“Let them sing!” The paradoxes of gender mainstreaming in urban policy and urban scholarship

References

• Asselin, H., & Basile, S. (2018). Concrete ways to decolonize research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographers, 17(3), 643–650.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., & Parnell, S. (2018). Spatial rationalities and the possibilities for planning in the new urban agenda for sustainable development. In G. Bhan, S. Srinivas, & V. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to planning in the global south (pp. 25–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, L., & Rose, D. (2003). Constructing gender, constructing the urban: A review of Anglo-American feminist urban geography. Gender, Place and Culture, 10(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369032000114000
   Google Scholar
• Carty, M., & Das Gupta, M. (2015). Solidarity work in transnational feminism: The question of class and location. In J. Sudbury & M. Okazawa-Rey (Eds.), Activist scholarship: Antiracism, feminism, and social change (pp. 95–111). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chant, S. (2013). Cities through a “gender” lens: a golden “urban age” for women in the global South?. Environment & Urbanization, 25(1), 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Chant, S. & McIlwaine, C. (2016). Cities, slums and gender in the global south: Towards a feminised urban future. Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Craig, D., & Porter, D. (2006). Development beyond neoliberalism? Governance, poverty reduction and political economy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D-A., & Craven, C. (2016). Feminist ethnography: Thinking through methodologies, challenges and possibilities. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Derickson, K. D. (2015). Urban geography I: Locating urban theory in the ‘urban age’. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), 647–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esson, J., Noxolo, P., Baxter, R., Daley, P., & Byron, M. (2017). The 2017 RGS-IBG chair’s theme: Decolonizing geographical knowledges, or reproducing coloniality? Area, 49(3), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jad, I. (2007). NGOs: Between buzzwords and social movements. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469781
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (1996). Towards minor theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(4), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1068/d140487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (2001). Hiding the target: Social reproduction in the privatized urban environment. In C. Minca (Ed.), Postmodern geography: Theory and praxis(pp.93–110). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kuttab, E. (2008). Palestinian women’s organizations: Global cooption and local contradiction. Cultural Dynamics, 20(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374008094283
   Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F., Wilson, D., & Salo, K (Eds.). (2015). Cities and inequalities in a global and neoliberalizing world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. (2003). ‘Under western eyes’ revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs, 28(2), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/342914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, C. (2016). Gender transformation in a new global urban agenda: Challenges for Habitat III and beyond. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816662573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullings, B. (2005). Commentary: Post-Colonial encounters of the methodological kind. Southeastern Geographer, 45(2), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2005.0028
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, R., & Lock-Swarr, A. (2010). Introduction: Theorizing transnational feminist praxis. In Amanda Lock Swarr & Richa Nagar (Eds.), Critical transnational feminist praxis (pp. 1–22). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy, L. (2013). Problematizing ‘Knowledge-for-Development’. Development and Change, 44(5), 1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy, L. (2014). NGOs and feminisms in development: Interrogating the ‘southern women’s NGO’. Geography Compass, 8(8), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12150
   Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy, L. (2016). Whose feminism counts? Gender (ed) knowledge and professionalisation in development. Third World Quarterly, 37(12), 2156–2175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1173511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noxolo, P. (2017). Introduction: Decolonising geographical knowledge production in a colonized and re-colonising postcolonial world. Area, 49(3), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. (1981). The politics of reproduction. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B. (2016). Feminist forays in the city: Imbalance and intervention in urban research methods. Antipode, 48(5), 1337–1358. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell, S. (2016). Defining a global urban development agenda. World Development, 78, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake, L. (2016). On feminism and feminist allies in knowledge production in urban geography. Urban Geography, 37(6), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake, L., Koleth, E., Tanyildiz, G., Reddy, R., & Patrick, D. (Eds.). 2021 (in press). A feminist urban theory for our time: Rethinking social reproduction and the urban. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Peake, L., Patrick, D., Reddy, R.N., Sarp Tanyildiz, G., Ruddick, S., & Tchoukaleyska, R. (2018). Placing planetary urbanization in other fields of vision. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(3), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818775198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake, L., & Rieker, M. (eds.). (2013). Rethinking feminist interventions into the urban. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, A., & Pieterse, E. (2017). New urban worlds: Inhabiting dissonant times. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sudbury, J., & Okazawa-Rey, M. (2015). Activist scholarship: Antiracism, feminism, and social change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Temenos, C. (2016). Mobilizing drug policy activism: Conferences, convergence spaces and ephemeral fixtures in social movement mobilization. Space and Polity, 20(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2015.1072913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuhiwai-Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. New urban agenda. United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/17761NUAEnglish.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2018. Sustainable development goals knowledge platform: Sustainable cities and human settlements. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainablecities
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019a). World urbanization prospects 2018: Highlights. United Nations. (ST/ESA/SER.A/421).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019b). World population prospects 2019: Highlights. United Nations. (ST/ESA/SER.A/423).
   Google Scholar
• Wekerle, G. (1984). A women’s place is in the city. Antipode, 16(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1984.tb00069.x
   Google Scholar
• Zinkernagel, R., Evans, J., & Neij, L. (2018). Applying the SDGs to cities: Business as usual or a New Dawn? Sustainability, 10(9), 3201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar