PFC–FLAC coupling-based numerical simulation of triaxial test on soybean granular material

References

• Ahmad, R. K., N. D. Dangora, and H. K. Ahmad. 2021a. Effect of moisture content on soybean engineering properties: Comparative study of varieties. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 23 (1):225–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, R. K., N. D. Dangora, and H. K. Ahmad. 2021b. Effect of moisture content on soybean properties: Comparative study of varieties. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 23:225–34.
   Google Scholar
• Babic, L., M. Babic, J. Turan, S. Matic-Kekic, M. Radojcin, S. Mehandzic-Stanisic, I. Pavkovand, and M. Zoranovic. 2011. Physical and stress-strain properties of wheat (Triticum aestivum) kernel. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91 (7):1236–43. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhise, S., A. Kaur, and M. Manikantan. 2014. Moisture dependent physical properties of maize (PMH-1). Acta Alimentaria 43 (3):394–401. doi:10.1556/AAlim.43.2014.3.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boac, J. M., R. P. K. Ambrose, M. E. Casada, R. G. Maghirang, and D. E. Maier. 2014. Applications of discrete element method in modeling of grain postharvest operations. Food Engineering Reviews 6 (4):128–49. doi:10.1007/s12393-014-9090-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breugnot, A., S. Lambert, P. Villard, and P. Gotteland. 2016. A discrete/continuous coupled approach for modeling impacts on cellular geostructures. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 49 (5):1831–48. doi:10.1007/s00603-015-0886-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cil, M. B., and K. A. Alshibli. 2014. 3D analysis of kinematic behavior of granular materials in triaxial testing using DEM with flexible membrane boundary. Acta Geotechnica 9 (2):287–98. doi:10.1007/s11440-013-0273-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee, C. J., and D. N. J. Els. 2009. Calibration of discrete element parameters and the modelling of silo discharge and bucket filling. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 65 (2):198–212. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2008.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundall, P. A., and O. D. L. Strack. 1980. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 30 (3):331–6. doi:10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.331.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, E. 2009. Moisture-dependent physical properties of soybeans. International Agrophysics, 23(3):299–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun, E., and I. Dursun. 2005. Some physical properties of caper seed. Biosystems Engineering 92 (2):237–45. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangin, E., P. Marin, and L. Daudeville. 2007. Approche couplée éléments discrets/finis pour la simulation d’un impact sur ouvrage. European Journal of Computational Mechanics 16 (8):989–1009. doi:10.3166/remn.16.989-1009.
   Google Scholar
• Horabik, J., and M. Molenda. 2016. Parameters and contact models for DEM simulations of agricultural granular materials: A review. Biosystems Engineering 147:206–25. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itasca Consulting Group Inc. 2010. PFC3D-Partical Flow Code 3 dimension. Ver.4.0 User’s Manual. USA: Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. P., P. J. Bosscher, M. E. Plesha, and T. B. Edil. 1999. DEM simulation of granular media—structure interface: Effects of surface roughness and particle shape. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 23 (6):531–47. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199905)23:6<531::AID-NAG980>3.0.CO;2-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, H., H. Chen, J. Yang, and P. Li. 2022. Shaking table tests on a small-scale steel cylindrical silo model in different filling conditions. Structures 37:698–708. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, H., X. Wang, J. Yang, and H. Chen. 2022. Static and seismic pressure of cylindrical steel silo model with granular materials. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 198:107515. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, H., P. Yang, N. Zhang Nan, and Q. Yang. 2019. Direct shear test investigation on mechanical characteristics of soybean heap. Science Technology and Engineering 19 (8):189–93. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, P. J. 1980. Coefficients of friction between cereal grain and various silo wall materials. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 25 (1):75–86. doi:10.1016/0021-8634(80)90049-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Y. Huang, W. Li, H. Yu, S. Ouyang, Y. Guo, H. Gao, Y. Shi, and L. Zhu. 2022. The 3D reconstruction of a digital model for irregular gangue blocks and its application in PFC numerical simulation. Engineering with Computers 38 (S5):4617–27. doi:10.1007/s00366-021-01500-w.
   Google Scholar
• Lv, F., X. Wang, M. Zhang, H. Fu, and J. Yu. 2017. Determination and analysis for parameters of shape, size, physical and mechanical properties of soybean grains. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Discrete Element Methods, 1277–86.
   Google Scholar
• Moya, M., P. J. Aguado, and F. Ayuga. 2013. Mechanical properties of some granular agricultural materials used in silo design. International Agrophysics 27 (2):181–93. doi:10.2478/v10247-012-0084-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. X., L. M. Le, T. C. Nguyen, N. T. H. Nguyen, T.-T. Le, B. T. Pham, V. M. Le, and H.-B. Ly. 2021. Characterization of soybeans and calibration of their DEM input parameters. Particulate Science and Technology 39 (5):530–48. doi:10.1080/02726351.2020.1775739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda, M. 1972. Deformation mechanism of sand in triaxial compression tests. Soils and Foundations 12 (4):45–63. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.12.4_45.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y., C. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Wang, B. Shi, Y. Wang, and S. Deng. 2021. A three-dimensional discrete element model of triaxial tests based on a new flexible membrane boundary. Scientific Reports 11 (1):4753. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84224-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi-Bo, L., W. Chang-Ming, W. Nian-Qin, W. Gang-Cheng, and Y. Kang. 2013. Numerical simulation of loess triaxial shear test by PFC3D. China Journal of Highway and Transport 26:22.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, V. T., F. V. Donzé, and P. Marin. 2011. A discrete element model of concrete under high triaxial loading. Cement and Concrete Composites 33 (9):936–48. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and F. Tonon. 2009. Modeling triaxial test on intact rock using discrete element method with membrane boundary. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 135 (9):1029–37. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., J. Yu, Y. Yu, and Q. Zhang. 2019. Validation of a coupled model of discrete element method with multibody kinematics to simulate the screening process of a swing-bar sieve. Powder Technology 346:193–202. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, S. P., and T. Belytschko. 2004. A bridging domain method for coupling continua with molecular dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 193 (17–20):1645–69. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., H. Fu, and J. Yu. 2015. DEM-based simulation of the corn threshing process. Advanced Powder Technology 26 (5):1400–9. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2015.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar