Changing Trends in Penetrating Keratoplasty Indications between 2011 and 2018 – Histopathology of 2123 Corneal Buttons in a Single Center in Germany

References

• Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, Thuret G. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:167–73. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirm EK. Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik (A successful total keratoplasty). 1906. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989;5:258–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melles GR, Remeijer L, Geerards AJ, Beekhuis WH. The future of lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10:253–59. doi:10.1097/00055735-199908000-00006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2368–73. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogutlu Sari E, Kubaloglu A, Unal M, Pinero D, Bulut N, Erol MK, Ozerturk Y. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for macular corneal dystrophy: a randomized trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:267–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flockerzi E, Maier P, Bohringer D, Reinshagen H, Kruse F, Cursiefen C, Reinhard T, Geerling G, Torun N, Seitz B, et al. Trends in corneal transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: a report of the DOG-section cornea and its keratoplasty registry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;188:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthaei M, Sandhaeger H, Hermel M, Adler W, Jun AS, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM. Changing indications in penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review of 34 Years of global reporting. Transplantation. 2017;101:1387–99. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Hasenfus A, Schirra F, Bohle RM, Seitz B, Szentmary N. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Homburg/Saar from 2001 to 2010–histopathology of 1,200 corneal buttons. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:797–802. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2117-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart RM, Jones MN, Batterbury M, Tole D, Larkin DF, Kaye SB, Group NOTA, Contributing O. Effect of glaucoma on corneal graft survival according to indication for penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:257–262 e251. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szentmáry N, Bausz M, Tóth J, Süveges I. Eleven years of corneal transplantation (1992–2003) at the Semmelweis University 1st Department of Ophthalmology. Szemészet. 2004;141:387–91.
   Google Scholar
• Brady SE, Rapuano CJ, Arentsen JJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Clinical indications for and procedures associated with penetrating keratoplasty, 1983-1988. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:118–22. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(89)90003-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu E, Slomovic AR. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Canada, 1986–1995. Cornea. 1997;16:414–19. doi:10.1097/00003226-199707000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins KR, Price FW Jr., Whitson WE. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea. 2000;19:813–16. doi:10.1097/00003226-200011000-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon CA, McCarthy JM, White VA. Correlation of clinical and pathologic diagnoses of corneal disease in penetrating keratoplasties in Vancouver: a 10-year review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2012;47:5–10. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, Vajpayee RB. Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India. Cornea. 2005;24:989–91. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000157406.34662.0f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, Qi F, Gao H, Wang T, Shi W, Zhao J. Major shifts in corneal transplantation procedures in north China: 5316 eyes over 12 years. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1291–95. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.148981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cursiefen C, Kuchle M, Naumann GO. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1,250 corneal buttons. Cornea. 1998;17:468–70. doi:10.1097/00003226-199809000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang GK, Wilk CM, Naumann GO. Changes in the indications status for keratoplasty (Erlangen, 1964–1986)]. Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1988;85:255–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eye Bank Association of America. 2016 eye banking statistical report; 2017 [accessed 2019 Jun 7]. http://restoresight.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2016_Statistical_Report-Final-040717.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ting DS, Sau CY, Srinivasan S, Ramaesh K, Mantry S, Roberts F. Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:405–08. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasolo A, Frigo AC, Bohm E, Genisi C, Rama P, Spadea L, Mastropirro B, Fornea M, Ponzin D, Grigoletto F. The CORTES study: corneal transplant indications and graft survival in an Italian cohort of patients. Cornea. 2006;25:507–15. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000214211.60317.1f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigo AC, Fasolo A, Capuzzo C, Fornea M, Bellucci R, Busin M, Marchini G, Pedrotti E, Ponzin D. Corneal transplantation activity over 7 years: changing trends for indications, patient demographics and surgical techniques from the Corneal Transplant Epidemiological Study (CORTES). Transplant Proc. 2015;47:528–35. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.10.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siganos CS, Tsiklis NS, Miltsakakis DG, Georgiadis NS, Georgiadou IN, Kymionis GD, Pallikaris IG. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Greece, 1982–2006: a multicenter study. Cornea. 2010;29:372–74. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181bd44a1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Módis Jr L Jr., Szalai E, Facsko A, Fodor M, Komar T, Berta A. Corneal transplantation in Hungary (1946–2009). Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39:520–25. doi:10.1111/ceo.2011.39.issue-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, Kus MM, Kuchle M, Naumann GO. Results of the first 1,000 consecutive elective nonmechanical keratoplasties using the excimer laser. A prospective study over more than 12 years. Ophthalmologe. 2004;101:478–88. doi:10.1007/s00347-003-0900-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graupner M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Martus P, Bluthner K, Nguyen NX, Wenkel H, Kuchle M. Interim results from the prospective “Erlanger non-high-risk penetrating keratoplasty study” in 207 patients. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2000;217:163–70. doi:10.1055/s-2000-10340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Rank RM, Budde WM. Visual outcome after allogenic penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:302–07. doi:10.1007/s00417-002-0440-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohringer D, Schindler A, Reinhard T. Satisfaction with penetrating keratoplasty. Results of a questionnaire census. Ophthalmologe. 2006;103:677–81. doi:10.1007/s00347-006-1373-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang SJ, Bischoff M, Bohringer D, Seitz B, Reinhard T. Analysis of the changes in keratoplasty indications and preferred techniques. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112696. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, Song Z, Zhao J, Shi W, Wang F. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in north China. Cornea. 2007;26:1070–73. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318093de07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Xu J. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in East China, 1994-2003. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:1005–09. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-1167-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JY, Xie LX, Song XS, Zhao J. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Shandong, 2005–2010. Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4:492–97. doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.05.07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasar L, Pujar C, Gill KS, Patil M, Salagar M. Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in southern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2505–07. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/7030.3591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Kuchle M, Naumann GO. Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1156–64. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90265-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Prakash G, Titiyal JS, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. Pediatric keratoplasty in India: indications and outcomes. Cornea. 2007;26:810–13. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318074ce2e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Q, Li X, Gu Y. Indications and outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary hospital in the developing world. Clin Ex Ophthalmol. 2012;40:232–38. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02598.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong PN, Han TN, Aldave AJ, Chau HT. Indications for and techniques of keratoplasty at Vietnam National Institute of Ophthalmology. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:379–83. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.03.09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson RJ. Cataract surgery from 1918 to the present and future-just imagine! Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;185:10–13. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Lander F, Beekhuis WH, Remeijer L, Binder PS. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty for a case of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:340–41. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00324-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1818–30. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WL, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Taiwan from 1987 to 1999. Cornea. 2001;20:141–44. doi:10.1097/00003226-200103000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar