977
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Sourcing and commodifying knowledge for investment and development in cities

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1211-1228 | Received 13 Nov 2020, Accepted 11 Feb 2022, Published online: 11 May 2022

References

  • Aalbers, Manuel B. (2016). The financialization of housing: A political economy approach. Routledge.
  • Abbott, Kenneth W., Levi-Faur, David, & Snidal, Duncan. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 14–35.
  • Adams, David, Leishman, Chris, & Watkins, Craig. (2012). Housebuilder networks and residential land markets. Urban Studies, 49(4), 705–720.
  • Ballard, Richard, & Harrison, Philip. (2020). Transnational urbanism interrupted: A Chinese developer’s attempts to secure approval to build the ‘New York of Africa’ at Modderfontein, Johannesburg. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(2), 383–402.
  • Bitterer, Nadine, & Heeg, Susanne. (2012). Implementing transparency in an Eastern European Office market: Preparing Warsaw for global investments. Articulo – Journal of Urban Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.2139
  • Brill, Frances N., & Robin, Enora. (2020). The risky business of real estate developers: Network building and risk mitigation in London and Johannesburg. Urban Geography, 41(1), 36–54.
  • Callon, Michel. (1998). Actor-network theory: The market test. The Sociological Review, 46(S1), 181–195.
  • Callon, Michel. (2021). Markets in the making – Rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. Zone Books.
  • Callon, Michel, & Muniesa, Fabian. (2005). Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.
  • Charney, Igal. (2003). Spatial fix and spatial substitutability practices among Canada’s largest office development firms. Urban Geography, 24(5), 386–409.
  • Chiodelli, Francesco. (2012). Re-politicizing space through technical rules. Planning Theory, 11(2), 115–127.
  • Christophers, Brett. (2014). Wild dragons in the city: Urban political economy, affordable housing development and the performative world-making of economic models: Performative world-making of economic models, UK case. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 79–97.
  • Colenutt, Bob. (2020). The property lobby: The hidden reality behind the housing crisis. Policy Press.
  • Crosby, Neil, & Henneberry, John. (2016). Financialisation, the valuation of investment property and the urban built environment in the UK. Urban Studies, 53(7), 1424–1441.
  • De Magalhaes, Claudio, Freire Trigo, Sonia, Gallent, Nick, Scanlon, Kath, & Whitehead, Christine. (2018). Planning risk and development: How greater planning certainty would affect residential development, Article 04968.
  • Ehlenz, Meagan M., Pfeiffer, Deirdre, & Pearthree, Genevieve. (2020). Downtown revitalization in the era of millennials: How developer perceptions of millennial market demands are shaping urban landscapes. Urban Geography, 41(1), 79–102.
  • Elsmore, Sophie. (2020). Strategies of responsibilization: Development contributions and the political role of property developers. Urban Geography, 41(3), 389–408.
  • Fields, Desiree. (2022). Automated landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 160–181.
  • Geva, Yinnon, & Rosen, Gillad. (2018). The regeneration deal: Developers, homeowners and new competencies in the development process. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 96, 10–20.
  • Henneberry, John, & Parris, Simon. (2013). The embedded developer: Using project ecologies to analyse local property development networks. Town Planning Review, 84(2), 227–250.
  • Kitchin, Rob, & Lauriault, Tracey P. (2015). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80(4), 463–475.
  • Lord, Alexander, Burgess, Gemma, Gu, Yiquan, & Dunning, Richard. (2019). Virtuous or vicious circles? Exploring the behavioural connections between developer contributions and path dependence: Evidence from England. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 106, 244–252.
  • McAllister, Patrick, Street, Emma, & Wyatt, Peter. (2016). Governing calculative practices: An investigation of development viability modelling in the English planning system. Urban Studies, 53(11), 2363–2379.
  • Mitchell, Timothy. (2010). The resources of economics: Making the 1973 oil crisis. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 189–204.
  • Østbø Haugen, Heidi. (2018). The unmaking of a commodity: Intermediation and the entanglement of power cables in Nigeria. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1295–1313.
  • Parker, Gavin, Street, Emma, & Wargent, Matthew. (2018). The rise of the private sector in fragmentary planning in England. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), 734–750.
  • Phelps, Nicholas A., & Wood, Andrew. (2018). Promoting the global economy: The uneven development of the location consulting industry. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1336–1354.
  • Property Week. (2019). Top European property services firms ranked by UK turnover (2017). https://www.propertyweek.com/agency-and-salary-survey/top-40-european-property-services-firms-ranked-by-uk-turnover-2017/5090105.article.
  • Raco, Mike, Brill, Frances, & Ferm, Jessica. (2021). Intermediary organisations and the liquid regulation of urban planning in England. In Yvonne Rydin (Ed.), Regulation and planning. Routledge.
  • Raco, Mike, Livingstone, Nicola, & Durrant, Daniel. (2019). Seeing like an investor: Urban development planning, financialisation, and investors’ perceptions of London as an investment space. European Planning Studies, 27(6), 1064–1082.
  • Robin, Enora. (2018). Performing real estate value(s): Real estate developers, systems of expertise and the production of space. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 48, S0016718518301453.
  • Rosen, Gillad. (2017). Toronto’s condo-builders: Development approaches and spatial preferences. Urban Geography, 38(4), 606–625.
  • Rouanet, Hortense, & Halbert, Ludovic. (2016). Leveraging finance capital: Urban change and self-empowerment of real estate developers in India. Urban Studies, 53(7), 1401–1423.
  • Ruming, Kristian James. (2009). Development configurations and planning negotiations: A case of fringe development in Sydney, Australia. Urban Studies, 46(7), 1461–1483.
  • Savills. (2018). UK Housing market update, December 2018. Retrieved November 11, 2021, from https://www.savills.co.uk/research_articles/229130/272559-0.
  • Shrubsole, G. (2019). Who owns England?: How we lost our green and pleasant land, and how to take it back. HarperCollins.
  • Smith, Susan J., Munro, Moira, & Christie, Hazel. (2006). Performing (housing) markets. Urban Studies, 43(1), 81–98.
  • Theurillat, Thierry, Vera-Büchel, Nelson, & Crevoisier, Olivier. (2016). Commentary: From capital landing to urban anchoring: The negotiated city. Urban Studies, 53(7), 1509–1518.
  • Todes, Alison, & Robinson, Jennifer. (2020). Re-directing developers: New models of rental housing development to re-shape the post-apartheid city? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(2), 297–317.
  • van Loon, Jannes. (2016). Patient versus impatient capital: The (non-) financialization of real estate developers in the low countries. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 709–728.
  • Weber, Rachel. (2015). From boom to bubble: How finance built the new Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
  • Weber, Rachel. (2016). Performing property cycles. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(6), 587–603.
  • Wood, Andrew M., & Phelps, Nicholas A. (2020). Mediating local economic development: The place of site selection consultants in industrial recruitment. Economic Development Quarterly, 34(1), 78–84.