An introduction to the classification of the physiognomic landscape types: methodology and results of testing in the area of Kazimierz Landscape Park (Poland)

References

• Almeida, H., Neto, D. G., Meira, W., & Zaki, M. J. (2012). Towards a better quality metric for graph cluster evaluation. Journal of Information and Data Management, 3(3), 378–393.
   Google Scholar
• Armand, D. L., Preobrażenskij, V. S., & Armand, A. D. (1969). Prirodnye kompleksy i soveremennye metody ich izučenia. Izdanije Akademii Nauk SSSR, 5, 96–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, O. (2008). Landscape classification – Between fact and fiction. The Problems of Landscape Ecology, 20, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (1999). Landscape pattern. Perceptron and processes. London: Spon Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2001). Elements of visual design in the landscape. London: Spon Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanowski, J. (1976). Composition and planning in landscape architecture (in Polish). Zakład Narodowy im Ossolińskich. Wrocław: PAN Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanowski, J. (1994). Method of units and architectural-landscape interior (JARK-WAK) in the study and designing (in Polish). Cracow: University of Technology in Cracow. 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cassatella, C., & Peano, A. (Eds). (2011). Landscape indicators: Assessing and monitoring landscape quality. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Saunders, S., Brosofske, K., & Crow, T. R. (Eds.). (2006). Ecology of hierarchical landscapes: From theory to application. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, T. J. (2012). Landscape systems. Structure-functioning – Planning (in Polish). Warsaw: PWN Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, T. J., & Kułak, A. (2014). Physiognomic structure of landscape (in Polish). In W. Ziaja & M. Jodłowski (Eds.), The structure of the natural environment and landscape physiognomy (pp. 33–52). Cracow: Jagiellonian University Institute of Geography and Spatial Management.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, T. J., & Solon, J. (1996). Natural basic spatial units of Kampinos National Park: Rules to distinguish and guidelines for the protection (in Polish). In M. Kistowski (Ed.), Ecological landscape research in protected areas. The problems of landscape ecology (pp. 2, 130–142). Gdańsk: The University of Gdańsk, Polish Association of Landscape Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, T. J., & Sowińska, B. (2006). Landscape quality objectives for roztocze- puszcza solska biosphere reserve: Assessment and conservation issues (in Polish). In W. Wołoszyn (Ed.), Cultural landscape - characteristics, values, protection. The problems of landscape ecology (pp. 18, 49–58). Warsaw: Department of Environmental Protection in Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. Polish Association of Landscape Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, T. J., Sowińska-Świerkosz, B., Kułak, A., & Chmielewski, S. (2014). Landscapes of Roztocze: Natural and cultural heritage (in Polish). Lublin: University of Life Sciences in Lublin.
   Google Scholar
• CODGiK. (2009). Orthophotomap of the Kazimierz Landscape Park area made in 2009, with ground sample distance resolution of 0.5 m. Digital data made available for the needs of this project. Centralny Ośrodek Dokumentacji Geodezyjnej i Kartograficznej Głównego Urzędu Geodezji i Kartografii [Main Documentation Centre of Geodesy and Cartography of the Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography, http://www.serwisy.codgik.gov.pl [accessed 2014 May 11]
   Google Scholar
• Corbelle-Rico, E., & Tubio Sanches, J. M. (2017). Mapping landscape units in Galicia (Spain): A first step for assessment and management? Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 3(1), 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, J., & Bick Hirsch, A. (Eds.). (2014). The landscape imagination: Collected essays of James Corner 1990–2010. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eetvelde, V. V., & Antrop, M. (2009). A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterisation for trans-regional integration, applied in the federal state of Belgium. Landscape & Urban Planning, 91, 160–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Landscape Convention. (2000, October 20). Florence. Retrieved September 19, 2014, from www.coe.int/europeanlandscapeconvention.
   Google Scholar
• Farina, A. (2006). Principles and methods in landscape ecology: Towards a science of the landscape (pp. 1–412). The Netherlands: Springer; Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, M. J., Drapeau, P., & Jacquez, G. M. (1996). Quantification of the spatial co-occurrences of ecological boundaries. Oikos, 77(1), 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Ode, Å., & Velarde, M. E. (2009). The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9, 933–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor, M. (2015). Delineation of landscape units with using cluster analysis: The case study of Malé Karpaty Mountains. Geographia Cassoviensis, 9(2), 108–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, J. (2002). Fine scale profile of CORINE Land Cover classes with LUCAS data: Focusing on the European area frame survey LUCAS. EUR Report 20521 EN. European Communities. Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821–7826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, G. (1964). Landschaftsőkologische Defailunterschung und naturraumliche Gliederung. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 1–2, 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Harasimiuk, M., Domonik, A., Machalski, M., Pinińska, J., Warowna, J., & Szymkowiak, A. (2011). Vistula River Gorge in Małopolska – Project of the geopark (in Polish). The Geographical Review, 59(5), 405–416.
   Google Scholar
• Harasimiuk, M., Warowna, J., & Gajek, G. (2013). The diversity of landscapes of the proposed geopark Vistula River Gorge in Małopolska (in Polish). Monitoring of Environment, 14, 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hehl-Lange, S. (2001). Structural elements of the visual landscape and their ecological functions. Landscape & Urban Planning, 54, 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huzui, A. E., Calin, I., & Patru-Stupariu, I. (2012). Spatial pattern analyses of landscape using multi-temporal data sources. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 14, 98–110.
   Google Scholar
• IMGW. (2007). Map of Hydrographic Division of Poland (1:50,000). Retrieved June 15, 2013, from https://danepubliczne.imgw.pl/#dane-hydrologiczne
   Google Scholar
• Kondracki, J. (2002). Regional geography of Poland (in Polish). Warsaw: PWN Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kucharczyk, M. (1998). The map of actual vegetation (1: 25,000), management of the Kazimierz Landscape Park from resources accumulated for the purposes of development of a protection plan for the Park.Lublin: Management of Lublin Landscape Parks in Lublin
   Google Scholar
• Kucharczyk, M. (2010). The diversity of the vascular flora in the Vistula river valley in Lublin region and its conservation problems. M. Kucharczyk, Ed., The problems of protection and restoration of large river valleys in Europe (in Polish) (pp. 85–90). Lublin: UMCS: Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kulczyk, S. (2008). The methodological problems of landscape classification for the purpose of ecotourism. The Problems of Landscape Ecology, 20, 143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Lü, Y., Feng, X., Chen, L., & Fu, B. (2013). Scaling effects of landscape metrics: A comparison of two methods. Physical Geography, 34(1), 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E. (2002). FRAGSTATS v3: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Retrieved July 8, 2013, from http://wwwumass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mücher, C. A., Klijn, J. A., Wascher, D. M., & Schaminée, J. H. J. (2010). A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 10, 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natura 2000 Areas. (2000). Retrieved February 12, 2015, from http://natura2000.gdos.gov.pl/datafiles.
   Google Scholar
• Niesterowicz, J., & Stępiński, T. (2013). Regionalization of multi-categorical landscapes using machine vision methods. Applied Geography, 45, 250–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostaszewska, K. (2006). Models of landscape units – Utopia or necessity. Miscellanea Geographica, 12, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Trejo, F. (1993). Landscape response units: Process-based self-organising systems. In R. Haines–Young, D. R. Green, & S. Cousins (Eds.), Landscape ecology and geographic information systems (pp. 87–98). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Perko, D., Hrvatin, M., & Ciglić, R. (2015). A methodology for natural landscape typification of Slovenia. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 55(2), 235–270.
   Google Scholar
• Plexida, S. G., Sfougaris, A. J., Ispikoudis, I. P., & Papanastasis, V. P. (2014). Selecting landscape metrics as indicator of spatial heterogeneity – A comparison among Greek landscapes. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26, 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, T., Krümmelbein, J., Schneider, A., Werner, G., Maurer, T., & Naeth, A. (2012). Initial ecosystem processes as key factors of landscape development – A review. Physical Geography, 33(4), 305–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rąkowski, G. (Ed). (2002). Landscape parks in Poland. Warsaw: Institute of Environmental Protection.
   Google Scholar
• Ramezani, H., & Holm, S. (2011). Sample based estimation of landscape metrics; accuracy of line intersect sampling for estimating edge density and Shannon’s diversity index. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 18, 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. S., & Emanuel, R. E. (2014). Landscape position and spatial patterns in the distribution of land use within the southern Appalachian Mountains. Physical Geography, 35(5), 443–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richling, A., Malinowska, E., & Szumacher, I. (2013). Delimitation of landscape units treated as estimation fields in the modeling of a landscape system. Miscellanea Geographica, 17(4), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Richling, A., & Ostaszewska, K. (2005). Physical geography of Poland. Warsaw: PWN publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Richling, A., & Solon, J. (2011). Landscape ecology. Warsaw: PWN Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roca, Z., Claval, P., & Agnew, J. (2011). Landscapes, identities, and development. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitchüsen, J. (1973). Ökologishe Aspekte der Landschaftsforschung. In M. Ružička (Ed.), Content and object of the complex landscape research in the protection and formation of human environment (pp. 58–72). Smolenice, Slovakia: ČsAN.
   Google Scholar
• Skalos, J., Weber, M., Lipský, Z., Trpáková, I., Santruckova, M., Uhlirova, L., & Kukla, P. (2011). Using old military survey maps and orthophotography maps to analyse long-term land cover changes case study (Czech Republic). Applied Geography, 31, 426–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, S., & Pinto, J. (2010). Delineation of natural landscape units for Puerto Rico. Applied Geography, 30(4), 720–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowińska, B., & Chmielewski, T. J. (2008). The method of delimitation and the analysis of typological natural-landscape unit diversity of Roztocze and Biłgoraj Plain (in polish). The Problems of Landscape Ecology, 21, 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, S., Chmielewski, T. J., Michalik-Śnieżek, M., & Kułak, A. (2014). Scenic panoramas of Kazimierz Landscape Park. Kaleidoscope GIS, 2, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16, 284–307.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, C. D. (1994). Map algebra: One perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30(1–2), 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweit, M., Ode, Å., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework of analyzing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3), 229–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valles, M., Galiana, F., & Bru, R. (2013). Towards harmonisation in landscape unit delineation: An analysis of Spanish case studies. Landscape Research, 38(3), 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, H., & Fortin, M. J. (2005). Spatial analysis of landscape concepts and statistics. Ecology, 86, 1975–1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, H. (1964). Die Vegetation der Erde in öko-physiologischer Betrachtung. Bd. I. Die Tropischen und subtropischen Zonen. Jena: G. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, H. (1968). Die Vegetation der Erde in öko-physiologischer betrachtung. Bd. II. Die Gemässigten und Arktischen Zonnen. Jena: G. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., & Malanson, G. P. (2013). Patterns of correlation among landscape metrics. Physical Geography, 28(2), 170–182.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Hobbs, R. (Eds.). (2007). Landscape ecology: The state of the science (pp. 271–287). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, I. S. (1989). The land unit – A fundamental concept in landscape ecology and its application. Landscape Ecology, 3, 67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar