Feminist methods in a “post-truth” political climate: objectives, strategies, and divisions

References

• Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, Joan, Kate Barry, and Joke Esseveld. 1983. “Objectivity and Truth: Problems in Doing Feminist Research.” Women's Studies International Forum 6(4):423–35. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(83)90035-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, Pertti. 2004. “The Globalization of Qualitative Research.” Pp. 595–608 in Qualitative Research Practice, edited by Giampietro Gobo Clive Seale, Jaber Gubrium, and David Silverman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elijah. 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner-City. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elijah. 2002. “The Ideologically Driven Critique.” American Journal of Sociology 107(6):1533–50. doi: 10.1086/342772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, Anson. 2018. “Sociology and Science: The Making of a Social Scientific Method.” The American Sociologist 49 (1):98–115. doi: 10.1007/s12108-017-9348-y.
   Google Scholar
• Baca Zinn, Maxine and Bonnie Dill. 1996. “Theorizing Difference from Multiracial Feminism.” Feminist Studies 22(2):321–31. doi: 10.2307/3178416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balietti, Stefano, Michael Mäs, and Dirk Helbing. 2015. “On Disciplinary Fragmentation and Scientific Progress.” PloS One 10(3):e0118747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Donnell. 1996. “An Analysis of the Grounded Theory Method and the Concept of Culture.” Qualitative Health Research 6(3):429–41. doi: 10.1177/104973239600600309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Howard. 2000. “Afterward: Racism and the Research Process.” Pp. 247–54 in Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies, edited by France Winddance Twine and Jonathan Warren. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benzer, Matthias. 2011. The Sociology of Theodor Adorno. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bessett, Danielle and Kate Gualtieri. 2002. “Paul Willis and the Scientific Imperative: An Evaluation of Learning to Labour.” Qualitative Sociology 25(1):67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Billo, Emily and Alison Mountz. 2016. “For Institutional Ethnography: Geographical Approaches to Institutions and the Everyday.” Progress in Human Geography 40(2):199–220. doi: 10.1177/0309132515572269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolívar, Antonio and Jesús Domingo. 2006. “Biographical-Narrative Research in Iberoamerica: Areas of Development and the Current Situation.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7(4):Art. 12. Published online: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de
   Google Scholar
• Borochowitz, Dalit Yassour. 2005. “Teaching a Qualitative Research Seminar on Sensitive Issues.” Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice 4(3):347–62. doi: 10.1177/1473325005055608.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brekhus, Wayne. 1998. “A Sociology of the Unmarked: Redirecting Our Focus.” Sociological Theory 16(1):34–51. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16(1):4–32. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70(1):4–28. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Marie. 1998. “Institutional Ethnography and Experience as Data.” Qualitative Sociology 21 (1):55–73. doi: 10.1023/A:1022171325924.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2002. “Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis.” Pp. 675–94 in Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method, edited by Jaber Gubrium and James Holstein. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” Pp. 249–91 in Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2004. “Grounded Theory.” Pp. 496–521 in Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice, edited by Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber and Patricia Leavy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Katherine. 2017. “Capturing Organizations as Actors.” Pp. 31–59 in Approaches to Ethnography, edited by Colin Jerolmack and Shamus Khan. New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, Hae Yeon and Myra Marx Ferree. 2010. “Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities.” Sociological Theory 28(2):129–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. 2012. “Social Inequality, Power, and Politics: Intersectionality and American Pragmatism in Dialogue.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26 (2):442–57.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13(1):3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00988593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberle. 2001. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Color.” Paper Presented at The World Conference Against Racism. Retrieved (www.hsph.harvard.edu/grhf/WoC/feminisms/crenshaw.html).
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43(6):1241–99. doi: 10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Danby, Colin. 2007. “Political Economy and the Closet: Heteronormativity in Feminist Economics.” Feminist Economics 13(2):29–53. doi: 10.1080/13545700601184898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, William. 2016. “The Age of Post-Truth Politics.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Angela. 1981. Women, Race, and Class. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Kathy. 2008. “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful.” Feminist Theory 9(1):67–85. doi: 10.1177/1464700108086364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K. 2001. Interpretive Interactionism, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K. 2002. “Confronting Ethnography's Crisis of Representation.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 31(4):482–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVault, Marjorie. 1999. “Ethnicity and Expertise: Racial-Ethnic Knowledge in Sociological Research.” Pp. 84–103 in Liberating Method: Feminism and Social Research, edited by Marjorie DeVault. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, Marjorie. 2004. “Talking and Listening from Women’s Standpoint: Feminist Strategies for Interviewing and Analysis.” Pp. 227–50 in Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, edited by Sharlene Hesse-Biber and Michelle L. Yaiser. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duneier, Mitchell. 1999. Sidewalk. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Duneier, Mitchell. 2002. “What Kind of Combat Sport is Sociology?” American Journal of Sociology 107 (6):1551–76. doi: 10.1086/342925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edin, Kathryn and Maria Kefalas. 2005. Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Thousand Oaks, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, Robert (ed). 2001. Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, NY: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, Robert, Rachel Fretz, and Linda Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, Franz. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. New York, NY: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Michaele. 2017. “Trump is a Feminist, and Other Cautionary Tales for Our Neoliberal Age.” Theory & Event 20(1):53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, Myra M. 2009. “Inequality, Intersectionality and the Politics of Discourse: Framing Feminist Alliances.” Pp. 84–101 in The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policy Making, edited by Emanuela Lombardo, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, Jerry. 2016. Caught Up: Girls, Surveillance and Wraparound Incarceration. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Alice. 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Philip. 2008. “It’s Just Black, White, or Hispanic’: An Observational Study of Racializing Moves in California’s Segregated Prison Reception Centers.” Law & Society Review 42(4):735–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00357.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Jeff and Ruth Horowitz. 2002. “Introduction: The Methodological Strengths and Dilemmas of Qualitative Sociology.” Qualitative Sociology 25(1):33–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1014300123105.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18(1):59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig, Brian D. 1995. “Grounded Theory as Scientific Method.” Philosophy of Education 28(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martyn. 2004. “Teaching Qualitative Methodology: Craft, Profession or Bricolage.” Pp. 549–60 in Qualitative Research Practice, edited by Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jay Gubrium, and David Silverman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, Stephanie. 2018. “Alt-White: Conceptualizing the ‘Alt-Right’ as a Rhetorical Bridge between White Nationalism and Mainstream Public Discourse.” Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric 8(1/2):6–25.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Kieran. 2017. “Fuck Nuance.” Sociological Theory 35(2):118–27. doi: 10.1177/0735275117709046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, Anne C. 2018. Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, Sharlene, Patricia Leavy, and Michelle Yaiser. 2004. “Feminist Approaches to Research as a Process: Reconceptualizing Epistemology, Methodology, and Method.” Pp. 2–26 in Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, edited by Sharlene Hesse-Biber and Michelle L. Yaiser. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, Kimberly. 2015. Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, Bell. 1981. Ain’t la Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiung, Ping-Chun. 2008. “Teaching Reflexivity in Qualitative Interviewing.” Teaching Sociology 36(3):211–26. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0803600302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiung, Ping-Chun. 2016. “Teaching Qualitative Research as Transgressive Practices.” Qualitative Inquiry 22(2):59–71. doi: 10.1177/1077800415617204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, Aída. 1989. “Relating to Privilege: Seduction and Rejection in the Subordination of White Women and Women of Color.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14(4):833–55. doi: 10.1086/494546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayawardena, Kumari. 2016. Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Jeffrey M. 2020. “Trump Job Approval at Personal Best 49%.” Gallup. Published online: www.news.gallup.com/poll/284156/trump-job-approval-personal-best.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Kaomea, Julie. 2016. “Qualitative Analysis as Ho’oku’iku’l or Bricolage: Teaching Emancipatory Indigenous Research in Postcolonial Hawaii.” Qualitative Inquiry 22(2):99–106. doi: 10.1177/1077800415620222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, Stephen and Robin McTaggart. 2003. “Participatory Action Research.” Pp. 271–330 in Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, Margaret. 2010. Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, Margarethe. 2003. “Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool.” Ethnography 4(3):455–85. doi: 10.1177/146613810343007.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, Michele and Ann Swidler. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37(2):153–71. doi: 10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, Jeffrey. 2016. “The Digital Street: An Ethnographic Study of Networked Street Life in Harlem.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (1):43–58. doi: 10.1177/0002764215601711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Cheu-Jey G. 2012. “Reconsidering Constructivism in Qualitative Research.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 44(4):403–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00720.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorde, Audre. 1983. “There is No Hierarchy of Oppressions.” Bulletin: Homophobia and Education 14(3/4):9.
   Google Scholar
• Lorde, Audre. 1988. A Burst of Light. Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books.
   Google Scholar
• Love, Nancy. 2017. “Back to the Future: Trendy Fascism, the Trump Effect, and the Alt-Right.” New Political Science 39(2):263–8. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2017.1301321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubet, Stephen. 2015. “Review of ‘on the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City’ by Alice Goffman.” The New Rambler Review. https://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, Patricia. 1987. Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Amherst, MA: Center for International Education.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, Amanda. 2017. “Monstrosities in the 2016 Presidential Election and beyond: Centering Nepantla and Intersectional Feminist Activism.” Women’s Studies in Communication 40(2):145–9. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2017.1302260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Mark. 2010. “Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11(3):Art. 8. Published online: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Katherine. 1999. No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Katherine. 2002. “No Shame: The View from the Left Bank.” American Journal of Sociology 107(6):1577–99. doi: 10.1086/342993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, Aihwa. 1995. “Women out of China: Traveling Tales and Theories in Postcolonial Feminism.” Pp. 350–72 in Women Writing Culture, edited by Ruth Behar and Deborah Gordon. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Peter. 1993. “What is Participatory Research? A Theoretical and Methodological Perspective.” Pp. 1–20 in Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada, edited by Peter Park. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.
   Google Scholar
• PolitiFact. 2019. “Donald Trump.” PolitiFact. Retrieved www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, Jessica. 2018. “Digital Feminist Pedagogy and Post-Truth Misogyny.” Teaching in Higher Education 23(5):647–56. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1467162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, Victor. 2015. “On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City.” American Journal of Sociology 121(1):306–8. doi: 10.1086/681075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothe, Dawn L. and Victoria E. Collins. 2019. “Turning Back the Clock? Violence Against Women and the Trump Administration.” Victims & Offenders 14(8):965–78. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2019.1671284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, Michael. 1996. Unlocking the Iron Cage: The Men’s Movement, Gender Politics, and American Culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2017. “Post-Truth?” Social Studies of Science 47(1):3–6. doi: 10.1177/0306312717692076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, Mario. 2009. “How Many Cases Do I Need? On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography 10(1):5–38. doi: 10.1177/1466138108099586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Dorothy. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Toronto, Canada: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012[1999]. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri. 1999. Can the Subaltern Speak? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starks, Helene and Susan Brown Trinidad. 2007. “Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory.” Qualitative Health Research 17(10):1372–80. doi: 10.1177/1049732307307031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin (Eds.). 1997. Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, JooEan, and Yiu-Chung Ko. 2004. “Using Feature Films to Teach Observation in Undergraduate Research Methods.” Teaching Sociology 32(1):109–18. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0403200110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Judith and Matthew Patterson. 2010. “Autonomy and Compliance: How Qualitative Sociologists Respond to Institutional Ethical Oversight.” Qualitative Sociology 33(2):161–83. doi: 10.1007/s11133-010-9148-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Gary and David James. 2006. “Re-Inventing Grounded Theory: Some Questions about Theory, Ground and Discovery.” British Educational Research Journal 32(6):767–95. doi: 10.1080/01411920600989412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Stefan and Iddo Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30(3):167–86. doi: 10.1177/0735275112457914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, Barbara. 2018. “The Vise of Geometry: Distorting Intersectionality at the Scene of Argument.” Meridians 16(1):1–36. doi: 10.2979/meridians.16.1.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twine, France Winddance. 2000. “Racial Ideologies and Racial Methodologies.” Pp. 1–34 in Racing Research, Researching Race: Methodological Dilemmas in Critical Race Studies. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4(2):249–83. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006.
   Google Scholar
• Visweswaran, Kamala. 1997. “Histories of Feminist Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 26(1):591–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.591.
   Google Scholar
• von Unger, Hella. 2016. “Reflexivity beyond Regulations: Teaching Research Ethics and Qualitative Methods in Germany.” Qualitative Inquiry 22(2):87–98. doi: 10.1177/1077800415620220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, Loic. 2002. “Scrutinizing the Street: Poverty, Morality, and the Pitfalls of Urban Ethnography.” American Journal of Sociology 107(6):1468–532. doi: 10.1086/340461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, Candance and Sarah Fenstermaker. 1995. “Doing Difference.” Gender and Society 9(1):8–37. doi: 10.1177/089124395009001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to Labor: How Working-Class Kids Get Working-Class Jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar