Dialogic practices of urban gardening in Rome: “Reading for difference” in social innovation

References

• Adams, D., Hardman, M., & Larkham, P. (2014). Exploring guerrilla gardening: Gauging public views on the grassroots activity. Local Environment, 20(10), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.980227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambiente Italia. (2013, October 19). TGR Rai, https://www.rai.it/dl/RaiTV/programmi/media/ContentItem-9ed9deb4-3052-4b7f-a5eb-d90d1c4f26d1-tgr.html#
   Google Scholar
• Apostolopoulou, E., & Kotsila, P. (2022). Community gardening in Hellinikon as a resistance struggle against neoliberal urbanism: Spatial autogestion and the right tothe city in post-crisis Athens, Greece. Urban Geography, 43(2), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1863621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, P., Haxeltinee, A., Kempc, R., Jørgensenf, M. S., Baulerb, T., Ruijsinkg, S., & O'Riordan, T. (2019). Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Kemp, R., & Haxeltine, A. (2017). Game-changers and transformative social innovation. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09897-220441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, C. E., & McClintock, N. (2021). Reclaiming the city one plot at a time? DIY garden projects, radical democracy, and the politics of spatial appropriation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(5), 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420974023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P. (2005). Everyday makers and expert citizens: Active participants in the search for a new governance. In J. Newman (Ed.), Remaking governance (pp. 159–179). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baudry, S. (2012). Reclaiming urban space as resistance: The infrapolitics of gardening. Revue Française D’études Américaines, n° 131(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.131.0032
   Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. (2012). Politics in the city-inside-out. City & Society, 24(2), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2012.01071.x
   Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L., & Stallone, S. (2020). Focalizing new-fascism: Right politics and integralisms in contemporary Italy. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419871303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisso, M. (2020, May 9). Il verde di Roma, Zappata Romana lancia l'appello: Un orto per quartiere, così coltiviamo la città. La Repubblica.
   Google Scholar
• Bragaglia, F. (2021). Social innovation as a ‘magic concept for policy-makers and its implications for urban governance. Planning Theory, 20(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220934832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S., & Zimmer, A. (2016). Social innovation: A sympathetic and critical interpretation. In T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social innovations in the urban context (pp. 3–18). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2005). Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City, 9(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810500092106
   Google Scholar
• Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvet-Mir, L., & March, H. (2019). Crisis and post-crisis urban gardening initiatives from a Southern European perspective: The case of Barcelona. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417736098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. (2013). Critical social innovation in the smart city era for a city-regional European horizon 2020. P3T Journal of Public Policies & Territories, Social Innovation and Territory, 6, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Capponi, A. (2013, April 27). Dal computer alla vanga: Un orto per rinascere. Corriere della Sera.
   Google Scholar
• Celata, F., & Lucciarini, S.2016). Atlante delle disuguaglianze a Roma. Camera di Commercio.
   Google Scholar
• Certomà, C., Chelleri, L., & Notteboom, B. (2020). The ‘fluid governance’ of urban public spaces: Insights from informal planning practices in Rome. Urban Studies, 57(5), 976–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certomà, C., Cioli, S., & D’Eusebio, L. (2019). Coltivare la città. https://crowdusg.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/coltivare-la-cittacc80-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Certomà, C., & Martellozzo, F. (2019). Cultivating justice? A spatial exploration of urban gardening crossing spatial and environmental injustice conditions. Applied Geography, 106, 60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certomà, C., Sonderman, M., & Noori, S. (2019). Urban gardening and the quest for just uses of space in Europe. In C. Certomà, M. Sonderman, & S. Noori (Eds.), Urban gardening and the struggles of social and spatial justice (pp. 1–20). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambon, J. L., Alix, D., & Devevey, J. M. (1982). Les innovations sociales. Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Cockayne, D. G. (2016). Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 77, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colletti, G. (2013, July 19). Orto collettivo: i 50enni cassintegrati che non si arrendono. Il Fatto Quotidiano.
   Google Scholar
• Corsín Jiménez, A. (2014). The right to infrastructure: A prototype for open source urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 342–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, J., Cumbers, A., McMaster, R., & Shaw, D. (2016). Contesting neoliberal urbanism in Glasgow’s community gardens: The practice of DIY citizenship. Antipode, 48(4), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Antonio, S. (2019). Gli orti urbani che mettono al centro le persone a Roma: Viaggio tra le esperienze di Ru:rban, EU UrbanAct. https://urbact.eu/gli-orti-urbani-che-mettono-al-centro-le-persone-roma-viaggio-tra-le-esperienze-di-rurban
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, P. (2014). Governing the social through ‘social entrepreneurship': A foucauldian view of ‘the art of governing’ in advanced liberalism. In H. Douglas (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: Concepts in context (pp. 55–72). Tilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Feliciantonio, C., & O'Callaghan, C. (2020). Struggles over property in the ‘post-political’ era: Notes on the political from Rome and Dublin. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419870812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A., & Prazniak, R. (2001). Introduction: Cultural identity and the politics of place. In R. Prazniak & A. Dirlik (Eds.), Places and politics in an age of globalization. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, G. (2018). The help-yourself city: Legitimacy and inequality in DIY urbanism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E., & Alcántara, E. (2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, 29, 672–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eizenberg, E. (2012). Actually existing commons: Three moments of space of community gardens in New York city. Antipode, 44(3), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00892.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2006). Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbert, J., van Zoonen, L., & Hirzalla, F. (2019). Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 142, 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flachs, A. (2010). Food for thought: The social impact of community gardens in the greater cleveland area. Electronic Green Journal, 1(30), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Follmann, A., & Viehoff, V. (2019). Public-access community gardens: A new form of urban commons? Imagining new socio-ecological futures in an urban gardening project in Cologne, Germany. In C. Tornaghi, & C. Certomà (Eds.), Urban gardening as politics (pp. 66–88). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Froio, C., Gattinara, P. C., Bulli, G., & Albanese, M. (2020). Casapound italia: Contemporary extreme-right politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garrone, L. (2013, August 23). E nel parco dell'Appia Antica rinasce l'Hortus Urbis degli antichi romani. Corriere della Sera.
   Google Scholar
• Gatto, D. (2018). Intervista ai Giardinieri Sovversivi Romani. Irragionevole. https://irragionevole.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/intervista-ai-giardinieri-sovversivi-romani/
   Google Scholar
• George, G., Baker, T., Tracey, P., & Joshi, H. (2019). Handbook of inclusive innovation. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, R., & Pettygrove, M. (2014). Actors and networks in urban community garden development. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 53, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A post capitalist politics. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2020). Reading for economic difference. In J. K. Gibson-Graham, & K. Dombroski (Eds.), The handbook of diverse economies (pp. 476–485). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., & Roelvink, G. (2009). An economic ethics for the Anthropocene. 40th Anniversary Issue of Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 41, 320–346.
   Google Scholar
• Ginn, F., & Ascensão, E. (2018). Autonomy, erasure, and persistence in the urban gardening commons. Antipode, 50(4), 929–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Pianezzi, D. (2017). Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities, 69, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackney, F. (2013). Quiet activism and the new amateur: The power of home and hobby crafts. Design and Culture, 5(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813X13638640370733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddock, S. V., & Tornaghi, C. (2013). A transversal Reading of social innovation in European cities. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), International handbook of social innovation, collective action and transdisciplinary research (pp. 264–273). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, M., Lovemore, C., Magidimisha, H., Larkham, P. J., Scott, A. J., & Armitage, R. P. (2018). Guerrilla gardening and green activism: Rethinking the informal urban growing movement. Landscape and Urban Planning, 170, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J. (2010). Insurgent public space. Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 1. Eut’Orto president, 31.05.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 2. Eut’Orto participant, 31.05.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 3. Zappata Romana gardener, 25.05.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 4. Zappata Romana gardener, 25.05.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 5. Zappata Romana gardener, 10.02.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 6. Giardinieri Sovversivi Romani gardener, 04.06.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R. W. (2020). The quest for uncertainty: Pragmatism between rationalism and sentimentality. In J. Wills, & R. W. Lake (Eds.), The power of pragmatism: Knowledge production and social inquiry (pp. 267–274). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action: Inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409350283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitheiser, S., & Follmann, A. (2020). The social innovation – (re)politicisation nexus: Unlocking the political in actually existing smart city campaigns? The case of Smart City Cologne, Germany. Urban Studies, 57(4), 894–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019869820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorne, C. (2020). The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(4), 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19876941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglavera, T., Niavis, H., Moutsinas, G., Passani, A., & De Rosa, S. (2019). Digital transformation for a better society. EU project ChiC*. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, P., Morgan, K., & Richardson, R. (2018). Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(3), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417717986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J., & Upham, P. (2016). Grassroots social innovation and the mobilisation of values in collaborative consumption: A conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, N. (2014). Radical, reformist, and garden-variety neoliberal: Coming to terms with urban agriculture's contradictions. Local Environment, 19(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.752797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, N., Miewald, C., & McCann, E. (2021). Governing urban agriculture: Formalization, resistance, and re-visioning in two ‘green cities’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, G. (2011). Radical gardening. Frances Lincoln Limited.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2017). Start-ups and the entrepreneurial city. City, 21(2), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1353349
   Google Scholar
• Milbourne, P. (2012). Everyday (in)justices and ordinary environmentalisms. Local Environment, 17(9), 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.607158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milbourne, P. (2021). Growing public spaces in the city: Community gardening and the making of new urban environments of publicness. Urban Studies, 58(14), 2901–2919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020972281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Van Dyck, B. (2013). Framing social innovation research: A sociology of knowledge perspective. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), International handbook on social innovation (pp. 466–479). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mudu, P., & Marini, A. (2016). Radical urban horticulture for food autonomy: Beyond the community gardens experience. Antipode, 50(2), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Paidakaki, A., Moulaert, F., & Broeck, Van den. (2018). Exploring the politico-institutional dimension of social innovation. ISR-Forschungsberichte, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 47.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2014). Pushing austerity: State failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crises of fiscal federalism in the USA. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottinger, L. (2017). Planting the seeds of quiet activism. Area, 49(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudup, M. B. (2008). It takes a garden: Cultivating citizen-subjects in organized garden projects. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 39(3), 1228–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M., & Tyman, S. K. (2019). Cultivating food as a right to the city. In C. Tornaghi, & C. Certomà (Eds.), Urban gardening as politics (pp. 47–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quastel, N. (2009). Political ecologies of gentrification. Urban Geography, 30(7), 694–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabadjieva, M., & Butzin, A. (2022). Emergence and diffusion of social innovation through practice fields. In J. Terstriep, & D. Rehfeld (Eds.), The economics of social innovation (pp. 73–88). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Radio Popolare Roma. (2010, June 10). Intervista ai Giardinieri Sovversivi Romani. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w66pg41WHsk
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K. (2014). Disparity despite diversity: Social injustice in New York City’s urban agriculture system. Antipode, 47(1), 240–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, P. (2019). Community gardening for integrated urban renewal in Copenhagen: Securing or denying minorities’ right to the city? In C. Certomà, M. Sonderman, & S. Noori (Eds.), Urban gardening and the struggles of social and spatial justice (pp. 122–145). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D., & Lloyd, S. (2009). Neo-liberalising corporate social responsibility: A political economy of corporate citizenship. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 40(4), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzkopf, K. (2002). Incommensurability, land use, and the right to space: Community gardens in New York city. Urban Geography, 23(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.23.4.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvi, A. (2012). Roma, Guerrilla Gardening: contro il degrado in città arrivano i giardinieri sovversivi. Cronache Bastarde. https://cronachebastarde.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/roma-guerrilla-gardening-contro-il-degrado-in-citta-arrivano-i-giardinieri-sovversivi/
   Google Scholar
• Spijker, S., & Parra, C. (2018). Knitting green spaces with the threads of social innovation in Groningen and London. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(5–6), 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1382338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J. G., & Tarr, A. R. (2017). Think regionally, act locally? Gardening, cycling, and the horizon of urban spatial politics. Urban Geography, 38(9), 1329–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1232464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2008). Civil society, governmentality and the contradictions of governance-beyond-the-state. In J. Hillier, F. Moulaert, & S. Vicari (Eds.), Social innovation and territorial development (pp. 63–79). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2015). A new mystique? Working for yourself in the neoliberal economy. The Sociological Review, 63(1), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2019). Playing with the rules of the game: Social innovation for urban transformation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(6), 1168–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. (2020). Slow motion revolution or assimilation? Theorizing ‘entryism in destabilizing regimes of inequality. Current Sociology, 68(4), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120907637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornaghi, C., & Certomà, C. (2019). Political gardening, equity and justice: A research agenda. In C. Tornaghi, & C. Certomà (Eds.), Urban gardening as politics (pp. 209–215). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Törnberg, A. (2018). Combining transition studies and social movement theory: Towards a new research agenda. Theory and Society, 47(3), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9318-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, E. (2019). Researching far-right movements: Ethics, methodologies, and qualitative inquiries. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, D. (2007). Guerrilla gardening: A manifesto. New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyck, B., Tornaghi, C., Halder, S., von der Haide, E., & Saunders, E. (2019). The making of a strategizing platform: From politicising the food movement in urban contexts to political urban agroecology. In C. Tornaghi, & C. Certomà (Eds.), Urban gardening as politics (pp. 169–175). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Villaggio95. (2022). Una comunità nella città. https://www.villaggio95.it/
   Google Scholar
• Web TV 2. (2020, July 10). VIII Commissione Urbanistica. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIJxWlbwOsw&t=9s
   Google Scholar
• Windrum, P., Schartinger, D., Rubalcaba, L., Gallouj, F., & Toivonen, M. (2016). The co-creation of multiagent social innovations: A bridge between service and social innovation research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2015-0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyly, E. (2021). Conversational urbanism. Urban Geography, 42(10), 1397–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1940712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappata Romana. (2019). Appello alla sindaca. http://www.zappataromana.net/appello/
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. (2017). Social innovation as a collaborative concept. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1348935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar