References
- Garcia A, Cacho P, Lara F, Megias R. The relation between accommodative facility and general binocular dysfunction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20(2):98–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2000.00478.x.
- Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocular vision: heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders. 5th Scheiman M, Wick B editors. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. p. 760.
- Kiely PM, Crewther SG, Crewther DP. Is there an association between functional vision and learning to read? Clin Exp Optom. 2001;84(6):346–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2001.tb06606.x.
- Allen PM, O´Leary DJ. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error. Vision Res. 2006;46(4):491–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.007.
- Benzoni JA, Collier JD, McHugh K, Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Does the dynamic cross cylinder test measure the accommodative response accurately? Optometry [Internet]. 2009;80(11):630–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optm.2009.07.012.
- Adler P, Scally AJ, Barrett BT. Test-retest reproducibility of accommodative facility measures in primary school children. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(6):764–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12691.
- Win-hall DM, La O, Kasthurirangan S. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci [Internet]. 2007 [accessed 2021 Feb];84(9):879–87.
- Rosenfield M, Cohen AS. Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16(3):247–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.1996.95000933.x.
- Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(10):1878–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00667-9.
- Group C of MET. 2 SG for the PEDI. Accommodative Lag by Autorefraction and Two Dynamic Retinoscopy Methods. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86(3):233–43.
- Anderson HA, Stuebing KK. Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(11):1290–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000402.
- Zellers J, Alpert T, Rouse M. A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Am Optom Assoc. 1984;55:31–37.
- McLin LN, Schor CM, Kruger PB. Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence. Vision Res. 1988;28(8):883–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(88)90098-3.
- Hunt OA, Wolffsohn JS, García-Resúa C. Ocular motor triad with single vision contact lenses compared to spectacle lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(5):239–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2006.08.004.
- Otero C, Aldaba M, López S, Díaz-Doutón F, Vera-Díaz FA, Pujol J Random changes of accommodation stimuli: an automated extension of the flippers accommodative facility test. Curr Eye Res [Internet]. 2018 [accessed 2021 Feb];43(6):788–95.
- Radhakrishnan H, Allen PM, Charman WN. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(9):4375–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0269.
- Allen PM, Charman WN, Radhakrishnan H Changes in dynamics of accommodation after accommodative facility training in myopes and emmetropes. Vision Res [Internet]. 2010 [accessed 2021 Feb];50(10):947–55.
- Vera J, Redondo B, Molina R, Koulieris GA, Jiménez R Validation of an objective method for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of binocular accommodative facility. Curr Eye Res [Internet]. 2020 [accessed 2021 Feb];45(5):636–44.
- Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Heal Pharm. 2008;65(23):2276–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364.
- Jiménez R, Martínez-Almeida L, Salas C, Ortíz C. Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function? Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(6):925–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1570-z.
- Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocular vision: heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
- Kundart J, Hayes JR, Gietzen J, Sheedy J Real-time objective measurement of accommodation while reading. J Behav Optom [Internet]. 2011 [accessed 2021 Feb];22(5):130–34. Available from: http://www.oepf.org/sites/default/files/22-5-KUNDART_0.pdf
- Elliot D. Clinical procedures in primary eye care. 3rd ed. UK: Butterworth Heinemann; 2007. p. 336.
- Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH, Chase C Accommodation response and visual discomfort. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt [Internet]. 2009 Nov [cited 2014 Jul 2];29( 6):625–33. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19821926
- Vera J, Diaz-Piedra C, Jiménez R, Morales JM, Catena A, Cardenas D, Di Stasi LL. Driving time modulates accommodative response and intraocular pressure. Physiol Behav [Internet]. 2016 [accessed 2021 Feb];164:47–53.
- Vera J, Jiménez R, Garcia-Ramos A, Cárdenas D. Muscular strength is associated with higher intraocular pressure in physically active males. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(2):143–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001169.
- Hopkins W. Spreadsheets for analysis of validity and reliability. Sportscience. 2017;21:36–44.
- Scheiman M, Herzberg H, Frantz KMM. Normative study of accommodative facility in elementary schoolchidren. J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65(2):127–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198802000-00009.
- Yothers T, Wick B, Morse S. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part II. Development of an Amplitude-scaled Test. Optometry 2002;73:91–102.
- Roberts TL, Manny RE, Benoit JS, Anderson HA. Impact of cognitive demand during sustained near tasks in children and adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(3):223–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001186.
- Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(2):153–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01031.x.
- Leary DJ, Allen PM. Facility of accommodation in myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21(5):352–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00597.x.