Home swapping as a degrowth strategy for housing

References

• Anson, A. (2019). Framing degrowth – The radical potential of tiny house mobility. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 68–79). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnenberger, K. (2021). Can ‘sufficiency’ reconcile social and environmental goals? A Q-methodological analysis of German housing policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09762-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, J. (2019). Meins gegen deins. In: Vonovia SE (Ed.): Wohnen & Gesellschaft – Bauen für eine neue Zeit (pp. 28–29).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A. V., & Deurloo, M. C. (2006). Aging in place and housing over-consumption. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9048-3
   Google Scholar
• Charles, S. L. (2019). A quest for status or a desire to fit in? An examination of suburban “monster homes” as a positional good. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(4), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1478227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucca, R., & Friesenecker, M. (2021). Potential and limitations of innovative housing solutions in planning for degrowth: The case of Vienna. Local Environment, 27(4), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1872513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Die Landeseigenen (Die sechs landeseigenen Wohnungsbaugesellschaften Berlins). (2018). Wohnungstausch - Ihr Weg zum neuen Zuhause.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., & Sjösstrand, J. (2007). On two theorems of Quinzii and rent controlled housing allocation in Sweden. International Game Theory Review, 9(3), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198907001576
   Google Scholar
• Ferreri, M. (2019). Refurbishment vs demolition? Social housing campaigning for degrowth. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 109–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forno, F., & Garibaldi, R. (2015). Sharing economy in travel and tourism: The case of home-swapping in Italy. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 16(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2015.1013409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutzon Larsen, H., & Lund Hansen, A. (2015). Commodifying Danish housing commons. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, 97(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, E., & Nowicki, M. (2020). Get smaller”? Emerging geographies of micro-living. Area, 52(3), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HDB (Housing & Development Board). (2022). Silver Housing Bonus. https://www.hdb.gov.sg/residential/living-in-an-hdb-flat/for-our-seniors/monetising-your-flat-for-retirement/silver-housing-bonus.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlin, L. (2019). Mietshäuser Syndikat – Collective ownership, the ‘housing question’ and degrowth. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 233–243). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2015). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change – Working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2011). Saving space, sharing time: Integrated infrastructures of daily life in cohousing. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(3), 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., Demaria, F., & D’Alisa, G. (2015). Introduction: Degrowth. In G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth – A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kerschner, C. (2010). Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khmara, Y., & Kronenberg, J. (2020). Degrowth in the context of sustainability transitions: In search of a common ground. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 122072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietaert, M. (2010). Cohousing's relevance to degrowth theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 576–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalsen, S. (2020). ‘Generation share’: Digitalized geographies of shared housing. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1466355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mete, S., & Xue, J. (2021). Integrating environmental sustainability and social justice in housing development: Two contrasting scenarios. Progress in Planning, 151, 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2020.100504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2019). Housing for growth narratives. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (eds.). (2019a). Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (2019b). Summary and research futures for housing for degrowth. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 256–264). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penfold, H., Waitt, G., & McGuirk, P. (2018). Portrayals of the tiny house in electronic media: Challenging or reproducing the Australian dream home. Australian Planner, 55(3–4), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J. (2020). Making climate urbanism from the grassroots: Eco-communities, experiments and divergent temporalities. In V. Castán Broto, E. Robin, & A. While (Eds.), Climate urbanism – Towards a critical research agenda (pp. 227–242). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roquette, P. (1927). Das Wesen des Wohnungstauschvertrages. Juristische Rundschau, 3(8), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1515/juru.1927.1927.8.225
   Google Scholar
• SAGA (2022). Wohnungstauschbörse. https://www.saga.hamburg/fuer-unsere-mieter/meine-saga/wohnungstauschboerse.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F. (2021). Towards an urban degrowth: Habitability, finity and polycentric autonomism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(5), 1076–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20981391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, F. (2019). Housing for degrowth narratives. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 14–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., & Nelson, A. (2019). ‘Open localism’ – on Xue and Vansintjan III. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 223–230). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, C. (2010). Post-Wachstums-Ökonomien – (k)ein Thema für die Wirtschaftsgeographie? Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 56(4), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2012.0018
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, M. (1991). Der Tauschwohnungsmarkt in der zentralistischen Planwirtschaft - das Beispiel von Ostberlin. In: Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Eds), ISR-Forschungsberichte (Vol. 3).
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, H., & Burton, P. (2019). Towards a typology of tiny houses. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1487879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefánsdóttir, H., & Xue, J. (2019). The quality of small dwellings in a neighbourhood context. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 171–182). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, J. (2019). Housing for degrowth – space, planning and distribution. In A. Nelson, & F. Schneider (Eds.), Housing for degrowth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities (pp. 185–195). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, J. (2021). Urban planning and degrowth: A missing dialogue. Local Environment, 27(4), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1867840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019 – Highlights.
   Google Scholar