960
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Doing comparative urbanism: comparative conversation as tactic

ORCID Icon
Pages 896-917 | Received 10 Jun 2021, Accepted 23 Feb 2022, Published online: 19 Apr 2022

References

  • Acuto, Michele, Pejic, Daniel, & Briggs, Jessie. (2021). Taking city rankings seriously: Engaging with benchmarking practices in global urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(2), 363–377.
  • Anjaria, Jonathan Shapiro. (2011). Ordinary states: Everyday corruption and the politics of space in Mumbai. American Ethnologist, 38(1), 58–72.
  • Baccaro, Lucio (2006). Civil society meets the state: Towards associational democracy? Socio-Economic Review, 4(2), 185–208.
  • Bang, Henrik. (2005). Among everyday makers and expert citizens. In J. Newman (Ed.), Remaking governance: Peoples, politics and the public sphere (pp. 159–178). Bristol University Press.
  • Burnett, Michael (2009). Using competitive dialogue in EU public procurement. Early Trends and Future Developments. EIPAScope, 2009(2), 17–23.
  • Chatterton, P. (2018). Unlocking sustainable cities. Pluto Press.
  • Chung, Him, & Zhou, Su-Hong (2011). Planning for plural groups? Villages-in-the-city redevelopment in Guangzhou city, China. International Planning Studies, 16(4), 333–353.
  • Clarke, Nick, & Cochrane, Allan (2013). Geographies and politics of localism: The localism of the United Kingdom's coalition government. Political Geography, 34, 10–23.
  • Cox, Kevin R., & Evenhuis, Emil (2020). Theorising in urban and regional studies: Negotiating generalisation and particularity. Cambridge Journal and Regions, Economy and Society, 13(3), 425–442.
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
  • Deville, J., Guggenheim, M., & Hrdličková, Z. (2016). Same, same but different: Provoking relations, assembling the comparator. In J. Deville, M. Guggeinheim, & Z. Hrdličková (Eds.), Practicing comparison (pp. 99–129). Mattering Press.
  • Gallo, Crescenzio, Faccilongo, Nicola, & La Sala, Piermichele. (2018). Clustering analysis of environmental emissions: A study on Kyoto Protocol's impact on member countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3685–3703.
  • Grahame, A. (2015, May 6). The Guardian. Housing network: Councils look to radical alternatives to solve the UK's housing crisis. Retrieved July 30, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/housingnetwork/2015/may/06/Councils-radical-alternative-housing-crisis.
  • Green, G. (2018, July 25). City metric. Fabric: London needs community land trusts–and 2018 could be our year.
  • Guarneros-Meza, Valeria, & Geddes, Mike (2010). Local governance and participation under neoliberalism: Comparative perspectives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 115–129.
  • Hall, Stuart (2011). The neo-liberal revolution. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 705–728.
  • Hart, Gillian (2018). Relational comparison revisited: Marxist postcolonial geographies in practice. Progress in Human Geography, 42(3), 371–394.
  • Heilmann, S., & Perry, E. J. (2011). Embracing uncertainty: Guerrilla policy style and adaptive governance in China. In Elizabeth J. Perry, & Sebastian Heilmann (Eds.), Mao’s invisible hand: The political foundations of adaptive governance in China (pp. 1–29). Harvard University Press.
  • Ho, Peter, & Edmonds, Richard L. (2008). China’s embedded activism. Opportunities and constraints for a social movement. Routledge.
  • Ishkanian, Armine, & Szreter, Simon. (2012).The big society debate: A new agenda for social policy? Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Jacobs, Jane M. (2012). Commentary—comparing comparative urbanisms. Urban Geography, 33(6), 904–914.
  • Jiang, Yanpeng, & Waley, Paul (2020). Who builds cities in China? How urban investment and development companies have transformed Shanghai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(4), 636–651.
  • Karvonen, A. (2018). The city of permanent experiments? In B. Turnheim, P. Kivimaa, & F. Burkhout (Eds.), Innovating climate governance: Moving beyond experiments (pp. 201–215). Cambridge University Press.
  • Kochan, D. (2018). The prospects and challenges of socially engaged urban planning and architecture in contemporary China. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1–14.
  • Lancione, Michele, & McFarlane, Colin (2016). Life at the urban margins: Sanitation infra-making and the potential of experimental comparison. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(12), 2402–2421.
  • Law, John. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Psychology Press.
  • Leitner, Helga, & Sheppard, Eric. (2020). Towards an epistemology for conjunctural inter-urban comparison. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(3), 491–508.
  • Li, Bin, Tong, De, Wu, Yaying, & Li, Guicai (2020). Government-backed ‘laundering of the grey’ in upgrading urban village properties: Ningmeng Apartment Project in Shuiwei Village, Shenzhen, China. Progress in Planning. https://doiorg.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/10.1016/j.progress.2019.100436.
  • Li, Yifei, & Zhong, Xiaohua. (2021). ‘For the People’Without ‘by the People’: People and Plans in Shanghai's Waterfront Development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(5), 835–847.
  • Locality UK. (2017). People power: Findings from the commission on the future of localism: Summary report.
  • Lu, Yiyi. (2005). Environmental civil society and governance in China. Chatham House.
  • Martin, Deborah G., & Pierce, Joseph (2013). Reconceptualizing resistance: Residuals of the state and democratic radical pluralism. Antipode, 45(1), 61–79.
  • Mason, Paul. (2015). Postcapitalism. A guide to our future. Allen Lane.
  • McFarlane, Colin (2010). The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–742.
  • McFarlane, Colin, & Robinson, Jennifer (2012). Introduction—experiments in comparative urbanism. Urban Geography, 33(6), 765–773.
  • McMichael, Philip. (1990). Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: An alternative comparative method. American Sociological Review, 385–397.
  • Myers, Garth (2014). From expected to unexpected comparisons: Changing the flows of ideas about cities in a postcolonial urban world. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 35(1), 104–118.
  • Peck, Jamie (2015). Cities beyond compare? Regional Studies, 49(1), 160–182.
  • Peck, Jamie, & Theodore, Nik. (2007). Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 731–772.
  • Poulter, Ed. (2012). On the ground. The Localism Act in practice. Retrieved May 27, 2021. https://cupdf.com/document/on-the-ground-the-localism-act-in-practice-ed-poulter-56acec85a80d4.html.
  • Robinson, Jennifer (2011). Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 1–23.
  • Robinson, Jennifer (2016a). Comparative urbanism: New geographies and cultures of theorizing the urban. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 187–199.
  • Robinson, Jennifer (2016b). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 3–29.
  • Robinson, Jennifer (2021). Comparative urbanism: Tactics for global urban studies. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Roy, Ananya (2009). The 21st-century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6), 819–830.
  • Roy, Ananya, & Ong, Aihwa. (2011). Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global. John Wiley and Sons.
  • Sayīn, Özgür, Hoyler, Michael., & Harrison, John. (2022). Doing comparative urbanism differently: Conjunctural cities and the stress-testing of urban theory. Urban Studies, 59(2), 263–280.
  • Schindler, Seth (2014). Understanding urban processes in flint, michigan: Approaching ‘subaltern urbanism’ inductively. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 791–804.
  • Simone, Abdulmaliq. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407–429.
  • Stengers, Isabelle (2011). Comparison as a matter of concern. Common Knowledge, 17(1), 48–63.
  • Teo, Shaun S. K. (2021). Shared projects and symbiotic collaborations: Shenzhen and London in comparative conversation. Urban Studies.
  • Tilly, Charles. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Ward, Kevin (2010). Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(4), 471–487.
  • Williams, Andrew, Goodwin, Mark, & Cloke, Paul (2014). Neoliberalism, big society, and progressive localism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(12), 2798–2815.
  • Williams, Olivia R., & Pierce, Joseph (2017). Inserting scales of urban politics: The possibilities of meso-urban governance shims. Urban Geography, 38(6), 795–812.
  • Wood, Astrid (2020). Tracing urbanism: Methods of actually doing comparative studies in Johannesburg. Urban Geography, 41(2), 293–311.
  • Wu, Fulong (2018). Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies, 55(7), 1383–1399.
  • Wu, Yuzhe, Luo, Jiaojiao, Zhang, Xiaoling, & Skitmore, Martin (2016). Urban growth dilemmas and solutions in China: Looking forward to 2030. Habitat International, 56, 42–51.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.