322
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Containment aerosol characterization during nuclear power plant severe accident

, , , , &

References

  • Adams, R. 1983. Behaviour of U3O8, Fe2O3, and concrete aerosols in a condensing steam environment. Proceedings of International Meeting on LWR Severe Accident Evaluation, Cambridge, MA.
  • Allelein, H., A. Auvinen, J. Ball, S. Guentay, L. E. Herranz, A. Hidaka, A. V. Jones, M. Kissane, D. Powers, and G. Weber. 2009. State-of-the-art report on nuclear aerosols. No. NEA/CSNI/R(2009)5, Paris, France.
  • Allelein, H., K. Neu, J. Van Dorsselaere, K. Müller, P. Kostka, M. Barnak, B. Matejovic, A. Bujan, and J. Slaby. 2003. European validation of the integral code ASTEC (EVITA). Nuclear Engineering and Design 221(1–3):95–118. doi:10.1016/s0029-5493(02)00346-1.
  • Allen, M. D., O. R. Moss, and J. K. Briant. 1979. Dynamic shape factors for LMFBR mixed-oxide fuel aggregates. Journal of Aerosol Science 10(1):43–48. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(79)90134-4.
  • Bang, Y. S., Park, T. K., Lee, D. Y., Lee, B. C., Lee, S. W., and Kim, H. T. 2014. Severe accident analysis for containment filtered venting system design. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 29–30, 2014.
  • Bunz, H., M. Koyro, and W. Schoeck. 1987. NAUA-MOD5 and NAUA-MOD5-M – Two computer codes for the description of the aerosol behaviour in the containment system of a LWR after a core melt accident. No. KfK-4278, Kernforschungszentrum, Karlsruhe.
  • Clement, B., N. Hanniet-Girault, G. Repetto, D. Jacquemain, A. V. Jones, M. P. Kissane, and P. von der Hardt. 2003. LWR severe accident simulation: Synthesis of the results and interpretation of the first Phebus FP experiment FPT0. Nuclear Engineering and Design 226(1):5–82. doi:10.1016/s0029-5493(03)00157-2.
  • Dehbi, A., D. Suckow, and S. Guentay. 2001. Aerosol retention in low-subcooling pools under realistic accident conditions. Nuclear Engineering and Design 203(2–3):229–241. doi:10.1016/s0029-5493(00)00343-5.
  • Ducret, D., D. Roblot, J. Vendel, and Y. Billarand. 1997. Study on collection efficiency of fission products by spray: Experimental device and modelling. Proceedings of the 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference, Portland, OR, 500–519.
  • Farmer, M. T., S. Lomperski, D. J. Kilsdonk, and R. W. Aeschlimann. 2006. OECD MCCI project final report. No. OECD/MCCI-2005-TR06, OECD, Argonne, IL, USA.
  • Fink, J. K., D. H. Thompson, B. W. Spencer, and B. R. Sehgal. 1992. Aerosols released during large-scale integral MCCI tests in the ACE program. Technical Report, Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Funding organisation: Electric Power Research Inst., Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Firnhaber, M., K. Fischer, S. Schwarz, and G. Weber. 2002. ISP44 - KAEVER experiments on the behaviour of core-melt aerosols in a LWR containment. No. NEA/CSNI/R(2003)5, OECD/NEA/CSNI, Paris, France.
  • Firnhaber, M., T. Kanzleiter, S. Schwarz, and G. Weber. 1996. International standard problem ISP37: VANAM M3-A multi compartment aerosol depletion test with hygroscopic aerosol material. No. NEA/CSNI/R(96)26), OECD/NEA/CSNI, Le Seine Saint-Germain, France.
  • Green, D. W., and R. H. Perry. 2007. Perry's chemical engineers' handbook. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
  • Hidaka, A., M. Igarashi, K. Hashimoto, H. Sato, T. Yoshino, and J. Sugimoto. 1995. Experimental and analytical study on the behavior of cesium iodide aerosol/vapor deposition onto inner surface of pipe wall under severe accident conditions. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 32(10):1047–53. doi:10.1080/18811248.1995.9731813.
  • Hidaka, A., Y. Maruyama, M. Igarashi, K. Hashimoto, and J. Sugimoto. 2000. Experimental and analytical study on aerosol behavior in WIND project. Nuclear Engineering and Design 200(1–2):303–15. doi:10.1016/s0029-5493(99)00328-3.
  • Hilliard, R. K., L. D. Muhlestein, and T. J. Albiol. 1987. Final report of experimental results of LACE test LA2 – Failure to isolate containment. LA-TR-007, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, WA.
  • Hinds, W. C. 1999. Aerosol technology: Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jacquemain, D., S. Bourdon, A. De Bremaecker, and M. Barrachin. 2000. FPT1 final report. No. IPSN PH-PF IP/00/479, IRSN, Cadarache, France.
  • Johnson, D. L., and I. B. Cutler. 1963. Diffusion sintering: I, initial stage sintering models and their application to shrinkage of powder compacts. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 46(11):541–45. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1963.tb14606.x.
  • Jokiniemi, J. 1990. Effect of selected binary and mixed solutions on steam condensation and aerosol behavior in containment. Aerosol Science and Technology 12(4):891–902. doi:10.1080/02786829008959401.
  • Kissane, M. P. 2008. On the nature of aerosols produced during a severe accident of a water-cooled nuclear reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design 238(10):2792–800. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.06.003.
  • Kolditz, J. 1995. GKN I and GKN II: Reactor containment pressure relief and measures against hydrogen energy release in case of severe accidents. Nuclear Engineering and Design 157(3):299–310. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(95)00999-S.
  • Kops, J., G. Dibbets, L. Hermans, and J. F. Van de Vate. 1975. The aerodynamic diameter of branched chain-like aggregates. Journal of Aerosol Science 6(5):329–33. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(75)90021-X.
  • Liljenzin, J. O., J. Collen, W. Schock, and F. J. Rahn. 1990. Report from the MARVIKEN-V/DEMONA/LACE workshop. Proceedings of the OECD/NEA Workshop on Aerosol Behaviour and Thermal-Hydraulics in the Containment, CSNI Report No. 176, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France, 26–28.
  • Mäkynen, J. M., J. K. Jokiniemi, P. P. Ahonen, E. Kauppinen, and R. Zilliacus. 1997. AHMED experiments on hygroscopic and inert aerosol behaviour in LWR containment conditions: Experimental results. Nuclear Engineering and Design 178(1):45–59. doi:10.1016/s0029-5493(97)00174-x.
  • Makynen, J. M., J. K. Jokiniemi, E. I. Kauppinen, H. Tuomisto, and T. Routamo. 1998. LWR containment aerosol experiments at Victoria facility: Final report. No. E.C. Report ST-APC(98)-P19, American Association for Aerosol Research, Denver, CO.
  • Morfin, F., J. Sabroux, and A. Renouprez. 2004. Catalytic combustion of hydrogen for mitigating hydrogen risk in case of a severe accident in a nuclear power plant: Study of catalysts poisoning in a representative atmosphere. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 47(1):47–58. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.07.001.
  • Mulpuru, S. R., M. D. Pellow, D. S. Cox, C. E. L. Hunt, and R. D. Barrand. 1992. Characteristics of radioactive aerosols generated from a hot nuclear fuel sample. Journal of Aerosol Science 23:827–30. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(92)90539-8.
  • Payot, F., T. Haste, B. Biard, F. Bot-Robin, J. Devoy, Y. Garnier, J. Guillot, C. Manenc, and P. March. 2011. FPT3 final report. No. DPAM/DIR-2011-206, PHEBUS PF IP/11/589, IRSN, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
  • Petti, D. A., R. R. Hobbins, and D. L. Hagrman. 1994. The composition of aerosols generated during a severe reactor accident: Experimental results from the power burst facility severe fuel damage test 1–4. Nuclear Technology 105(3):334–345.
  • Rust, H., C. Tännler, W. Heintz, D. Haschke, M. Nuala, and R. Jakab. 1995. Pressure release of containments during severe accidents in Switzerland. Nuclear Engineering and Design 157(3):337–52. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(95)01015-A.
  • Schock, W., H. Bunz, R. E. Adams, M. L. Tobias, and F. J. Rahn. 1988. Large-scale experiments on aerosol behavior in light water reactor containments. Nuclear Technology 81(2):139–157.
  • Sherman, M. P. 1984. Hydrogen combustion in nuclear plant accidents and associated containment loads. Nuclear Engineering and Design 82(1):13–24. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(84)90263-2.
  • Sonntag, D. 1994. Advancements in the field of hygrometry. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 3(2):51–66.
  • Wall, I. B., and M. Merilo. 1992. Containment filtration systems tests. No. ACE Phase A, TR-A22, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Zeller, W. 1985. Direct measurement of aerosol shape factors. Aerosol Science and Technology 4(1):45–63. doi:10.1080/02786828508959038.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.