Experimental investigation on thermal conductivity of fly ash nanofluid and fly ash-Cu hybrid nanofluid: prediction and optimization via ANN and MGGP model

References

• Akhgar, A., D. Toghraie, N. Sina, and M. Afrand. 2019. Developing dissimilar artificial neural networks (ANNs) to prediction the thermal conductivity of MWCNT-TiO2/Water-ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid. Powder Technology 355:602–10. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.07.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawi, O. A., N. A. C. Sidik, H. W. Xian, T. H. Kean, and S. N. Kazi. 2018. Thermal conductivity and viscosity models of metallic oxides nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 116:1314–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.09.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariana, M. A., B. Vaferi, and G. Karimi. 2015. Prediction of thermal conductivity of alumina water-based nanofluids by artificial neural networks. Powder Technology 278:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi, A.,. I. M. Alarifi, V. Ali, and H. M. Nguyen. 2019. An experimental investigation on the effects of ultrasonication time on stability and thermal conductivity of MWCNT-water nanofluid: finding the optimum ultrasonication time. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 58:104639. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azmi, W. H., K. V. Sharma, R. Mamat, G. Najafi, and M. S. Mohamad. 2016. The enhancement of effective thermal conductivity and effective dynamic viscosity of nanofluids–a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53:1046–58. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakthavatchalam, B.,. N. B. Shaik, and P. B. Hussain. 2020. An artificial intelligence approach to predict the thermophysical properties of MWCNT nanofluids. Processes 8 (6):693. doi:10.3390/pr8060693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boroomandpour, A., D. Toghraie, and M. Hashemian. 2020. A comprehensive experimental investigation of thermal conductivity of a ternary hybrid nanofluid containing MWCNTs-titania-zinc oxide/water-ethylene glycol (80: 20) as well as binary and mono nanofluids. Synthetic Metals 268:116501. doi:10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcione, M. 2011. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Conversion and Management 52 (1):789–93. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkılıç, A. S., G. Yalçın, B. O. Küçükyıldırım, S. Öztuna, A. A. Eker, C. Jumpholkul, S. Nakkaew, and S. Wongwises. 2018. Experimental study on the thermal conductivity of water-based CNT-SiO2 hybrid nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 99:18–25. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehkordi, B. A. F., and A. Abdollahi. 2018. Experimental investigation toward obtaining the effect of interfacial solid-liquid interaction and base fluid type on the thermal conductivity of CuO-loaded nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 97:151–62. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi, A. H., and A. H. Alavi. 2011. Multi-stage genetic programming: A new strategy to nonlinear system modeling. Information Sciences 181 (23):5227–39. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, A., A. Garg, K. Tai, and S. Sreedeep. 2014. An integrated SRM-multi-gene genetic programming approach for prediction of factor of safety of 3-D soil nailed slopes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 30:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2013.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojjat, M., S. G. Etemad, R. Bagheri, and J. Thibault. 2011. Thermal conductivity of non-Newtonian nanofluids: Experimental data and modeling using neural network. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 54 (5–6):1017–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.11.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, A. M., K. V. Sharma, R. A. Bakar, and K. Kadirgama. 2014. A review of forced convection heat transfer enhancement and hydrodynamic characteristics of a nanofluid. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29:734–43. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamei, M., and I. Ahmadianfar. 2020. A rigorous model for prediction of viscosity of oil-based hybrid nanofluids. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 556:124827. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.124827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, C. G. Ramachandra, and W. H. Azmi. 2020. Experimental determination of thermophysical properties of Indonesian fly-ash nanofluid for heat transfer applications. Particulate Science and Technology 1:1–10. doi:10.1080/02726351.2020.1806971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, C. G. Ramachandra, and M. Gurumurthy. 2020. A CFD study on fly ash nanofluid heat transfer behavior in a circular tube. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1013:012030. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1013/1/012030.
   Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, C. G. Ramachandra, M. Gurumurthy, and R. Raghava. 2021. Numerical study on fly ash–Cu hybrid nanofluid heat transfer characteristics. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1013:012031. 10.1088/1757-899X/1013/1/012031
   Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, C. G. Ramachandra, and M. Gupta. 2020. Thermal performance of fly ash nanofluids at various inlet fluid temperatures: An experimental study. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 119:104926. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, C. G. Ramachandra, and A. A. Minea. 2020. Effect of ball milling on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of Indian coal fly ash nanofluid. Heat Transfer 49 (8):4475–90. doi:10.1002/htj.21836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, C. G. Ramachandra, and B. Panitapu. 2020. Stability and thermophysical properties of fly ash nanofluid for heat transfer applications. Heat Transfer 49 (8):4722–37. doi:Rg/10.1002/htj.21849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, M. Revanasiddappa, C. G. Ramachandra, and S. Akilu. 2020. Thermophysical properties of fly ash–Cu hybrid nanofluid for heat transfer applications. Heat Transfer 49 (8):4491–20. doi:10.1002/htj.21837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, Z. Said, and E. Bellos. 2021. Numerical study on the thermo-hydraulic performance analysis of fly ash nanofluid. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 166:1–13. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-10533-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanti, P., K. V. Sharma, Z. Said, and V. Kesti. 2021. Entropy generation and friction factor analysis of fly ash nanofluids flowing in a horizontal tube: Experimental and numerical study. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 166:106972. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.106972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimipour, A., S. A. Bagherzadeh, A. Taghipour, A. Abdollahi, and M. R. Safaei. 2019. A novel nonlinear regression model of SVR as a substitute for ANN to predict conductivity of MWCNT-CuO/water hybrid nanofluid based on empirical data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 521:89–97. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.01.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodadadi, H., D. Toghraie, and A. Karimipour. 2019. Effects of nanoparticles to present a statistical model for the viscosity of MgO-Water nanofluid. Powder Technology 342:166–80. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koza, J. R., and J. R. Koza. 1992. Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Kurt, H., and M. Kayfeci. 2009. Prediction of thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol–water solutions by using artificial neural networks. Applied Energy 86 (10):2244–8. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, G. A., C. Zilio, E. Ceseracciu, and M. Reggiani. 2012. Application of artificial neural network (ANN) for the prediction of thermal conductivity of oxide-water nanofluids. Nano Energy 1 (2):290–6. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick, S. S., A. Mishra, and L. Kundan. 2013. An investigation into modelling thermal conductivity for alumina–water nanofluids. Powder Technology 233:234–44. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourrajab, R., Ahmadianfar, I., and M. Jamei, Behbahani . 2020. A meticulous intelligent approach to predict thermal conductivity ratio of hybrid nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-10047-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostami, S., D. Toghraie, B. Shabani, N. Sina, and P. Barnoon. 2021. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of MWCNT-CuO/water hybrid nanofluid using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 143 (2):1097–105. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-09458-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhani, B., P. Barnoon, and D. Toghraie. 2019. Statistical investigation for developing a new model for rheological behavior of Silica–ethylene glycol/Water hybrid Newtonian nanofluid using experimental data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 525:616–27. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedi, A. H., M. Akbari, and D. Toghraie. 2018. An experimental study on the rheological behavior of a nanofluid containing oxide nanoparticle and proposing a new correlation. Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 99:285–93. doi:10.1016/j.physe.2018.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, Z., M. A. Abdelkareem, H. Rezk, A. M. Nassef, and H. Z. Atwany. 2020. Stability, thermophysical and electrical properties of synthesized carbon nanofiber and reduced-graphene oxide-based nanofluids and their hybrid along with fuzzy modeling approach. Powder Technology 364:795–809. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedeh, R. N., A. Abdollahi, and A. Karimipour. 2019. Experimental investigation toward obtaining nanoparticles’ surficial interaction with base fluid components based on measuring the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 103:72–82. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, S.,. K. P. Venkitaraj, P. Selvakumar, and M. Chandrasekar. 2011. Synthesis of Al2O3–Cu/water hybrid nanofluids using two-step method and its thermophysical properties. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 388 (1–3):41–8. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahani, M., M. Vakili, and S. Khosrojerdi. 2016. Experimental evaluation and ANN modeling of thermal conductivity of graphene oxide nanoplatelets/deionized water nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 76:358–65. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiara, A. M., S. Chakraborty, I. Sarkar, A. Ashok, S. K. Pal, and S. Chakraborty. 2017. Heat transfer enhancement using surfactant-based alumina nanofluid jet from a hot steel plate. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 89:295–303. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.08.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timofeeva, E. V., J. L. Routbort, and D. Singh. 2009. Particle shape effects on thermophysical properties of alumina nanofluids. Journal of Applied Physics 106 (1):014304. doi:10.1063/1.3155999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toghraie, D., N. Sina, N. A. Jolfaei, M. Hajian, and M. Afrand. 2019. Designing an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to predict the viscosity of Silver/Ethylene glycol nanofluid at different temperatures and volume fraction of nanoparticles. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 534:122142. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.122142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, G., H. Jiang, R. Liu, and Y. Zhai. 2014. Effects of surfactant on the stability and thermal conductivity of Al2O3/de-ionized water nanofluids. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 84:118–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xian-Ju, W., and L. Xin-Fang. 2009. Influence of pH on nanofluids' viscosity and thermal conductivity. Chinese Physics Letters 26 (5):056601. doi:10.1088/0256-307X/26/5/056601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashawantha, K. M., A. Asif, G. R. Babu, and M. K. Ramis. 2021. Rheological behavior and thermal conductivity of graphite–ethylene glycol nanofluid. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. doi:10.1520/JTE:20190255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashawantha, K. M., and A. V. Vinod. 2020. ANN modeling and experimental investigation on effective thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol: Water nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 140:1–22. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-09756-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, A. D., and D. Toghraie. 2018. Experimental investigation for developing a new model for the dynamic viscosity of silver/ethylene glycol nanofluid at different temperatures and solid volume fractions. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 131 (2):1449–61. doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6696-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, N., and Z. Li. 2017. Experiment and artificial neural network prediction of thermal conductivity and viscosity for alumina-water nanofluids. Materials 10 (5):552–62. doi:10.3390/ma10050552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar