Social mix revisited: within- and across-neighborhood ties between ethnic minorities of differing socioeconomic backgrounds

References

• Andreotti, Alberta, Le Galès, Patrick, & Fuentes, Francisco Javier Moreno. (2015). Globalised minds, roots in the City, upper middle classes in European Cities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barwick, Christine. (2016). Social mobility and neighbourhood choice: Turkish-Germans in Berlin. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barwick, Christine. (2017). Are immigrants really lacking social networking skills? the crucial role of reciprocity in building ethnically diverse networks. Sociology, 51(2), 410–428.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, Talja. (2003). Urban Bonds: Social relationships in an inner city neighbourhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, Talja. (2012). Blaming neither the undeserving poor nor the revanchist middle classes: A relational approach to marginalization. Urban Geography, 33(4), 488–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokland, Talja, & Savage, Michael. (2008). Networked Urbanism: Social capital in the city. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, Talja. (2008). Gardening with a Little Help from Your (Middle Class) Friends: Bridging social capital across race and class in a mixed neighborhood. In Talja Blokland & Mike Savage (Eds.), Networked Urbanism: Social Capital in the City (pp. 147–170). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, Talja, & Van Eijk, Gwen. (2010). Do people who like diversity practice diversity in neighbourhood life? neighbourhood use and the social networks of ‘diversity-seekers’ in a mixed neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(2), 313–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, Xavier de Souza, Popkin, Susan J, & Goering, John. (2010). Moving to Opportunity: The Story of an American experiment to fight ghetto poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, Ronald S. (1984). Network Items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Tim. (2003). Living in the Bubble: Gentrification and Its ‘Others’ in North London. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2469–2486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Tim, & Robson, Garry. (2001). Social capital, gentrification and neighbourhood change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2145–2162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, Bridget. (2009). Not just class: towards an understanding of the whiteness of middle-class schooling choice. Ethnic And Racial Studies, 32(3), 424–41. doi:10.1080/01419870802629948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, Claude S., Jackson, Robert Max, Stueve, C. Ann, Gerson, Kathleen, Jones, Lynne McCallister, & Baldassare, Mark. (1978). Networks and Places. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foroutan, Naika, & Schäfer, Isabel. (2009). Hybride Identitäten - Muslimische Migrantinnen und Migranten in Deutschland und Europa [Hybrid identities - Muslim migrants in Germany and Europe]. Aus Politik Und Zeitgeschichte, 5, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, Jürgen, & Triemer, Sascha. (2009). Gespaltene Städte? - Soziale und ethnische Segregation in deutschen Großstädten [Divided cities? - Social and ethnic segregation in German cities]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, Herbert J. (1992). Comment: Ethnic Invention and Acculturation, a Bumpy-Line Approach. Journal of American Ethnic History, 12(1), 42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gestring, Norbert, Janßen, Andrea, Polat, Ayca, & Siebel, Walter. (2004). Die zweite generation türkischer migranten [The second generation of Turkish migrants]. Einblicke, 40, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Sonja. (2010). Soziale Netzwerke und soziales Kapital. Faktoren für die strukturelle Integration von Migranten in Deutschland [Social networks and social capital. Factors for the sociostructural integration of migrants in Germany]. In Markus Gamper & Linda Reschke (Eds.), Knoten und Kanten: Soziale Netzwerkanalyse in Wirtschafts- und Migrationsforschung [Nodes and edges: Social network analysis in economic and migration research] (pp. 247–274). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, Marina. (2008). Mit welchem ziel werden bestehende netzwerke generiert? In Christian Stegbauer (Ed.), Netzwerkanalyse und Netzwerktheorie: Ein neues Paradigma in den Sozialwissenschaften [Network analysis and network theory: A new paradigm in the social sciences] (pp. 295–307). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Mark L., Chaskin, Robert J., & Webber, Henry S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalter, Frank, & Kogan, Irena. (2014). migrant networks and labor market integration of immigrants from the former Soviet Union in Germany. Social Forces, 92(4), 1435–1456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleit, Rachel Garshick. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning A, 37(8), 1413–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, John. (1996). Globalization and the politics of place: Place and identity in an inner London Neighbourhood. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21(1), 194–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallister, Lynne, & Fischer, Claude S. (1978). A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods & Research, 7(2), 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özüekren, Sule, & Ergoz-Karahan, Ebru. (2010). Housing experiences of turkish (im)migrants in berlin and istanbul: internal differentiation and segregation. Journal Of Ethnic And Migration Studies, 36(2), 355–372. doi:10.1080/13691830903387477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattillo-McCoy, Mary. (2000). Black Picket Fences: Privilege and peril among the black middle class. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, David Robert. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Louise, Sales, Rosemary, Tilki, Mary, & Siara, Bernadetta. (2008). Social networks, social support and social capital: The experiences of recent polish migrants in London. Sociology, 42(4), 672–690.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, Robert J. (2012). Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, Robert J, Raudenbush, Stephen W., & Earls, Felton. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, Nina Glick, & Çağlar, Ayse. (2009). Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: Migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 177–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissot, Sylvie. (2015). Good Neighbors: Gentrifying Diversity in Boston’s South End. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, John. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo, Jody Agius. (2012). Barrios to Burbs: The making of the Mexican American middle class. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo, Jody Agius, & Lee, Jennifer. (2009). Brown picket fences the immigrant narrative and `giving back’ among the Mexican-Origin Middle Class. Ethnicities, 9(1), 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, Paul. (2009). Living in an Oasis: Middle-Class disaffiliation and selective belonging in an english suburb. Environment and Planning A, 41(12), 2874–2892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, Barry, & Leighton, Barry. (1979). Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities. Urban Affairs Review, 14(3), 363–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, Barry, & Wortley, Scot. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar