Fluidized dense phase pneumatic conveying: a review

References

• Aked, C., D. Goder, H. Kalman, and A. Zvieli. 1997. Attrition of very fine powders during pneumatic conveying. Powder Handling and Processing 9:345–8.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, C., J. Holden, H. Simons, and L. Schmidt. 1951. Pressure drop in flow of dense coal-air mixtures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 43 (8):1837–40. doi:10.1021/ie50500a044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkassar, Y., V. K. Agarwal, N. Behera, M. G. Jones, and R. K. Pandey. 2019. Transient characteristics of fine powder flows within fluidized dense phase pneumatic conveying systems. Powder Technology 343:629–43. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkassar, Y., V. K. Agarwal, R. K. Pandey, and N. Behera. 2020a. Analysis of dense phase pneumatic conveying of fly ash using CFD including particle size distribution. Particulate Science and Technology 39 (3):322–337. doi:10.1080/02726351.2020.1727592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkassar, Y., V. K. Agarwal, R. K. Pandey, and N. Behera. 2020b. Experimental study and Shannon entropy analysis of pressure fluctuations and flow mode transition in fluidized dense phase pneumatic conveying of fly ash. Particuology 49:169–78. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2019.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkassar, Y., V. K. Agarwal, R. K. Pandey, and N. Behera. 2021. Influence of particle attrition on erosive wear of bends in dilute phase pneumatic conveying. Wear 476:203594. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2020.203594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. B., and R. O. Y. Jackson. 1967. A fluid mechanical description of fluidized beds. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 6 (4):527–39. doi:10.1021/i160024a007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzopardi, B. J., K. Jackson, J. P. Robinson, R. Kaji, M. Byars, and A. Hunt. 2008. Fluctuations in dense phase pneumatic conveying of pulverised coal measured using electrical capacitance tomography. Chemical Engineering Science 63 (9):2548–58. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, W. 1958. Strömungsvorgänge beim Transport von Festteilchen und Flüssigkeitsteilchen. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 30 (3):171–80.
   Google Scholar
• Behera, N., V. K. Agarwal, and M. G. Jones. 2015b. A model of solids friction factor for fluidized dense phase pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 284:403–10. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2015.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, N., V. K. Agarwal, M. Jones, and K. C. Williams. 2013. Modeling and analysis of solids friction factor for fluidized dense phase pneumatic conveying of powders. Particulate Science and Technology 31 (2):136–46. doi:10.1080/02726351.2012.672544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, N., V. K. Agarwal, M. Jones, and K. C. Williams. 2015a. Power spectral density analysis of pressure fluctuation in pneumatic conveying of powders. Particulate Science and Technology 33 (5):510–6. doi:10.1080/02726351.2015.1008079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, N., V. K. Agarwal, M. G. Jones, and K. C. Williams. 2013a. CFD modeling and analysis of dense phase pneumatic conveying of fine particles including particle size distribution. Powder Technology 244:30–7. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, N., V. K. Agarwal, M. G. Jones, and K. C. Williams. 2013b. Modeling and analysis for fluidized dense phase conveying including particle size distribution. Powder Technology 235:386–94. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2012.10.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, N., V. K. Agarwal, M. G. Jones, and K. C. Williams. 2012. Transient parameter analysis of fluidized dense phase conveying. Powder Technology. 217:261–8. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. S. A. 1989. An improved method of predicting pressure drop along pneumatic conveying pipelines. Third International Conference of Bulk Material Storage, Handling and Transportation, 282–288. doi:10.3316/informit.653122315755592.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. S. A. 1990b. Prediction of pressure losses in pneumatic conveying systems. PhD Thesis, Thames Polytechnic, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. S. A. 1990a. Pressure losses caused by bends in pneumatic conveying pipelines, effects of bend geometry and fittings. Powder Handling and Processing 2:315–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. S. A., and A. R. Reed. 1990. An improved method of predicting pressure drop along pneumatic conveying pipelines. Powder Handling and Processing 2:223–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. J, and R. D. Marcus. 1986. Pneumatic conveying calculations. 2nd International Conference on Bulk Materials Storage and Transportation, Institution of Engineers, Australia, Wollongong, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chen B., A. A. Cenna, K. C. Williams, M. G. Jones, and Y. Wang. 2014. Investigation of energy consumption and wear in bypass pneumatic conveying of alumina. lecture notes in mechanical engineering. London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., K. C. Williams, M. G. Jones, and Y. Wang. 2012. Experimental investigation of pressure drop in bypass pneumatic conveying of fly ash. Advanced Materials Research 508:11–5. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.508.11.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., K. C. Williams, I. Jabs, and M. G. Jones. 2014. A qualitative study on the pulsatile flow phenomenon in a dense fly ash pneumatic conveyor. Particuology 17:81–91. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2014.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, B. K., and C. Ratnayaka. 2003. A simple technique for scaling up pneumatic conveying systems. Particulate Science and Technology 21 (3):227–36. doi:10.1080/02726350307480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, B. K., and C. Ratnayaka. 2005. A possible scaling-up technique for dense phase pneumatic conveying. Particulate Science and Technology 23 (2):201–4. doi:10.1080/02726350590922198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhodapkar, S. V., and G. E. Klinzing. 1993. Pressure fluctuations in pneumatic conveying systems. Powder Technology 74 (2):179–95. doi:10.1016/0032-5910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhodapkar, S. 1991. Flow pattern classification in gas-solid suspensions. PhD. Thesis, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. 1979. The impact of powder properties on dense phase flow. Proceeding for the International Conference On Pneumatic Conveying, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fargette, C. 1997. Bench scale tests for the assessment of pneumatic conveying behaviour of powders. Master’s thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Geldart, D. 1973. Types of gas fluidization. Powder Technology 7 (5):285–92. doi:10.1016/0032-5910(73)80037-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goder, D., H. Kalman, G. Ben-Dor, and M. Rivkin. 1994. Experimental investigation of the effect of moisture content and particle size on the pneumatic transportability in a dense phase. Powder Handling and Processing 6:295–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, L. M., and A. L. A. Mesquita. 2014. On the prediction of pickup and saltation velocities in pneumatic conveying. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 31 (1):35–46. doi:10.1590/S0104-66322014000100005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S., V. Agarwal, V. Seshadri, S. Singh, and D. Mills. 2006. Investigations into the factors influencing the fluidized motion conveying of flyash. Proceedings of the CHoPS-05, 2006 Conference, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J., and Y. Tomita. 1995. Analysis of high density gas-solids stratified pipe flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 21 (4):649–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones M., D. Mason, R. Ansell, and C. Fargette. 1998. Development of de-aeration and permeability tests for the assessment of pneumatic conveying capability. Proceedings of 3rd World Congress on Particle Technology, Brighton, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G. 1988. The influence of bulk particulate properties on pneumatic conveying performance. UK: Thames Polytechnic.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., B. Chen, K. C. Williams, A. A. Cenna, and Y. Wang. 2012. High speed visualization of pneumatic conveying of materials in bypass system. Advanced Materials Research 508:6–10. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.508.6.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., and D. Mills. 1990. Product classification for pneumatic conveying. Powder Handling and Processing 2:117–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., and K. C. Williams. 2003. Solids friction factor for fluidized dense phase conveying. Particulate Science and Technology 21 (1):45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., and K. C. Williams. 2008. Predicting the mode of flow in pneumatic conveying systems-A review. Particuology 6 (5):289–300. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2008.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalman, H., and A. Rawat. 2020. Flow regime chart for pneumatic conveying. Chemical Engineering Science 211:115256. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2019.115256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalman, H. 1999. Attrition control by pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 104 (3):214–20. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00097-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, S, and A. J. Chambers. 1993. Scaling pneumatic conveying characteristics for pipeline pressure. Proceedings of International Symposium: Reliable Flow of Particulate Solids II, Oslo, Norway; Powder Science & Technology Research, AS, Norway, 534–44.
   Google Scholar
• Klinzing G. E., R. D. Marcus, F. Rizk, and L. S. Leung. 1997. Pneumatic conveying of solids – a theoretical and practical approach. Springer-Science & Business Media, B.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., D. Harrison, R. M. Nedderman, and J. F. Davidson. 1980. Prediction of the pressure drop for horizontal dense phase pneumatic conveying of particles. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan :225–44.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, A., and D. J. Mason. 2000. Two-layer model for non-suspension gas-solids flow in pipes. Powder Technology 112 (3):263–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma A., K. C. Williams, J. Zhou, and M. G. Jones. 2009. Numerical simulation on sensitivity of pressure drop predicting in pneumatic transport with various settings. 6th International Conference for Conveying and Handling of Particulate Solids, Brisbane, Australia, 102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, N. J. 1993. Characterization of materials for pneumatic conveying. American Ceramic Society Bulletin 72:63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, N. J., and A. R. Reed. 1987. Permeability and air retention characteristics of bulk solid materials in relation to modes of dense phase pneumatic conveying. Bulk Solids Handling 7:415–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mallick, S., and P. Wypych. 2009. Modelling solids friction for dense-phase pneumatic conveying of powders. Particulate Science and Technology 27 (5):444–55. doi:10.1080/02726350903133153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick, S. S., and P. W. Wypych. 2007. Solids friction in fluidised dense-phase flow. Bulk Solids Handling 27:398–406.
   Google Scholar
• Mallick, S. S., and P. W. Wypych. 2009. Minimum transport boundaries for pneumatic conveying of powders. Powder Technology. 194 (3):181–6. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick S. S., P. W. Wypych, and R. Pan. 2011. Minimum transport boundaries for dense-phase pneumatic conveying of powders. The Proceedings of Bulk Solids India, Mumbai.
   Google Scholar
• Manger, E. 1996. Modelling and simulation of gas/solids flow in curvilinear coordinates. Ph.D Thesis Process Technology Telemark University College, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, R. D., and P. C. Lohrmann. 1984. Performance of a bottom discharge blow vessel pneumatically conveying three group a materials. Bulk Solids Handling 4:409–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, D. J., and A. Levy. 2001. A model for non-suspension gas–solids flow of fine powders in pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 27 (3):415–35. doi:10.1016/S0301-9322(00)00033-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason J., S. D. Mills, A. R. Reed, and C. R. Woodcock. 1980. Introduction to pneumatic conveying. In Powder Europa 80. London, England, 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. S., and B. V. Smith. 1972. The erosion of bends by pneumatically conveyed suspensions of abrasive particles. Powder Technology 6 (6):323–35. doi:10.1016/0032-5910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, B. S. 1989. Mechanics of fluids. 6th ed. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• McGlinchey, D., A. Cowell, E. Knight, J. Pugh, A. Mason, and B. Foster. 2007. Bend pressure drop predictions using the Euler-Euler model in dense phase pneumatic conveying. Particulate Science and Technology 25 (6):495–506. doi:10.1080/02726350701492827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D. 1990. Troubleshooting pneumatic conveying: Major systems and their key components. Chemical Engineering 97:101–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D. 2004. An investigation of the unstable region for dense phase conveying in sliding bed flow. Granular Matter 6 (2–3):173–7. doi:10.1007/s10035-004-0162-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D. 2013. Pneumatic conveying design guide. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, D., and J. S. Mason. 1977. Particle concentration effects in bend erosion. Powder Technology 17 (1):37–53. doi:10.1016/0032-5910(77)85041-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills D., J. S. Mason, and R. B. Stacy. 1982. A design study for the pneumatic conveying of a fine particulate material. The Proceedings of Solidex 82: The Solids Handling Conference, Harrogate, C1–C75.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, A., S. S. Mallick, and P. W. Wypych. 2014. An investigation into flow mode transition and pressure fluctuations for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying of fine. Particuology 16:187–95. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2014.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, A., S. S. Mallick, and P. W. Wypych. 2015. An investigation into pressure fluctuations for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic transport of fine powders. Powder Technology 277:163–70. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2015.02.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, A., S. S. Mallick, and P. W. Wypych. 2016. An investigation into the transition of flow mechanism during fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying of fine powders. Particulate Science and Technology 34 (1):23–32. doi:10.1080/02726351.2015.1038672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata K., T. Furukawa, and Y. Yamamoto. 2011. Influence of fluidizing velocity on fluidized powder conveying in a horizontal rectangular channel. ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference: Volume 1, Symposia – Parts A, B, C, and D. Hamamatsu, Japan. July 24–29, pp. 3171–3177. ASME. doi:10.1115/AJK2011-12012.
   Google Scholar
• Ogata, K., T. Furukawa, and Y. Yamamoto. 2012. Fluidized powder conveying in a horizontal rectangular channel using fluidizing air. Advanced Powder Technology 23 (6):761–70. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2011.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata, K., T. Hirose, and S. Yamashita. 2015. Effect of particle properties on fluidized powder conveying in a horizontal channel. Procedia Engineering 102:968–75. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.219.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, R. 1999. Material properties and flow modes in pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 104 (2):157–63. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00044-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, R., B. Mi, and P. W. Wypych. 1994. Pneumatic conveying characteristics of fine and granular bulk solids. KONA Powder and Particle Journal 12 (0):77–85. doi:10.14356/kona.1994014.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, R., and P. W. Wypych. 1992. Scale-up procedures for pneumatic conveying design. Powder Handling and Processing 4:167–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnayaka C., M. Melaaen, and B. Datta. 2005. Pressure drop prediction in dense phase pneumatic conveying using cfd. Fourth International Conference on CFD in the Oil and Gas, Metallurgical and Process Industries SINTEF/NTNU Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnayake, C., B. K. Datta, and M. C. Melaaen. 2007. A unified scaling-up technique for pneumatic conveying systems. Particulate Science and Technology 25 (3):289–302. doi:10.1080/02726350701375949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnayake C., M. C. Melaaen, and B. K. Datta. 2004. An experimental investigation and a CFD modelling of gas-solid flow across a bend in a dense phase pneumatic conveying system. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Bulk Materials Storage, Handling and Transportation. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, 388–393.
   Google Scholar
• Rizk, F. 1976. Pneumatic conveying at optimal operation conditions and a solution of Barth’s Equation. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference of Pneumatic Transport of Solids in Pipes, BHRA Fluid Engineering, volume 4.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, L., N. Vasquez, G. E. Klinzing, and S. Dhodapkar. 2003. Characterization of bulk solids to assess dense phase pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 138 (2–3):93–117. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setia, G., S. Mallick, R. Pan, and P. W. Wypych. 2016. Modeling solids friction factor for fluidized dense. Powder Technology 294:80–92. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setia, G., S. S. Mallick, R. Pan, and P. W. Wypych. 2015. Modeling minimum transport boundary for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying systems. Powder Technology 277:244–51. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2015.02.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setia, G., S. S. Mallick, R. Pan, and P. W. Wypych. 2017. An experimental investigation into modeling solids friction for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic transport of powders. Particuology 30:83–91. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2016.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setia, G., S. S. Mallick, and P. W. Wypych. 2014. On improving solid friction factor modeling for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying systems. Powder Technology 257:88–103. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setia, G., S. S. Mallick, P. W. Wypych, and R. Pan. 2013. Validated scale-up procedure to predict blockage condition for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying systems. Particuology 11 (6):657–63. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2012.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K., S. S. Mallick, and A. Mittal. 2020. A study of energy loss due to particle to particle and wall collisions during fluidized dense-phase pneumatic transport. Powder Technology 362:707–16. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K., S. S. Mallick, and A. Mittal. 2021. An evaluation of testing and modeling procedure for solids friction factor for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying of fine powders. Particulate Science and Technology 39 (1):62–73. doi:10.1080/02726351.2019.1662527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K., S. S. Mallick, A. Mittal, and P. Wypych. 2020. Modelling solids friction for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying. Particulate Science and Technology 38 (4):391–403. doi:10.1080/02726351.2018.1545712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shijo, J. S., and N. Behera. 2017. Transient parameter analysis of pneumatic conveying of fine particles for predicting the change of mode of flow. Particuology 32:82–8. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2016.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmaier, W. 1978. Zur berechnung der horizontalen pneumatischen förderung feinkörniger stoffe. Fördern Und Heb 28:363–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, N., A. Sharma, S. S. Mallick, and P. W. Wypych. 2015. Energy loss at bends in the pneumatic conveying of fly ash. Particuology 21:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., K. C. Williams, M. G. Jones, and B. Chen. 2010. CFD simulation of gas-solid flow in dense phase bypass pneumatic conveying using the Euler–Euler model. Applied Mechanics and Materials 26–28:1190–4. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.26-28.1190.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. 2001. An experimental and computational study of gas/particle multiphase flow in process equipment. Ph.D thesis., Process Technology, Telemark University College, Porsgrunn, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1981. Principles of hydraulic and pneumatic in pipes. Bulk Solids Handling 1:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1982. Correlation analysis in the design of pneumatic conveying transport plant. Bulk Solids Handling 2:231–3.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1991. Friction of the air and air/solid mixture in pneumatic conveying. Bulk Solids Handling 11:99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Williams K., M. Jones, and Y. Yadav. 2007. Pressure fluctuations in dense phase pneumatic conveying. Proceedings for PARTEC-07, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. C., M. G. Jones, I. Jabs, and S. Tan. 2010. Transient phenomena in dense phase pneumatic transport of fly ash powder, in: Bulk Europe 2010, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. C. 1976. A unified physically-based analysis of solid-liquid pipeline flow. Proceedings of hydrotransport, BHRA Cranfield, UK, vol. 4, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, C, and J. Mason. 1987. Bulk solids handling: an introduction to the practice and technology. London: Leonard Hill. ISBN: 0412012510
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P, and P. Arnold. 1989. Meeting the demands of long distance and large throughput pneumatic transportation. 3rd International Conference on Bulk Materials, Storage, Handling and Transportation, 78–83. doi:10.3316/informit.650532332750702.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W., and P. C. Arnold. 1987. Classification and prediction of fly ash handling characteristics for dense-phase and long distance pneumatic transportation. Tiz Fachber. Rohst. Eng 111:753–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. 1995. Latest developments in the pneumatic pipeline transport of bulk solids. 5th International Conference on Bulk Materials Storage, Handling and Transportation: Proceedings, 47–56. doi:10.3316/informit.573130970144139.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P., and P. Arnold. 1986. A standardised-test procedure for pneumatic conveying design. Bulk Solids Handling 5:755–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P., and R. Pan. 1991. Determination of air-only pressure drop in pneumatic conveying systems. Powder Handling and Processing 3:303–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W. 1989. Pneumatic conveying of bulk solids. PhD thesis., University Wollongong, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W. 1999. Prediction and scaling up of steady-state operating condition. Transport of Particulate Materials, An Intensive Short Course. Norway: Porsgruun.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W, and P. C. Arnold. 1984. The use of powder and pipe properties in the prediction of dense phase pneumatic transport behaviour. Proceedings of the Technical Program, Pneumatech 2, Intenational Conference on Pneumatic Conveying Technology, University of Kent, Canterbury, England.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W., and P. C. Arnold. 1985. Standardised-test procedure for pneumatic conveying design. Bulk Solids Handling 5:755–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wypych, P. W., and P. C. Arnold. 1987. On improving scale-up procedures for pneumatic conveying design. Powder Technology 50 (3):281–94. doi:10.1016/0032-5910(87)80074-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W. C. 1978. Correlation for solid friction factor in vertical pneumatic conveying lines. AIChE Journal 24 (3):548–52. doi:10.1002/aic.690240326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., P. W. Wypych, and R. Pan. 1998. Minimum conveying velocity in dilute-phase pneumatic conveying. Powder Handling and Processing 10:255–61.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. x., Y. Zhang, D. McGlinchey, Y. Du, X. Wei, L. a. Ma, and C. s. Guan. 2010. Experimental and numerical study on power consumptions in a double-tube-socket pneumatic conveying system. Powder Technology 204 (2–3):268–72. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar