Clinical Ocular Biomechanics: Where Are We after 20 Years of Progress?

References

• Metzler KM, Mahmoud AM, Liu J, Roberts CJ. Deformation response of paired donor corneas to an air puff: Intact whole globe versus mounted corneoscleral rim. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(6):888–896. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.02.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BA, Reilly MA, Roberts CJ. Biomechanical contribution of the sclera to dynamic corneal response in air-puff induced deformation in human donor eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2020;191:107904. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2019.107904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BA, Roberts CJ, Reilly MA. Biomechanical impact of the sclera on corneal deformation response to an air-puff: a finite-element study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling S, Marcos S. Contributing factors to corneal deformation in air puff measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(7):5078–5085. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(6):862–869. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taroni L, Bernabei F, Pellegrini M, Roda M, Toschi PG, Mahmoud AM, Schiavi C, Giannaccare G, Roberts CJ. Corneal biomechanical response alteration after scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;217:49–54. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Corneal hysteresis and beyond: does it involve the sclera? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(4):427–429. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R, Ramos I, Luz A, Faria FC, Steinmueller A, Krug M, Belin MW, Roberts CJ. Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties. Rev Brasoftalmol. 2013;72(2):99–102. doi:10.1590/S0034-72802013000200005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon Y, Lam AK. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(1):e1-8–e8. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318279eb87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bak-Nielsen S, Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Repeatability, reproducibility, and age dependency of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device. Cornea. 2015;34(1):71–77. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Bons JP, Hossain A, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Ambrosio R. Jr. Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff-induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(4):266–273. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20161221-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynska A, Moehler K, Spoerl E, Ramm L, Herber R, Pillunat LE, Terai N. Measurement of orbital biomechanical properties in patients with thyroid orbitopathy using the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST). Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(3):289–292. doi:10.1080/02713683.2017.1405044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Ambrosio R, Jr., Kang DS, Lopes BT, Morenghi E, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(8):550–561. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160524-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, Lopes BT, Abass A, Vinciguerra P, Ambrosio R, Jr., Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using Corvis ST tonometry: stress-strain index. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen TT, Simonsen AH, Oxlund H. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res. 1980;31(4):435–441. doi:10.1016/s0014-4835(80)80027-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarcelli G, Besner S, Pineda R, Yun SH. Biomechanical characterization of keratoconus corneas ex vivo with brillouin microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(7):4490–4495. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarcelli G, Besner S, Pineda R, Kalout P, Yun SH. In vivo biomechanical mapping of normal and keratoconus corneas. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(4):480–482. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ. Jr. Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(6):991–998. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labiris G, Gatzioufas Z, Sideroudi H, Giarmoukakis A, Kozobolis V, Seitz B. Biomechanical diagnosis of keratoconus: Evaluation of the keratoconus match index and the keratoconus match probability. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(4):e258-262–e262. doi:10.1111/aos.12056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek KM, Tuft SJ, Huang Y, Gill PS, Hayes S, Newton RH, Bron AJ. Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(6):1948–1956. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R, Jr., Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Morenghi E, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):803–810. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R, Jr., Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomao MQ, Buhren J, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434–443. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R, Jr., Roberts CJ, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Biomechanical characterization of subclinical keratoconus without topographic or tomographic abnormalities. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(6):399–407. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170213-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauwe C, Touboul D, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Kerautret J, Fournier P, Malecaze F, Colin J. Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(10):1761–1767. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Fernandez-Vega-Cueto L, Poo-Lopez A, Eliasy A, Merayo-Lloves J, Elsheikh A, Madrid-Costa D, Lisa C, Alfonso JF. The effect of intracorneal ring segments implantation for keratoconus on in vivo corneal biomechanics assessed with the Corvis ST. J Refract Surg. 2022;38(4):264–269. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20220202-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620–627. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Ji P, Lin X. Efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127079. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Albe E, Mahmoud AM, Trazza S, Hafezi F, Roberts CJ. Intra- and postoperative variation in ocular response analyzer parameters in keratoconic eyes after corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(9):669–676. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100331-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass DH, Roberts CJ, Litsky AS, Weber PA. A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(9):3919–3926. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Romano V, Arbabi EM, Brunner M, Willoughby CE, Batterbury M, Kaye SB. In vivo early corneal biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking in patients with progressive keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(12):840–846. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170922-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Ambrosio R, Jr., Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Roberts CJ, Ghaffari R, Asgari S. Two-year changes in corneal stiffness parameters after accelerated corneal cross-linking. J Biomech. 2019;93:209–212. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Ambrosio R, Jr., Roberts CJ, Yekta AA, Danesh Z, Reisdorf S, Khabazkhoob M, Heidari HR, Sadeghi J. Long-term evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus: a 4-year longitudinal study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(12):849–856. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20181012-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ, Jr., Roberts C. Effect of acute biomechanical changes on corneal curvature after photokeratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2001;17(6):658–669. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20011101-05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(4):407–413. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20000701-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14(1):46–52. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(88)80063-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SM, Kang MT, Wang NL, Abariga SA. Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12:CD012687. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012687.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruberti JW, Sinha Roy A, Roberts CJ. Corneal biomechanics and biomaterials. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011; 13:269– 295. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ, Jr., Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83(4):709–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Raevsky T, Simoni GJ, Lloyd HO, Najafi DJ, Rondeau MJ, Coleman DJ. Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3d pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(4):414–430. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20000701-04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox Cartwright NE, Tyrer JR, Jaycock PD, Marshall J. Effects of variation in depth and side cut angulations in LASIK and thin-flap LASIK using a femtosecond laser: a biomechanical study. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(6):419–425. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20120518-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang ES, Schallhorn JM, Randleman JB. Utility of regional epithelial thickness measurements in corneal evaluations. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020;65(2):187–204. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-bowman’s keratomileusis? J Refract Surg. 2008;24(1):S90–S96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after smile versus FLEx, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):167. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrosio R, Jr., Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS. Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(12):1495–1503. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seven I, Vahdati A, Pedersen IB, Vestergaard A, Hjortdal J, Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ. Jr. Contralateral eye comparison of smile and flap-based corneal refractive surgery: computational analysis of biomechanical impact. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):444–453. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170504-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Roberts CJ, Ambrosio R, Jr., Elsheikh A, Kang DSY, Kim TI. Effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking combined with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy on dynamic corneal response parameters and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure measured with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy myopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):937–945. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemesure B, Honkanen R, Hennis A, Wu SY, Leske MC. Incident open-angle glaucoma and intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(10):1810–1815. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Bello C, Chauhan BC, Nicolela MT, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP. Intraocular pressure and progression of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129(3):302–308. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00387-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(1):48–56. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.1.48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, Milton RC, Kini MM, Kahn HA, Nickerson RJ, Pool J, Colton TL, Ganley JP, et al. The Framingham eye study monograph: an ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24(Suppl):335–610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bengtsson B. The prevalence of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981;65(1):46–49. doi:10.1136/bjo.65.1.46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins ES. The Bedford Glaucoma Survey. I. Long-term follow-up of borderline cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1973;57(3):179–185. doi:10.1136/bjo.57.3.179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitazawa Y, Horie T, Aoki S, Suzuki M, Nishioka K. Untreated ocular hypertension. A long-term prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(7):1180–1184. doi:10.1001/archopht.1977.04450070078004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almasieh M, Wilson AM, Morquette B, Cueva Vargas JL, Di Polo A. The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31(2):152–181. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs JC, Girkin CA. Lamina cribrosa in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28(2):113–119. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR. Finite element modeling of optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(12):4378–4387. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe RY, Gracitelli CP, Diniz-Filho A, Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA. Lamina cribrosa in glaucoma: diagnosis and monitoring. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2015;3(2):74–84. doi:10.1007/s40135-015-0067-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK, 2nd, Wilson MR, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714. 714-720; discussion 829-730. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon MO, Torri V, Miglior S, Beiser JA, Floriani I, Miller JP, Gao F, Adamsons I, Poli D, D'Agostino RB, et al. Validated prediction model for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):10–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis BA, Varma R, Chopra V, Lai MY, Shtir C, Azen SP. Intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, and prevalence of open-angle glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(5):741–746. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Nee M, Bostrom A, St??Rmer J??r, Stamper RL. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(2):91–97. doi:10.1097/00061198-200604000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z, Group E. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1965–1972. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sng C, Barton K, Kim H, Yuan S, Budenz DL. Central corneal thickness and its associations with ocular and systemic factors in an urban west African population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:268–275. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day AC, Machin D, Aung T, Gazzard G, Husain R, Chew PT, Khaw PT, Seah SK, Foster PJ. Central corneal thickness and glaucoma in east Asian people. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(11):8407–8412. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belovay GW, Goldberg I. The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma. Eye. 2018;32(5):915–923. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0033-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JH, Zhang X, Kripke DF, Weinreb RN. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(4):1586–1590. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YR, Kook MS, Joe SG, Na JH, Han S, Kim S, Shin CJ. Circadian (24-hour) pattern of intraocular pressure and visual field damage in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(2):881–887. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(1):1–30. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(93)90053-a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, Thiel MA. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(8):1104–1108. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.8.1104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, Liu G, Li G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1627–1635. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, Lichter PR, Varma R, Group CS. Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(9):1766–1773. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal IA, Yang H, Roberts MD, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC. IOP-induced lamina cribrosa displacement and scleral canal expansion: an analysis of factor interactions using parameterized eye-specific models. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1896–1907. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand A, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Corneal hysteresis and visual field asymmetry in open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(12):6514–6518. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmy H, Leila M, Zaki AA. Corneal biomechanics in asymmetrical normal-tension glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:503–510. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S93725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Susanna CN, Diniz-Filho A, Daga FB, Susanna BN, Zhu F, Ogata NG, Medeiros FA. A prospective longitudinal study to investigate corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for predicting development of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;187:148–152. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.12.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Tatham AJ, Abe RY, Diniz-Filho A, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA. Corneal hysteresis and progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;166:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moraes CV, Hill V, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Lower corneal hysteresis is associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(4):209–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki S, Miki A, Omoto T, Fujino Y, Matsuura M, Murata H, Asaoka R. Biomechanical glaucoma factor and corneal hysteresis in treated primary open-angle glaucoma and their associations with visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(7):4. doi:10.1167/iovs.62.7.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Meira-Freitas D, Lisboa R, Kuang TM, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression: a prospective longitudinal study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(8):1533–1540. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Chen Z. Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for optic nerve head surface depression and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in glaucoma patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11677. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90588-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susanna BN, Ogata NG, Jammal AA, Susanna CN, Berchuck SI, Medeiros FA. Corneal biomechanics and visual field progression in eyes with seemingly well-controlled intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(12):1640–1646. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(12):5337–5347. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Mee M, Katiyar S, Pensyl D, Halverson KD, Qualls C. Relative importance of factors affecting corneal hysteresis measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(5):E803–E811. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182504214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitályos G, Kolozsvári BL, Németh G, Losonczy G, Hassan Z, Pásztor D, Fodor M. Effects of aging on corneal parameters measured with pentacam in healthy subjects. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3419. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39234-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):840–849 e842. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizer JS, Stinnett SS, Herndon LW. Longitudinal changes in central corneal thickness and their relation to glaucoma status: an 8 year follow up study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(6):732–736. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.087155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt JD, Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Lin SC, Alexander MY, Kass MA. Changes in central corneal thickness over time: the ocular hypertension treatment study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1550–1556, 1556 e1551. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Shen M, Wang J, Fang A, Xu A, Fang H, Lu F. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(6):e1061-1062. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal DR, Ehrlich JR, Shimmyo M, Radcliffe NM. The relationship between corneal hysteresis and the magnitude of intraocular pressure reduction with topical prostaglandin therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(2):254–257. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.196899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirneiß C, Sekura K, Brandlhuber U, Kampik A, Kernt M. Corneal biomechanics predict the outcome of selective laser trabeculoplasty in medically uncontrolled glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(10):2383–2388. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2416-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolivar G, Sanchez-Barahona C, Teus M, Castejon MA, Paz-Moreno-Arrones J, Gutierrez-Ortiz C, Mikropoulos DG. Effect of topical prostaglandin analogues on corneal hysteresis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(6):e495–e498. doi:10.1111/aos.12689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Zenkel M, Nusing RM. Expression and localization of FP and EP prostanoid receptor subtypes in human ocular tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(5):1475–1487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif NA, Kelly CR, Crider JY, Williams GW, Xu SX. Ocular hypotensive FP prostaglandin (PG) analogs: PG receptor subtype binding affinities and selectivities, and agonist potencies at FP and other PG receptors in cultured cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2003;19(6):501–515. doi:10.1089/108076803322660422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F, Tsukahara S, Lindsey JD. Prostaglandins increase matrix metalloproteinase release from human ciliary smooth muscle cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(13):2772–2780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Lindsey JD, Marchenko G, Marchenko N, Angert M, Strongin A. Prostaglandin FP agonists alter metalloproteinase gene expression in sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(12):4368–4377. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachtschabel U, Lindsey JD, Weinreb RN. The mechanism of action of prostaglandins on uveoscleral outflow. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11(2):112–115. doi:10.1097/00055735-200004000-00008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Toris CB, Gabelt BT, Lindsey JD, Kaufman PL. Effects of prostaglandins on the aqueous humor outflow pathways. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(Suppl 1):S53–S64. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(02)00306-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Lindsey JD, Wang N, Weinreb RN. Increased human scleral permeability with prostaglandin exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(7):1514–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey JD, Crowston JG, Tran A, Morris C, Weinreb RN. Direct matrix metalloproteinase enhancement of transscleral permeability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(2):752–755. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Felletti M, Grasso L, Brusini P. Corneal deformation parameters provided by the Corvis-ST pachy-tonometer in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(8):568–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Du S, Zhang X. Corneal deformation response in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and in healthy subjects analyzed by Corvis ST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(9):5557–5565. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catania F, Morenghi E, Rosetta P, Paolo V, Vinciguerra R. Corneal biomechanics assessment with ultra high speed Scheimpflug camera in primary open angle glaucoma compared with healthy subjects: a meta-analysis of the literature. Curr Eye Res. 2022:1–11. doi:10.1080/02713683.2022.2059809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qassim A, Mullany S, Abedi F, Marshall H, Hassall MM, Kolovos A, Knight LSW, Nguyen T, Awadalla MS, Chappell A, et al. Corneal stiffness parameters are predictive of structural and functional progression in glaucoma suspect eyes. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(7):993–1004. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miki A, Yasukura Y, Weinreb RN, Yamada T, Koh S, Asai T, Ikuno Y, Maeda N, Nishida K. Dynamic Scheimpflug ocular biomechanical parameters in healthy and medically controlled glaucoma eyes. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(7):588–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan ZS, Deshmukh S, Dixit S, Sreenivasaiah S, Shroff S, Devi S, Webers CAB, Rao HL. A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy controls using Corvis ST. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0241296. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva N, Ferreira A, Baptista PM, Figueiredo A, Reis R, Sampaio I, Beirao J, Vinciguerra R, Meneres P, Meneres MJ. Corneal biomechanics for ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and amyloidotic glaucoma: a comparative study by Corvis ST. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:71–83. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S350029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Rehman S, Vallabh NA, Batterbury M, Czanner G, Choudhary A, Cheeseman R, Elsheikh A, Willoughby CE. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(1):121–126. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujishiro T, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, Murata H, Tokumo K, Nakakura S, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R. The relationship between Corvis ST tonometry parameters and ocular response analyzer corneal hysteresis. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(6):479–484. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(8):3262–3268. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzagorta-Aresti A, Perez-Lopez M, Palacios-Pozo E, Davo-Cabrera J. Relationship between corneal hysteresis and lamina cribrosa displacement after medical reduction of intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;101(3):bjophthalmol-2015-307428–294. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Ethier CR. Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):4189–4199. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal IA, Yang H, Roberts MD, Grimm JL, Burgoyne CF, Demirel S, Downs JC. IOP-induced lamina cribrosa deformation and scleral canal expansion: independent or related? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):9023–9032. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeimer RC, Ogura Y. The relation between glaucomatous damage and optic nerve head mechanical compliance. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(8):1232–1234. doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020298042.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimball EC, Nguyen C, Steinhart MR, Nguyen TD, Pease ME, Oglesby EN, Oveson BC, Quigley HA. Experimental scleral cross-linking increases glaucoma damage in a mouse model. Exp Eye Res. 2014;128:129–140. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2014.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coudrillier B, Campbell IC, Read AT, Geraldes DM, Vo NT, Feola A, Mulvihill J, Albon J, Abel RL, Ethier CR. Effects of peripapillary scleral stiffening on the deformation of the lamina cribrosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(6):2666–2677. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JA, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Jain SG. Evaluating the relationship of intraocular pressure and anterior chamber volume with use of prostaglandin analogues. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(5):421–427. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA, Taylor D. Ocular response analyzer. In Roberts CJ, Liu J (Ed). Corneal biomechanics: from theory to practice. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki S, Murata H, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, Nakakura S, Nakao Y, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R. The relationship between the waveform parameters from the ocular response analyzer and the progression of glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1(2):123–131. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2018.08.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar