Lifeblood of the Party: Motivations for Political Donations in Canada

References

• Ansolabehere, S., J. M. de Figueiredo, and J. M. Snyder Jr. 2003. “Why Is There so Little Money in US Politics?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 105–130. doi:10.1257/089533003321164976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bafumi, J., and M. C. Herron. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members of Congress.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 519–542. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M. 2016. “Donation Motivations: Testing Theories of Access and Ideology.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (1): 148–159. doi:10.1177/1065912915624164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besco, R., and E. Tolley. 2020. “Ethnic Group Differences in Donations to Electoral Candidates.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (5): 1072–1094. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1804339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner, A. 2011. Platform or Personality? The Role of Party Leaders in Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and J.-F. Daust. 2020. The Motivation to Vote: Explaining Electoral Participation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burden, B. 2000. “Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies.” Political Analysis 8 (4): 389–398. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029823.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, B., and P. Howe. 2014. “Political Donations and Democratic Equality in Canada.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 37 (1): 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Carty, R. K. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” The Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 723–745. doi:10.1017/S0008423902778402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty, R. K. 2004. “Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Imperative.” Party Politics 10 (1): 5–24. doi:10.1177/1354068804039118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P. B., and J. Q. Wilson. 1961. “Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 6 (2): 129–166. doi:10.2307/2390752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. 2015. “Party Membership in Canada.” In Party Members and Activists, edited by E. van Haute and A. Gauja, 50–65. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W. 2018. “Understanding Power Sharing in Political Parties: Stratarchy as Mutual Interdependence between the Party in the Centre and the Party On-The-Ground.” Government and Opposition 53 (2): 205–230. doi:10.1017/gov.2016.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. 2019. “Descriptive Representation in Local Party Associations and Its Implications for Representation in Parliament: Findings from the Canadian Case.” In Do Parties Still Represent?, edited by K. Heidar and B. Wauters, 15–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W., R. S. Katz, and S. Pruysers. 2018. The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties. London: Rowman Littlefileld, ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W., S. Pruysers, and R. Currie-Wood. 2022. The Political Party in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W., and L. Young. 2004. “The Contours of Political Party Membership in Canada.” Party Politics 10 (4): 427–444. doi:10.1177/1354068804043907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W., and L. Young. 2008. “Factors Influencing the Decision of the Young Politically Engaged to Join a Political Party: An Investigation of the Canadian Case.” Party Politics 14 (3): 345–369. doi:10.1177/1354068807088126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W., and L. Young. 2011. “Explaining Local Campaign Intensity: The Canadian General Election of 2008.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 553–571. doi:10.1017/S0008423911000497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W., and L. Young. 2015. “Personalization of Campaigns in an SMP System: The Canadian Case.” Electoral Studies 39 (3): 306–315. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francia, P., J. Green, P. Herrnson, L. Powell, and C. Wilcox. 2003. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gimpel, J., F. Lee, and J. Kaminski. 2006. “The Political Geography of Campaign Contributions in American Politics.” The Journal of Politics 68 (3): 626–639. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00450.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerwig, J. 2018. “Money in the Middle: Contribution Strategies among Affluent Donors to Federal Elections, 1980–2008.” American Journal of Sociology 123 (4): 1004–1063. doi:10.1086/694888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidar, K., and K. Kosiara-Pedersen. 2019. “Why Do Members Join Parties?” In Nordic Party Members: Linkages in Troubled Times, edited by M. Demker, K. Heidar, and K. K. Pedersen, 51–72. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, R. N. 2009. An Econometric Analysis of Household Political Giving in the USA. Applied Economics Letters 16 (5): 539–543. doi:10.1080/13504850601032131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. 2010. “Individual Contributions: A Fundraising Advantage for the Ideologically Extreme?” American Politics Research 38 (5): 890–908. doi:10.1177/1532673X09357500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. 2013. Political Giving: Making Sense of Individual Campaign Contributions. Boulder: First Forum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, J. A., and D. Brockington. 2005. “Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries.” The Journal of Politics 67 (3): 825–840. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00341.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRaja, R. J., and D. L. Wiltse. 2012. “Don’t Blame Donors for Ideological Polarization of Political Parties: Ideological Change and Stability among Political Contributors, 1972-2008.” American Politics Research 40 (3): 501–530. doi:10.1177/1532673X11429845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc, D., and T. Cardoso. 2019. “PM Vets Potential Judges with Private Liberal Database.” Globe and Mail, April 24.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, K., and C. Panagopoulos. 2011. Filled Coffers: Campaign Contributions and Contributors in the 2008 Elections. Journal of Political Marketing 10 (1–2): 43–57. doi:10.1080/15377857.2011.540193.
   Google Scholar
• Magleby, D. B., Goodliffe, J., and Olsen, J. A. 2018. Who Donates in Campaigns?: The Importance of Message, Messenger, Medium, and Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, M., S. Pruysers, N. Goodman, and Z. Spicer. 2020. “Survey Recruitment Messages and Reported Turnout – An Experimental Study.” Journal of Public Opinion, Elections, & Parties 32 (2): 322–338. Online First. doi:10.1080/17457289.2020.1730380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, N., A. Sayers, and C. Alcantara. 2021. “Political Donations and the Gender Gap During COVID-19.” Party Politics. Access on December 17, 2022. doi:10.1177/13540688211047768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, B. 2020. “Past Liberal Donors Still Favoured for Judicial Appointments under Trudeau Tories Allege with New Data.” Post Media News, December 11. Accessed on November 4, 2022. https://www.saltwire.com/newfoundland-labrador/news/canada/past-liberal-donors-still-favoured-for-judicial-appointments-under-trudeau-tories-allege-with-new-data-530014/
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T., and P. Webb, eds. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruysers, S., and J. Blais. 2019. “Narcissistic Women and Cash-strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Office?” Political Research Quarterly 72 (1): 229–242. doi:10.1177/1065912918786040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruysers, S., and W. Cross. 2016. “Negative Personalization: Party Leaders and Party Strategy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 539–558. doi:10.1017/S0008423916000779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, R. 2019. “More Donors, Smaller Donations: How Fundraising Has Changed in Canada.” CBC News, October,18. Accessed November 4, 2022. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/elections-canada-data-donors-increase-1.5322682
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. E. 2015. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., S. Verba, and H. E. Brady. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyd, P., and P. Whiteley. 1992. Labour’s Grassroots: The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidney, V., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, L. B., and J. Crête. 2011. “Studying Political Behavior: A Comparison of Internet and Telephone Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23 (1): 24–55. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, L. B., A. Harell, D. Rubenson, and P. J. Loewen. 2020. “2019 Canadian Election Study - Online Survey.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. Accessed 9 November 2022. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DUS88V
   Google Scholar
• Tolley, E., R. Besco, and S. Sevi. 2020. “Who Controls the Purse Strings? A Longitudinal Study of Gender and Donations in Canadian Politics.” Politics and Gender 18 (1): 244–272. doi:10.1017/S1743923X20000276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., and W. Cross. 2002. “Incentives to Membership in Canada’s Political Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (3): 547–569. doi:10.1177/106591290205500303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., and H. Jansen. 2011. “Reforming Party and Election Finance in Canada.” In Money, Politics and Democracy: Canada’s Party Finance Reforms, edited by L. Young and H. J. Jansen, 1–18. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zittel, T., and T. Gschwend. 2008. “Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections.” West European Politics 31 (5): 978–1003. doi:10.1080/01402380802234656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar