Numerical simulation of charge generation and saturation for polymer particles by single impact on a metal plate

References

• Bunchatheeravate, P., J. Curtis, Y. Fujii, and S. Matsusaka. 2013. Prediction of particle charging in a dilute pneumatic conveying system. AIChE Journal 59 (7):2308–16. doi:10.1002/aic.14025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceresiat, L., H. Grosshans, and M. V. Papalexandris. 2019. Powder electrification during pneumatic transport: The role of the particle properties and flow rates. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 58:60–9. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, K., Y. Endo, and T. Suzuki. 2018. Experimental study on electrostatic charges and discharges inside storage silo during loading of polypropylene powders. Powder Technology 331:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, F., M. Ray, A. Sowinski, P. Mehrani, and A. Passalacqua. 2021. A review on modeling approaches for the electrostatic charging of particles. Powder Technology 389:104–18. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, F., A. Sowinski, M. Ray, A. Passalacqua, and P. Mehrani. 2018. Charge generation and saturation on polymer particles due to single and repeated particle-metal contacts. Journal of Electrostatics 91:9–15. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2017.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragan, C., M. Bilici, S. Das, and L. Dascalescu. 2009. Triboelectrostatic Phenomena in suction-type dilute-phase pneumatic transport systems. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 16 (3):661–7. doi:10.1109/TDEI.2009.5128503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathollahi, M., M. E. Ahmadi, and S. M. J. Hosseini. 2019. Electrostatic charge generation in pneumatic conveying process: Effect of particle properties. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering Vol 11 (07No.06):76001. doi:10.4236/jpee.2019.76001.
   Google Scholar
• Fotovat, F., X. T. Bi, and J. R. Grace. 2017. Electrostatics in gas-solid fluidized beds: A review. Chemical Engineering Science 173:303–34. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotovat, F., X. T. Bi, and J. R. Grace. 2018. A perspective on electrostatics in gas-solid fluidized beds: Challenges and future research needs. Powder Technology 329:65–75. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.01.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interparticle Forces and External Fields. 2016. Coupled CFD‐DEM Modeling :372–411. doi:10.1002/9781119005315.ch8.
   Google Scholar
• Kaialy, W. 2016. A review of factors affecting electrostatic charging of pharmaceuticals and adhesive mixtures for inhalation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 503 (1–2):262–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.01.076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karner, S. A., and Anne Urbanetz, N. 2011. The impact of electrostatic charge in pharmaceutical powders with specific focus on inhalation-powders. Journal of Aerosol Science 42 (6):428–45. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manafi, M., R. Zarghami, and N. Mostoufi. 2021. Charge transfer and bipolar charging of particles in a bubbling fluidized bed. Particuology 54:109–15. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2020.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui, N., and Y. Murata. 1983. Electrification of polymer particles by impact on a metal plate. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 22 (6R):1057–62. doi:10.1143/JJAP.22.1057.
   Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, S., M. Ghadiri, and H. Masuda. 2000. Electrification of an elastic sphere by repeated impacts on a metal plate. Journal of Physics D 33 (18):2311–9. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/33/18/316.
   Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, S., H. Maruyama, T. Matsuyama, and M. Ghadiri. 2010. Triboelectric charging of powders: A review. Chemical Engineering Science 65 (22):5781–807. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuyama, T., and H. Yamamoto. 1989. Charge transfer between a single polymer particle and metal plate by impact. KONA Powder and Particle Journal 7 (0):15–21. doi:10.14356/kona.1989005.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuyama, T., and H. Yamamoto. 1995a. Charge relaxation process dominates contact charging of a particle in atmospheric conditions. Journal of Physics D 28 (12):2418–23. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/28/12/005.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuyama, T., and H. Yamamoto. 1995b. Electrification of single polymer particles by successive impacts with metal targets. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 31 (6):1441–5. doi:10.1109/28.475738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujumdar, A. S. 2021. Powder technology handbook. Drying Technology 39 (5):710– doi:10.1080/07373937.2020.1757994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndama, A. T., P. Guigon, and K. Saleh. 2011. A reproducible test to characterise the triboelectric charging of powders during their pneumatic transport. Journal of Electrostatics 69 (3):146–56. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2011.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, C., C. Y. Wu, D. England, S. Byard, H. Berchtold, and M. Adams. 2013. Numerical analysis of contact electrification using DEM–CFD. Powder Technology 248:34–43. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Aragón, C., J. Ordieres-Meré, F. Alba-Elías, and A. González-Marcos. 2018. Comparison of cohesive models in EDEM and LIGGGHTS for simulating powder compaction. Materials 11 (11):2341. doi:10.3390/ma11112341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, K., A. Ndama, and P. Guigon. 2011. Relevant parameters involved in tribocharging of powders during dilute phase pneumatic transport. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 89 (12):2582–97. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2011.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt, N., U. Pidoll, D. Markus, U. Klausmeyer, M. V. Papalexandris, and H. Grosshans. 2017. Measurement of electrostatic charging during pneumatic conveying of powders. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 49:461–71. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2017.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sippola, P., J. Kolehmainen, A. Ozel, X. Liu, P. Saarenrinne, and S. Sundaresan. 2018. Experimental and numerical study of wall layer development in a tribocharged fluidized bed. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 849:860–84. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghavivand, M., B. Elchamaa, A. Sowinski, and P. Mehrani. 2019. Study of electrostatic charging of single particles during pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 355:242–50. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.07.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watano, S. 2006. Mechanism and control of electrification in pneumatic conveying of powders. Chemical Engineering Science 61 (7):2271–8. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2005.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, H., and B. Scarlett. 1986. Triboelectric charging of polymer particles by impact. Particle. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 3 (3):117–21. doi:10.1002/ppsc.19860030305.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, J., Y. Zhang, C.-H. Wang, S. Matsusaka, and H. Masuda. 2004. Electrostatics of the granular flow in a pneumatic conveying system. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43 (22):7181–99. doi:10.1021/ie049661l.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, M., N. Ii, A. Shimosaka, Y. Shirakawa, and J. Hidaka. 2006. Experimental and theoretical approaches to charging behavior of polymer particles. Chemical Engineering Science 61 (7):2239–48. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2004.06.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurteri, C. U., M. K. Mazumder, N. Grable, G. Ahuja, S. Trigwell, A. S. Biris, R. Sharma, and R. A. Sims. 2002. Electrostatic effects on dispersion, transport, and deposition of fine pharmaceutical powders: Development of an experimental method for quantitative analysis. Particulate Science and Technology 20 (1):59–79. doi:10.1080/02726350215330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar