Evaluation of Calcein and Photonic Marking for Cultured Delta Smelt

REFERENCES

• Alcobendas, M., F. Lecomte, J. Castanet, F.J. Meunier, P. Maire, and M. Holl. 1991. Mass labeling of elvers with fast balneation in fluorochromes: application to tetracycline labeling of 500 kg of elvers. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 321:43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J.M., and K.R. McKaye. 2004. Immersion marking of juvenile Midas Cichlids with oxytetracycline. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:262–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville-Bridges, B., J.C. Lindberg, and S.I. Doroshov. 2005. Manual for the intensive culture of Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus). University of California, Department of Animal Science, CALFED ERP-02-P31, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, D.W., C.A. Wilson, F. Lorica, and J.M. Dean. 1990. Variability in incorporation of calcein as a fluorescent marker in fish otoliths. Pages 547–549 in N.C. Parker, A.E. Giorgi, R.C. Heidinger, D.B. Jester Jr., E.D. Prince, and G.A. Winans, editors. Fish-marking techniques. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 7, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneau, J.L., R.F. Thurow, and D.L. Scarnecchia. 1995. Capture, marking, and enumeration of juvenile Bull Trout and Cutthroat Trout in small, low-conductivity streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 15:563–568.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R.C., R.C. Heidinger, and C.C. Kohler. 1994. Mass-marking otoliths of larval and juvenile Walleyes by immersion in oxytetracycline, calcein, or calcein blue. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, G., J. Morinaka, J. Lindberg, R. Fujimura, B. Baskerville-Bridges, J. Hobbs, G. Tigan, and L. Ellison. 2012. Pre-screen loss and fish facility efficiency for Delta Smelt at the South Delta's state water project, California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science [online serial] 10(4): article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, M.J., S.R. Chipps, M.A. Bouchard, and D.H. Wahl. 2001. Evaluation of injectable fluorescent tags for marking centrarchid fishes: retention rate and effects on vulnerability to predation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:911–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K.W., M.D. Bowen, R.B. Mayfield, K.P. Zehfuss, J.D. Taplin, and C.H. Hanson. 2009. Quantification of pre-screen loss of juvenile steelhead in Clifton Court Forebay. California Department of Water Resources, Bay-Delta Office, Fishery Improvements Section, Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Elle, F.S., M.K. Koenig, and K.A. Meyer. 2010. Evaluation of calcein as a mass mark for Rainbow Trout raised in outdoor hatchery raceways. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30:1408–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyrer, F., and M.P. Healey. 2003. Fish community structure and environmental correlates in the highly altered southern Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. Environmental Biology of Fishes 66:123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel, V., G. Kindschi, and Y. Zohar. 2002. Noninvasive, mass marking of fish by immersion in calcein: evaluation of fish size and ultrasound exposure on mark endurance. Aquaculture 214:169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldo, L.F., T. Sommer, N. Van Ark, G. Jones, E. Holland, P.B. Moyle, B. Herbold, and P. Smith. 2009. Factors affecting fish entrainment into massive water diversions in a tidal freshwater estuary: can fish losses be managed? North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:1253–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, C.S., H.L. Blankenship, and L.A. Nielsen. 1996. Tagging and marking. Pages 353–383 in B.R. Murphy and D.W. Willis, editors. Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, M.C., S.M. Focher, and C.R. Contor. 2000. High-pressure injection of photonic paint to mark adult Chinook Salmon. North American Journal of Aquaculture 62:319–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettler, W.F. 1984. Marking otoliths by immersion of marine fish larvae in tetracycline. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:370–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M.S., and C.J. Quesada. 2010. Calcein mark retention in Chinook Salmon and steelhead fry in artificial and natural rearing environments. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30:1370–1375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J.A., G. Castillo, G. Tigan, J. Lindberg, N. Ikemiyagi, and G. Ramos. 2012. Tagging the next generation: validation of trans-generational chemical tagging for an endangered fish. Environmental Biology of Fishes 95:463–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeyfield, D.C., T. Kehler, J.W. Fletcher, and J.W. Mohler. 2008. Effect of artificial sunlight on the retention of external calcein marks on Lake Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:1243–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeyfield, D.C., C.S. Ostrowski, J.W. Fletcher, and J.W. Mohler. 2006. Dietary calcein marking of Brook Trout, Atlantic Salmon, Yellow Perch, and Coho Salmon scales. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26:431–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivlev, V.S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. . Translated from the Russian by D. Scott. Murray Printing, Forge Village, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Kano, R.M. 1990. Occurrence and abundance of predator fish in Clifton Court Forebay, California. Interagency Ecological Study Program for the Sacramento–San Joaquin Estuary, Technical Report 24, Sacramento, California.
   Google Scholar
• Leips, J., C.T. Baril, F.H. Rodd, D.N. Reznick, F. Bashey, G.J. Visser, and J. Travis. 2001. The suitability of calcein to mark poeciliid fish and a new method of detection. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:501–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, J.C., G. Tigan, L. Ellison, T. Rettinghouse, M.M. Nagel, and K.M. Fisch. 2013. Aquaculture methods for a genetically managed population of endangered Delta Smelt. North American Journal of Aquaculture 75:186–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logsdon, D.E., and B.J. Pittman. 2012. Evaluation of osmotic induction of calcein treatments for marking juvenile Walleyes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32:796–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, J.R., E. Hanak, W.E. Fleenor, W.A. Bennett, R.E. Howitt, J.F. Mount, and P.B. Moyle. 2010. Comparing futures for the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, D.E. 1963. A revision of the smelt family, Osmeridae. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 191.
   Google Scholar
• Mohler, J.W. 1997. Immersion of larval Atlantic Salmon in calcein solutions to induce a non-lethally detectable mark. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:751–756.
   Google Scholar
• Mohler, J.W. 2003. Producing fluorescent marks on Atlantic Salmon fin rays and scales with calcein via osmotic induction. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:1108–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler, J.W., M.J. Millard, and J.W. Fletcher. 2002. Predation by captive wild Brook Trout on calcein-marked versus nonmarked Atlantic Salmon fry. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:223–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, J.P. , Jr. 1993. Comparison of calcein and tetracycline as chemical markers in Summer Flounder. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122:298–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle, P.B., B. Herbold, D.E. Stevens, and L.W. Miller. 1992. Life history and status of Delta Smelt in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Estuary, California. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negus, M.T., and F.T. Tureson. 2004. Retention and nonlethal external detection of calcein marks in Rainbow Trout and Chinook Salmon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:741–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobriga, M.L., and F. Feyrer. 2007. Shallow-water piscivore–prey dynamics in California's Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science [online serial] 5(2):. article 4.
   Google Scholar
• Radtke, L.D. 1966. Distribution of smelt, juvenile sturgeon, and Starry Flounder in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta with observations on food of sturgeon. California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 136:115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J.H., and J.M. Kilpatrick. 2004. Predator feeding preferences for a benthic stream fish: effects of visible injected marks. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 19:531–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalski, J.R., R.A. Buchanan, and J. Griswold. 2009. Review of marking methods and release–recapture designs for estimating the survival of very small fish: examples from the assessment of salmonid fry survival. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17:391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, B. 1968. Marking and tagging. Pages 78–92 in W.E. Ricker, editor. Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters, 2nd edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sutphin, Z.A. 2008. High pressure injection of a photonic marking agent: mark retention and effects on survival of juvenile Striped Bass, Morone saxatilis, and adult Delta Smelt, Hypomesus transpacificus. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Tracy Fish Facility Study 34, Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Sutphin, Z.A., and J. Morinaka. 2010. Evaluation of calcein immersion for batch-marking fish: survivability and mark retention in Delta Smelt and Sacramento Splittail. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Tracy Technical Bulletin 2010-1, Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, C., R.C. Mager, S.I. Doroshov, and J.J. Cech Jr. 1996. Use of salts, anesthetics, and polymers to minimize handling and transport mortality in Delta Smelt. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:326–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, C., T. Reid, P.S. Young, and J.J. Cech Jr. 2000. Comparative environmental tolerances of threatened Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) and introduced Wakasagi (H. nipponensis) in an altered California estuary. Oecologia 123:384–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetnam, D.A. 1999. Status of Delta Smelt in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Estuary. California Fish and Game 85:22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorrold, S.R., G.P. Jones, M.E. Hellberg, R.S. Burton, S.E. Swearer, J.E. Neigel, S.G. Morgan, and R.R. Warner. 2002. Quantifying larval retention and connectivity in marine populations with artificial and natural markers. Bulletin of Marine Science 70(Supplement 1):291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto, K. 1985. Mass marking of Ayu eggs and larvae by tetracycline-tagging of otoliths. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 51:903–911.
   Google Scholar
• USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2008. Study protocol for a compassionate aquaculture investigational new animal drug (INAD) exemption for calcein (SE-MARK®). USFWS, INAD 10-987, Washington, D.C. . Available: www.fws.gov/fisheries/aadap/calcein.htm. (May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Van Tienhoven, A.M., J.E. Den Hartog, R.A. Reijns, and V.M. Peddemors. 2007. A computer-aided program for pattern-matching of natural marks on the Spotted Raggedtooth Shark Carcharias taurus. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, D.F. H., D.M. Surgenor, J. Soderberg, and E. Delano. 1959. Preparation and properties of 3,6-dihydroxy-2,4-bis-[N,N′-di-(carboxymethyl)-aminomethyl] fluoran: utilization for the ultramicrodetermination of calcium. Analytical Chemistry 31:456–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C.A., D.W. Beckman, and J.M. Dean. 1987. Calcein as a fluorescent marker of otoliths of larval and juvenile fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116:668–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, U. 1973. Vital staining of the hard tissues of Carp, Cyprinus carpio Linné, with tetracycline-HCl, calcein and alizarin red S. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Translation Series 2449. (Translated from Japanese: Bulletin of the Seikai Region Fisheries Research Laboratory (1971) 41:107–116.)
   Google Scholar