Good Visual Performance Despite Reduced Optical Quality during the First Month of Orthokeratology Lens Wear

References

• Pan CW, Dirani M, Cheng CY, Wong TY, Saw SM. The age-specific prevalence of myopia in asia: A meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(3):258–66. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charm J, Cho P. High myopia-partial reduction ortho-k: A 2-year randomized study. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(6):530–39. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318293657d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology (romio) study: A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7077–85. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Du Y, Liu Q, Ren C, Liu J, Wang Q, Li L, Yu J. Effects of orthokeratology on the progression of low to moderate myopia in chinese children. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:126. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0302-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng D, Woo GC, Drobe B, Schmid KL. Effect of bifocal and prismatic bifocal spectacles on myopia progression in children: three-year results of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(3):258–64. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H, Nonaka T, Nakatsuka C, Miyata M, Hamasaki I, Kimura S. Effect of progressive addition lenses on myopia progression in japanese children: A prospective, randomized, double-masked, crossover trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7):2781–89. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua WH, Balakrishnan V, Chan YH, Tong L, Ling Y, Quah BL, Tan D. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(12):2285–91. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia A, Chua WH, Cheung YB, Wong WL, Lingham A, Fong A, Tan D. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (atropine for the treatment of myopia 2). Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):347–54. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni PS, Nguyen TT, Bonanno JA. Overnight orthokeratology: visual and corneal changes. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(3):137–45. doi:10.1097/01.ICL.0000072831.13880.A0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheung SW, Cho P. Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology–a cross-sectional study. Curr Eye Res. 2004;28(2):121–27. doi:10.1076/ceyr.28.2.121.26236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maseedupally V, Gifford P, Lum E, Swarbrick H. Central and paracentral corneal curvature changes during orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(11):1249–58. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong Y, Chen Z, Xue F, Miao H, Zhou X. Central and peripheral corneal power change in myopic orthokeratology and its relationship with 2-year axial length change. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(8):4514–19. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-13935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, Kakita T, Oshika T. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order aberrations following overnight orthokeratology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(2):550–56. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, Takahira T, Kakita T, Oshika T. Mesopic contrast sensitivity and ocular higher-order aberrations after overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(4):645–55. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.11.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Oshika T. Influence of ocular wavefront aberrations on axial length elongation in myopic children treated with overnight orthokeratology. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):93–100. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santolaria-Sanz E, Cervino A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Corneal aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and light distortion in orthokeratology patients: 1-year results. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:8453462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft daily wear: A visual quality of life study (interim results). Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:214–217; discussion 218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santolaria E, Cervino A, Queiros A, Brautaset R, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Subjective satisfaction in long-term orthokeratology patients. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(6):388–93. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182a27777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santolaria Sanz E, Cervino A, Queiros A, Villa-Collar C, Lopes-Ferreira D, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Short-term changes in light distortion in orthokeratology subjects. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:278425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (loric) in hong kong: A pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Curr Eye Res. 2005;30(1):71–80. doi:10.1080/02713680590907256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarbrick HA, Alharbi A, Watt K, Lum E, Kang P. Myopia control during orthokeratology lens wear in children using a novel study design. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(3):620–30. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habtegiorgis SW, Rifai K, Lappe M, Wahl S. Experience-dependent long-term facilitation of skew adaptation. J Vis. 2018;18(9):7. doi:10.1167/18.9.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leube A, Ohlendorf A, Wahl S. Global shape integration optotypes for the clinical assessment of visual acuity and subjective refraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(9):1085. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson F, Wilson HR, Habak C. Detection and recognition of radial frequency patterns. Vision Res. 1998;38(22):3555–68. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00039-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen KT, Beaudot WH. Comparison of color and luminance vision on a global shape discrimination task. Vision Res. 2002;42(5):565–75. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00305-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov IV, Mullen KT. The role of local features in shape discrimination of contour- and surface-defined radial frequency patterns at low contrast. Vision Res. 2012;52(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YZ, Morale SE, Cousins R, Birch EE. Course of development of global hyperacuity over lifespan. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(6):695–700. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a7b0ff.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakel F, Wichmann FA. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naive observers. J Vis. 2006;6(11):1307–22. doi:10.1167/6.11.13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjortdal JO, Erdmann L, Bek T. Fourier analysis of video-keratographic data. A tool for separation of spherical, regular astigmatic and irregular astigmatic corneal power components. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:171–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshika T, Tomidokoro A, Maruo K, Tokunaga T, Miyata N. Quantitative evaluation of irregular astigmatism by fourier series harmonic analysis of videokeratography data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:705–09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yang D, Bi H, Du B, Lin W, Gu T, Zhang B, Wei R. A new method to analyze the relative corneal refractive power and its association to myopic progression control with orthokeratology. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018;7(6):17. doi:10.1167/tvst.7.4.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guirao A, Artal P. Corneal wave aberration from videokeratography: accuracy and limitations of the procedure. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2000;17(6):955–65. doi:10.1364/josaa.17.000955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwiegerling J, Greivenkamp JE. Using corneal height maps and polynomial decomposition to determine corneal aberrations. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(11):906–16. doi:10.1097/00006324-199711000-00024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su B, Zhang B, Huang J, Xie W, Wu Z, Lin M, Chen Z, Wu H, Jiang J, Lu F. The effect of transient glare on shape discrimination threshold in myopic adults. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(2):220–24. doi:10.1111/cxo.12616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli DG. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997;10:437–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brainard DH. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997;10:433–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nancy C, Daniel K. Clinical procedures for ocular examination. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Education. doi:10.1036/9780071849197.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RC. Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, 2015. R Package Version. 2016;3:103.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeev N, Tan E, Liyana R, Metha A. Shape discrimination thresholds among subjects with emmetropia and corrected myopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98(4):353–58. doi:10.1111/cxo.12249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford CW, Webster MA, Stanley GB, Stocker AA, Kohn A, Sharpee TO, Schwartz O. Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vision Res. 2007;47(25):3125–31. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch RB Perceptual modification: adapting to altered sensory environments. In: Welch RB, editor. Perceptual modification: adapting to altered sensory environments. Perceptual modification; 1978/01/01/: Academic Press; 1978. p. 346.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson H, Zaidi Q. Colour constancy in context: roles for local adaptation and levels of reference. J Vis. 2004;4(9):693–710. doi:10.1167/4.9.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster MA. Adaptation and visual coding. J Vis. 2011;11:5. doi:10.1167/11.5.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmore SC, Shevell SK. Very-long-term chromatic adaptation: test of gain theory and a new method. Vis Neurosci. 2008;25(3):411–14. doi:10.1017/S0952523808080450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmore SC, Shevell SK. Very-long-term and short-term chromatic adaptation: are their influences cumulative? Vision Res. 2011;51(3):362–66. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delahunt PB, Webster MA, Ma L, Werner JS. Long-term renormalization of chromatic mechanisms following cataract surgery. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21:301–07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner A, Enoch JM. Some effects of 1 week’s monocular exposure to long-wavelength stimuli. Percept Psychophys. 1982;31(2):169–74. doi:10.3758/bf03206217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neitz J, Carroll J, Yamauchi Y, Neitz M, Williams DR. Color perception is mediated by a plastic neural mechanism that is adjustable in adults. Neuron. 2002;35(4):783–92. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00818-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao M, Engel SA. Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(15):5898–903. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113503109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao M, Fast E, Mesik J, Engel S. Distinct mechanisms control contrast adaptation over different timescales. J Vis. 2013;13(10). doi:10.1167/13.10.14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Legge GE, Fang F, Cheong AM, He S. Adaptive changes in visual cortex following prolonged contrast reduction. J Vis. 2009;9(2):20.21–16. doi:10.1167/9.2.20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams WJ, Banks MS, van Ee R. Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4(11):1063–64. doi:10.1038/nn729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habtegiorgis SW, Rifai K, Lappe M, Wahl S. Adaptation to skew distortions of natural scenes and retinal specificity of its aftereffects. Front Psychol. 2017;8(1158). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yehezkel O, Sagi D, Sterkin A, Belkin M, Polat U. Learning to adapt: dynamics of readaptation to geometrical distortions. Vision Res. 2010;50(16):1550–58. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister DJ, Fisher SW. Progress in the spectacle correction of presbyopia. Part 1: design and development of progressive lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91(3):240–50. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00245.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy J, Andre B. Prescribing multifocal lenses. In: Tasman W, E. J, editors. Duane’s clinical ophthalmology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 2005. p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas EA, Artal P. Spatially resolved wavefront aberrations of ophthalmic progressive-power lenses in normal viewing conditions. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(2):106–14. doi:10.1097/00006324-200302000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmela VR, Henriksson L, Vanni S. Radial frequency analysis of contour shapes in the visual cortex. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(2):e1004719. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidtmann G, Kingdom FAA. Nothing more than a pair of curvatures: A common mechanism for the detection of both radial and non-radial frequency patterns. Vision Res. 2017;134(18–25). doi:10.1016/j.visres.2017.03.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn OJ, Jeffrey BG. Scotopic contour and shape discrimination using radial frequency patterns. J Vis. 2019;19(2):7. doi:10.1167/19.2.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slugocki M, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ. Phase-selective masking with radial frequency contours. Vision Res. 2019;154(1–13). doi:10.1016/j.visres.2018.10.013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeffrey BG, Wang YZ, Birch EE. Circular contour frequency in shape discrimination. Vision Res. 2002;42(25):2773–79. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00332-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakic P. Prenatal genesis of connections subserving ocular dominance in the rhesus monkey. Nature. 1976;261(5560):467–71. doi:10.1038/261467a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batardiere A, Barone P, Knoblauch K, Giroud P, Berland M, Dumas AM, Kennedy H. Early specification of the hierarchical organization of visual cortical areas in the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12(5):453–65. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.5.453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Zheng J, Watanabe I, Maruko I, Bi H, Smith EL, 3rd, Chino Y. Delayed maturation of receptive field center/surround mechanisms in v2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(16):5862–67. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501815102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YZ. Effects of aging on shape discrimination. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78(6):447–54. doi:10.1097/00006324-200106000-00019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artal P, Chen L, Fernandez EJ, Singer B, Manzanera S, Williams DR. Neural compensation for the eye’s optical aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4(4):281–87. doi:10.1167/4.4.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Artal P, Gutierrez D, Williams DR. Neural compensation for the best aberration correction. J Vis. 2007;7(10):9.1–9. doi:10.1167/7.10.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villegas EA, Alcon E, Artal P. Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(10):4688–96. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorente-Velazquez A, Nieto-Bona A, Collar CV, Mesa AG. Straylight and contrast sensitivity after corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(10):1245–51. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182271449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorente-Velazquez A, Gonzalez Mesa A, Gutierrez JR, Villa-Collar C, Nieto-Bona A. Long-term changes in straylight induced by corneal refractive therapy: A pilot study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(3):144–48. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian M, Ma P, Mu G. Prospective cohort comparison of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity between femto laser in situ keratomileusis and orthokeratology for low-to-moderate myopia. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 1):S194–s198. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen T, Su B, Chen Z, Tong J, Bedell H, Song Z, Zhang B. The associations among metamorphopsia, orientation discrimination threshold, and retinal layer thickness in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(9):1151–59. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1481515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He JC, Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Wave-front aberrations in the anterior corneal surface and the whole eye. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003;20(7):1155–63. doi:10.1364/josaa.20.001155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobbe M, Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ. Lasik-induced aberrations: comparing corneal and whole-eye measurements. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(4):447–55. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford P, Li M, Lu H, Miu J, Panjaya M, Swarbrick HA. Corneal versus ocular aberrations after overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(5):439–47. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828ec594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlinden C, Lipson M. Orthokeratology and contact lens quality of life questionnaire (ocl-qol). Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(5):279–85. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Wang YZ, Dakin SC. Are judgements of circularity local or global? Vision Res. 1999;39(26):4354–60. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00153-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar