Commuting choices and residential built environments in Sweden, 1990–2010: a multilevel analysis

References

• Amcoff, John (2009). Rapid regional enlargement in Sweden: A phenomenon missing an explanation. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 91, 275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apparicio, Philippe, Abdelmajid, Mohamed, Riva, Mylene, & Shearmur, Richard (2008). Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(1), 7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boarnet, Marlon G., & Crane, Randall (2001). The influence of land use on travel behaviour: Specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(9), 823–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Xinyu, Mokhtarian, Patricia L., & Handy, Susan L. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self‐selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, Robert (1996). Jobs-housing balance revisited: Trends and impacts in the San Francisco bay area. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 492–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, Robert, & Kockelman, Kara (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2001). White paper: European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide. Luxembourg: EUR-OP.
   Google Scholar
• Congress for the New Urbanism. (1998). Charter of the new urbanism. Retrieved from http://www.cnu.org/sites/www.cnu.org/files/charter_english1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, Kent, Westerlund, Olle, & Åström, Johanna (2007). Flyttning och pendling i Sverige: bilaga 3 till långtidsutredningen 2008 [Migration and commuting in Sweden: Appendix 3 to the Swedish long-term survey 2008]. Stockholm: Fritze.
   Google Scholar
• Elldér, Erik, Gil Solá, Ana, & Larsson, Anders (2012). Featured graphic: Spatial inequality and workplace accessibility: The case of a major hospital in Göteborg, Sweden. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2295–2297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elldér, Erik (2014). Residential location and daily travel distances: The influence of trip purpose. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, Reid, & Cervero, Robert (2001). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 87–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, Reid, & Cervero, Robert (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, Reid, DeAnna, Marybeth, & Li, Shi-Chiang (1996). Land use impacts on trip generation rates. Transportation Research Record, 1518, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Frändberg, Lotta, & Vilhelmson, Bertil (2011). More or less travel: Personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1235–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransson, Urban (1991). Flytta eller pendla: aspekter på hushållens rörlighet [To move or commute: Aspects of household mobility]. Gävle: Statens institut för byggnadsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Gil Solá, Ana (2013). På väg mot jämställda arbetsresor? Vardagens mobilitet i förändring och förhandling [Towards gender equality? Women’s and men’s commuting under transformation and negotiation] (PhD thesis). Institutionen för kulturgeografi och ekonomisk geografi, Handelshögskolan vid Göteborgs universitet, Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliano, Genevieve (1989). Research policy and review 27. New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A, 21(2), 145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Harvey (2011). Multilevel statistical models. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Anne E., Hogarth, Terence, & Shackleton Ruth, E. (1999). Longer distance commuting as a substitute for migration in Britain: A review of trends, issues and implications. International Journal of Population Geography, 5(1), 49–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handy, Susan (1996). Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1(2), 151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, Susan (1982). The determinants of daily travel-activity patterns: Relative location and sociodemographic factors. Urban Geography, 3(3), 179–202.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, Katarina, Holm, Einar, Strömgren, Magnus, Vilhelmson, Bertil, & Westin, Kerstin (2012). Proximity, accessibility and choice: A matter of taste or condition? Papers in Regional Science, 91(1), 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Kelvyn (1991). Specifying and estimating multi-level models for geographical research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 16(2), 148–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura, Ryuichi, Mokhtarian, Patricia L., & Daidet, Laura (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods in the San Francisco bay area. Transportation, 24(2), 125–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, Mei-Po, & Weber, Joe (2003). Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century. Geographical Analysis, 35(4), 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, Becky P. Y., & Lam, Phoenix W. Y. (2011). A multilevel investigation of differential individual mobility of working couples with children: A case study of Hong Kong. Transportmetrica, 9(7), 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat, Kees, Van Wee, Bert, & Stead, Dominic (2005). Land use and travel behaviour: Expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(1), 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh, Simon P., & Nelder, John A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGuckin, Nancy, Zmud, Johanna, & Nakamoto, Yukiko (2005). Trip-chaining trends in the United States: Understanding travel behavior for policy making. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1917, 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, Ruben, & Páez, Antonio (2009). Determinants of distance travelled with a focus on the elderly: A multilevel analysis in the Hamilton CMA, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(1), 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, David (2010). Saturation of demand for daily travel. Transport Reviews, 30(5), 659–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Harvey (2007). Place-based versus people-based geographic information science. Geography Compass, 1(3), 503–535.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, Petter (2005). Residential location affects travel behavior—but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 63(2), 167–257.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, Petter (2009). Residential self‐selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 293–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NUTEK. (2000). Arbetskraftens rörlighet: ett smörjmedel för tillväxt [Labor mobility: A help for economic growth]. Stockholm: NUTEK.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, Marianne, & Lindgren, Urban (2003). Who is the long-distance commuter? Patterns and driving forces in Sweden. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. Retrieved from http://cybergeo.revues.org/4118. doi:10.4000/cybergeo.4118
   Google Scholar
• Openshaw, Stan (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Norwich: Geo Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pontes de Aquino, Aida, & Timmermans, Harry (2010, July). The built environment as a décor of unfolding housing careers and activity travel patterns: Reflection and research agenda. Paper presented at the 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Rasbash, John, Charlton, Christopher, Browne, William J., Healy, Mike, & Cameron, Bruce (2011). MLwiN (Version 2.24) [Computer software]. Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Reneland, Mats (1998). Befolkningens avstånd till service: GIS-projektet tillgänglighet i svenska städer 1980 och 1995 [The population’s distance to services: The GIS project accessibility in Swedish cities in 1980 and 1995]. Göteborg: Rapport - Stads - och trafikplanering, Arkitektur, Chalmers tekniska högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Sandow, Erika (2011). On the road: Social aspects of commuting long distances to work (PhD thesis). Kulturgeografiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• SCB (2005). Geografin i statistiken – regionala indelningar i Sverige [Geography in statistics – regional divisions in Sweden]. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.
   Google Scholar
• SCB (2010). Tätorter 2010 [Built-up areas 2010]. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., Dieleman, Frans M., & Dijst, Martin (2004). The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: A multilevel approach. Growth and Change, 35(3), 304–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, Tim, & Dijst, Martin (2002). Travel-time ratios for visits to the workplace: The relationship between commuting time and work duration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(7), 573–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, Ian, & Gould, Myles (2010). Distance between home and work: A multilevel analysis of individual workers, neighbourhoods, and employment sites in Northern Ireland. Environment and Planning A, 42(5), 1221–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIKA. (2007). RES 2005-2006: Den nationella resvaneundersökningen [RES 2005–2006: the national travel survey]. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.
   Google Scholar
• Snellen, Danielle, Borgers, Aloys, & Timmermans, Harry (2002). Urban form, road network type, and mode choice for frequently conducted activities: A multilevel analysis using quasi-experimental design data. Environment and Planning A, 34(7), 1207–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, Andrea L., Bania, Neil, & Leete, Laura (2011). Comparative approaches to measuring food access in urban areas: The case of Portland, Oregon. Urban Studies, 48(8), 1715–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susilo, Yusak, & Maat, Kees (2007). The influence of built environment to the trends in commuting journeys in the Netherlands. Transportation, 34(5), 589–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swärdh, Jan-Erik (2009). Commuting time choice and the value of travel time (PhD thesis). Örebro Universitet, Örebro.
   Google Scholar
• Van Acker, Veronique., & Witlox, Frank (2011). Commuting trips within tours: How is commuting related to land use? Transportation, 38(3), 465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilhelmson, Bertil (2005). Urbanisation and everyday mobility. Long-term changes of travel in urban areas of Sweden. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. Retrieved from http://cybergeo.revues.org/3536. doi:10.4000/cybergeo.3536
   Google Scholar
• Vilhelmson, Bertil (2007). The use of the car: Mobility dependencies of urban everyday life. In Tommy Gärling & Linda Steg (Eds.), Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 145–164). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Joe, & Kwan, Mei-Po (2003). Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts on individual accessibility: A multilevel approach. Urban Geography, 24(8), 647–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolnik, Edmund J. (2010). Multilevel models of commute times for men and women. In Antonio Páez, Julie L. Gallo, Ron N. Buliung, & Sandy Dall’Erba (Eds.), Progress in spatial analysis (pp. 195–215). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zolnik, Edmund J. (2011). The effect of sprawl on private-vehicle commuting outcomes. Environment and Planning A, 43(8), 1875–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar