansi A, Harasymowycz PJ, Li G, Lesk MR. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:482–87. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efbe8f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Hammond CJ. Comparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness. Eye (Lond). 2010;24:1165–70. doi:10.1038/eye.2010.11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen LH, Chan WK, Koh J, Mehta JS, Tan DT. A 10-year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 37,932 eyes at a single institution in Asia. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1236–44 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Danasoury MA, El Maghraby A, Coorpender SJ. Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam AK, Wu R, Wang Z, Woo V, Chan E, Tam K, Chau R, Wong KK. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:631–36. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadok D, Tran DB, Twa M, Carpenter M, Schanzlin DJ. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1344–48. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00202-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:746–51. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang DH, Stulting RD. Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1009–16. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan F, Li C, Li Y, Duan X, Pan D. Intraocular pressure instrument reading comparisons after LASIK. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:850–54. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821909df.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Boehm AG, Pollack K. A correction formula for the real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:263–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm AG, Weber A, Pillunat LE, Koch R, Spoerl E. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2472–77. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Foudoulakis NC, Kozobolis VP. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:767–73. doi:10.1007/s00417-010-1431-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han KE, Kim H, Kim NR, Jun I, Kim EK, Kim TI. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:888–97. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales-Sanz M, Arranz-Marquez E, Pinero DP, Arruabarrena C, Mikropoulos DG, Teus MA. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on Schiotz, Goldmann, and dynamic contour tonometric measurements. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:e419–23. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Levine J, Schwiegerling J, Enikov ET. Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:215. doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0608-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Wang Y, Dou R, Wei P, Zhang J, Zhao W, Li L. Intraocular pressure changes and relationship with corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:4180–86. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin J, Kim TW, Park SJ, Yoon M, Lee JW. Changes in Biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:195–201. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829da1ec.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shousha SM, Abo Steit MA, Hosny MH, Ewais WA, Shalaby AM. Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:71–79. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S37978.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen KJ, Joda A, Vinciguerra R, Eliasy A, Mir Mohi Sefat S, Kook D, Geraghty B, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:581–88. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrosio R Jr., Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS. Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:1495–503. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar