Governing cities through participation—a Foucauldian analysis of CityPlan Vancouver

References

• Arnstein, Sherry (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Trevor, & Hutton, Thomas (2009). Situating the new economy: Contingencies of regeneration and dislocation in Vancouver’s inner city. Urban Studies, 46(5–6), 1247–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A., Osbourne, T., & Rose, Nikolas (Eds.). (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, Justin, & Nicholls, Walter (2008). Plural governance, participation and democracy in cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, Mark (1999). Foucault and critique: Deploying agency against autonomy. Political Theory, 27(1), 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeley, Georgina (2010). Governing ourselves: Citizen participation and governance in Barcelona and Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 130–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomley, Nicholas, & Sommers, Jeff (1999). Mapping urban space: Governmentality and cartographic struggles in inner city Vancouver. In Smandych, Russell (Ed.), Governable places: Readings on governmentality and crime control (pp. 261–286). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, Sophie (2011). Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic – communicative divide. Planning Theory, 10(2), 161–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver (1993). CityPlan tool kit. Vancouver: CityPlan Office, Planning Department.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver (1995). CityPlan – directions for Vancouver. Vancouver: CityPlan Office, Planning Department.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver (2003). CityPlan overview. Last modified April 28, 2003, retrieved July 4, 2011, from http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/cityplan/cityplan.htm
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver (2004). Policy report development and building. Subject: Secondary suites. Vancouver: Housing Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, Mitchell (1999). Governmentality. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dikeç, Mustafa (2007). Space, governmentality, and the geographies of French urban policy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(4), 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert, & Rabinow, Paul (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, Sarah (2004). Partnerships and participation: Reconfiguring urban governance in different state contexts. Urban Geography, 25(8), 755–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, Susan (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent (1998). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society? The British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 210–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent, & Richardson, Tim (2002). Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In Allmendinger Philip & Tewdwr-Jones Mark (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, John (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, John (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1970 [1966]). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1972 [1969]). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1973 [1963]). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1977 [1975]). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1978 [1976]). The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1981). Omnes et singulatim: Towards a criticism of ‘political reason’. In McMurrin, S. (Ed.), The tanner lectures of human values (pp. 223–254). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1982). The subject and power. In Dreyfus, Hubert & Rabinow, Paul (Eds.), Michel Foucault. Beyound structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1984). L’ éthique du souci de soi comme practique de liberté. Concordia, Revista Internacional de Filisofia, 6, 99–116 (cited from the German translation in Defert and Ewald, Eds. 2005. Michel Foucault. Analytik der Macht, 2274–2300. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom (interview). In Bernauer, J. & Rasmussen, D. (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (2007 [1978]). Security, territory, population. Lectures at the collège de France 1977–78. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (2008 [1979]). The birth of biopolitics. Lectures at the college de France 1978–79. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, Rose (1996). Building the vision of a city for everyone: Planning in the context of multiculturalism in Vancouver. Newcastle upon Tyne: School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Global Urban Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Jill (2009). Experiential planning: A practitioner’s account of Vancouver’s success. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3), 358–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, Mike, & Cameron, Ken (2007). City making in paradise. Nine decisions that saved Vancouver. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy (1997). Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101–123.
   Google Scholar
• Helbrecht, Ilse (1996). CityPlan Vancouver. Versuche einer Stadtentwicklungspolitik per Bürgerentscheid [Urban development through citizens’ decision]. In Heinritz, Günter, Ossenbrügge, Jürgen, & Wiessner, Reinhard (Eds.), Raumentwicklung und Sozialverträglichkeit. 50. Deutscher Geographentag Potsdam 1995, Band 2 (pp. 123–129). Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, Jean (2003). ‘Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Planning Theory, 2(1), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, Kersty (2009). On a governmentality analytics of the ‘deliberative turn’: Material conditions, rationalities and the deliberating subject. Space and Polity, 13(3), 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Thomas (2004). Post-industrialism, post-modernism and the reproduction of Vancouver’s central area: Retheorising the 21st-century city. Urban Studies, 41(10), 1953–1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, Thomas A. (1994). Vancouver. Cities, 11(4), 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, Thomas A. (2008). The new economy of the inner city. Restructuring, regeneration and dislocation in the twenty-first-century metropolis. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Thomas A. (2010). Economic change in Canadian cities: Locational dynamics of employment. In Bunting, Trudi, Filion, Pierre, & Walker, Ryan (Eds.), Canadian cities in transition. New directions in the twenty-first century (pp. 110–130). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, Margo (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 369–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, Margo (2002). Governmentality, gender, planning. A Foucauldian perspective. In Allmendinger, Philip & Tewdwr-Jones, Mark (Eds.), Planning futures. New directions for planning theory (pp. 136–153). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, Margo (2008). Space and government: Governmentality and geography. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1635–1658.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, Margo (2013). Historicizing planning, problematizing participation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1527–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, Margo, & Yiftachel, Oren (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, Judith Eleanor, & Booher, David E. (2005). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, Judith Eleanor, & Booher, David E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kear, Mark (2007). Spaces of transition spaces of tomorrow: Making a sustainable future in Southeast False Creek, Vancouver. Cities, 24(4), 324–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessl, Fabian, & Krasmann, Susanne (2005). Sozialpolitische Programmierungen [Social policy programming]. In Kessl, Fabian (Ed.), Handbuch Sozialraum (pp. 227–245). Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Lanz, Stephan (2013). Be Berlin! Governing the city through freedom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4), 1305–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Thomas (1997). Eine Kritik der politischen Vernunft – Foucaults Analyse der modernen Gouvernementalität [A critique of political reason – Foucault’s analysis of modern governmentality]. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Thomas (2001). ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Thomas (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Thomas (2005). Nachwort. Geschichte und Erfahrung. Michel Foucault und die Spuren der Macht. In Defert, Daniel & Ewald, Francois (Eds.), Michel Foucault. Analytik der Macht (pp. 317–347). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, David (1980). Liberal ideology and the postindustrial city. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 238–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, David (1994). Gentrification and the politics of the new middle class. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12(1), 53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, David (1996). The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, David, Hiebert, Daniel, & Pratt, Geraldine (1992). Time to grow up? From urban village to world city, 1966–91. In Wynn, Graeme & Oke, Timothy (Eds.), Vancouver and its region (pp. 234–266). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, David, & Tutchener, Judith (2001). Immigration, globalisation and house prices in Canada’s gateway cities. Housing Studies, 16(2), 199–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Elizabeth (2008). The efficacy of long-range physical planning: The case of Vancouver. Journal of Planning History, 7(3), 175–213.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Gordon (2011). Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-democratic city? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2629–2660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbert, Björn (1998). Participatory approaches to sustainable urban development: Reflections on practice in Seattle, Vancouver and Waitakere. Planning Practice and Research, 13(2), 183–189.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, Ann (1995). Vancouver’s CityPlan. People participating in planning. Plan Canada, 35(3), 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, Ann (1997a). CityPlan. In Davis, Chuck (Ed.), The greater Vancouver book (pp. 245–246). Surrey: Linkman Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, Ann (1997b). When theory meets practice – citizen participation in planning. Plan Canada, 37(3), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, Eugene J. (2001). Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. The Professional Geographer, 53(2), 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, Eugene J. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A, 40(4), 885–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, Kim (2008). Transforming Scotland’s public-sector housing through community ownership: The reterritorialisation of housing governance? Space and Polity, 12(2), 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, Kim (2009). Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Katharyne (1993). Multiculturalism, or the united colors of capitalism? Antipode, 25(4), 263–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Katharyne (1996). Visions of Vancouver: Ideology, democracy, and the future of urban development. Urban Geography, 17(6), 478–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Katharyne (1997). Conflicting geographies of democracy and the public sphere in Vancouver BC. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(2), 162–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Katharyne (2001). Transnationalism, neo-liberalism, and the rise of the shadow state. Economy and Society, 30(2), 165–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Katharyne (2004). Crossing the neoliberal line: Pacific Rim migrations and the metropolis. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Olds, Kris (2001). Globalization and urban change: Capital, culture, and Pacific rim mega-projects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pløger, John (2001). Public participation and the art of governance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(2), 219–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pløger, John (2004). Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory, 3(1), 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John (2002). Urban design as public policy: Evaluating the design dimension of Vancouver’s planning system. International Planning Studies, 7(4), 265–282.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John (2004). The Vancouver achievement: Urban planning and design. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, Mark (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quastel, Noah (2009). Political ecologies of gentrification. Urban Geography, 30(7), 694–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas (1996). The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas, & Miller, Peter (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas, O’Malley, Pat, & Valverde, Mariana (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose-Redwood, Reuben (2006). Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 469–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol, Marit (2010). Public participation in post-Fordist urban green space governance: The case of community gardens in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 548–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol, Marit (2013a). Regieren (in) der neoliberalen Stadt. Foucaults Analyse des Neoliberalismus als Beitrag zur Stadtforschung [Governing (in) the neoliberal city. The Foucauldian analysis of neoliberalism as a contribution to urban research]. Geographische Zeitschrift, 101(3–4), 132–147.
   Google Scholar
• Rosol, Marit (2013b). Vancouver’s “Ecodensity” planning initiative: A struggle over hegemony? Urban Studies, 50(11), 2238–2255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol, Marit (2014). On resistance in the post-political city: Conduct and counter-conduct in Vancouver. Space and Polity, 18(1), 70–84.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, T., & Aylett, A. (2008). The work of policy: Actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(4), 627–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelig, Michael, & Seelig, Julie (1997). CityPlan: Participation or abdictation? Plan Canada, 37(3), 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Senellart, Michel (2007). Course context. In Security, territory, population. Lectures at the collège de France 1977–78 (pp. 369–401). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stenson, Kevin (2005). Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain. Theoretical Criminology, 9(3), 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, Paul (1980). Vancouver civic politics. BC Studies, 46, 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tomalty, Ray (1997). The compact metropolis: Growth management and intensification in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal. Toronto, ON: ICURR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomalty, Ray (2002). Growth management in the Vancouver region. Local Environment, 7(4), 431–445.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, David (1994). The guide to effective participation. Brighton: Partnership Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Jeanne M. (2002). Reinventing planning: Canada. Progress in Planning, 57(3–4), 207–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar