Assembling place-based transitions: capitalist logics of green building in Vancouver, Canada

References

• Affolderbach, J., O’Neill, K., & Preller, B. (2019). Global-local tensions in urban green neighbourhoods: A policy mobilities approach to discursive change in Freiburg, Vancouver and Luxembourg. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 101(4), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2019.1681286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Affolderbach, J., & Schulz, C. (2017). Positioning Vancouver through urban sustainability strategies? The Greenest City 2020 Action Plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164(15), 676–685. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.234
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). On assemblages and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820612449261
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016). The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2003). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. SPRU, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Coenen, L., Murphy, J. T., & Truffer, B. (2020). Geographies of transition—From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, A. (2013). Urban green assemblages: An ANT view on sustainable city building projects. Science & Technology Studies, 26(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55306
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. (2015). Renewable city strategy. 2015–2050. Retrieved June 13, 2018, from http://vancouver.ca/files/renewable-city-strategy-booklet-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. (2018). Amendments to the zoning and development by-law – Laneway home regulations. Policy Report RR-1(c).
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmen, J., von Bergmann, J., & Das, M. (2018). Teardown Index: Impact of property values on carbon dioxide emissions of single family housing in Vancouver. Energy and Buildings, 170, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2011). Philosophy and simulation: The emergence of synthetic reason. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., Van Ostaijen, M., van Hulst, M., Escobar, O., & Agger, A. (2022). Working the urban assemblage: A transnational study of transforming practices. Urban Studies, 59(10), 2129–2146. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211031431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farías, I. (2011). The politics of urban assemblages. City, 15(3–4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.595110
   Google Scholar
• Feola, G. (2020). Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidberg, S. (2014). Footprint technopolitics. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 55, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoddousi, P., & Page, S. (2020). Using ethnography and assemblage theory in political geography. Geography Compass, 14(10), 12533. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D. C., & O’Neill, K. J. (2014). Rethinking sociotechnical transitions and green entrepreneurship: The potential for transformative change in the green building sector. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(5), 1088–1107. https://doi.org/10.1068/a46259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., & Wanvik, T. I. (2017). Carbonscapes and beyond: Conceptualizing the instability of oil landscapes. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516648007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, P., & Coenen, L. (2022). Contemporary financial capitalism and sustainability transitions in urban built environments. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J., & Loeber, A. (2016). Exploring the micro-politics in transitions from a practice perspective: The case of greenhouse innovations in The Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 692–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1113514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, M. (2008). The green building market in Canada: Non-residential advances. Ontario Roofing, 34, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lestar, T., & Böhm, S. (2020). Ecospirituality and sustainability transitions: Agency towards degrowth. Religion, State and Society, 48(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2019.1702410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701254308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil, R., & Paterson, M. (2017). Trudeau’s Canada and the challenge of decarbonisation. Environmental Politics, 27(2), 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1414747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.778627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2017). Mobilities, politics, and the future: Critical geographies of green urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(8), 1816–1823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17708876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, N. (2018). Cultivating (a) sustainability capital: Urban agriculture, ecogentrification, and the uneven valorization of social reproduction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(2), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1365582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2009). Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 40(4), 561–567. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011). The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(4), 649–671. doi:10.1068/d4710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., & Anderson, B. (2011). Thinking with assemblage. Area, 43(2), 162–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., & Schroeder, H. (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2015). Cities beyond compare?. Regional Studies, 49(1), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.980801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preller, B., Affolderbach, J., Schulz, C., Fastenrath, S., & Braun, B. (2017). Interactive knowledge generation in urban green building transitions. The Professional Geographer, 69(2), 214–224. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2017). Local or global policy? Thinking about policy mobility with assemblage and topology. Area, 49(3), 335–341. doi: 10.1111/area.12319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, E., & Hult, A. (2017). The travelling business of sustainable urbanism: International consultants as norm-setters. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(8), 1779–1796. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16686069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change in. In S. Rayner & E. Malone (Eds.), Human choices and climate change (pp. 327–399.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. (2020). What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2003). Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: A role for alternative technology niches? Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 127–135. doi:10.3152/147154303781780623
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2006). Green niches in sustainable development: The case of organic food in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(3), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0514j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2010). ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy, 39(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B. (2008). Society, technology, and region: Contributions from the social study of technology to economic geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(4), 966–985. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UBC. (2018). A pathway to a net positive campus: UBC green building action plan. UBC.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergeest, P., Ponte, S., & Bush, S. (2015). Assembling sustainable territories: Space, subjects, objects, and expertise in seafood certification. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(9), 1907–1925. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15599297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhoff, L. (2015). City stories: From narrative to practice in Vancouver’s Olympic village [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. UBC.
   Google Scholar
• Wilshusen, P. R. (2019). Environmental governance in motion: Practices of assemblage and the political performativity of economistic conservation. World Development, 124, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar