Morphological Discrimination of Genetically Distinct Chinook Salmon Populations: an Example from California's Central Valley

REFERENCES

• Anderson, E. C., R. S. Waples, and S. T. Kalinowski. 2008. An improved method for predicting the accuracy of genetic stock identification. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:1475–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beacham, T. D., J. R. Candy, B. McIntosh, C. MacConnachie, A. Tabata, K. Kaukinen, L. Deng, K. M. Miller, R. E. Withler, and N. Varnavskaya. 2005. Estimation of stock composition and individual identification of Sockeye Salmon on a Pacific Rim basis using microsatellite and major histocompatibility complex variation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:1124–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, G. A. 2005. Life history parameters. Pages 119–152 in S. X. Cadrin, K. D. Friedland, and J. R. Waldman, editors. Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship, S., G. Schumer, and B. Cavallo. 2013. Genetic identification of salvaged winter run Chinook Salmon and pilot study for parental based tagging salvage identification methodology. Report to California Department of Water Resources, West Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Borsa P., A. Collet, and J. D. Durand. 2004. Nuclear-DNA markers confirm the presence of two anchovy species in the Mediterranean. Comptes Rendus Biologies 327:1113–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busack, C., C. M. Knudsen, G. Hart, and P. Huffman. 2007. Morphological differences between adult wild and first-generation hatchery upper Yakima River Chinook Salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:1076–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadrin, S. X. 2005. Morphometric landmarks. Pages 153–172 in S. X. Cadrin, K. D. Friedland, and J. R. Waldman, editors. Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Cadrin, S. X., K. D. Friedland, and J. R. Waldman. 2005. Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Campana, S. E. 2005. Otolith elemental composition as a natural marker of fish stocks. Pages 227–246 in S. X. Cadrin, K. D. Friedland, and J. R. Waldman, editors. Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Clemento, A. J., A. Abadía-Cardoso, H. A. Starks, and J. C. Garza. 2011. Discovery and characterization of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Molecular Ecology Resources 11:50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemento, A. J., E. D. Crandall, J. C. Garza, and E. C. Anderson. 2014. Evaluation of a single nucleotide polymorphism baseline for genetic stock identification of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the California Current large marine ecosystem. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 112:112–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courter, I. I., D. B. Child, J. A. Hobbs, T. M. Garrison, J. J. Glessner, and S. Duery. 2013. Resident Rainbow Trout produce anadromous offspring in a large interior watershed. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 70:701–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisci, C., B. Ghattas, and G. Perera. 2012. A review of supervised machine learning algorithms and their applications to ecological data. Ecological Modelling 240:113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, D. R., T. C. Edwards Jr., K. H. Beard, A. Cutler, K. T. Hess, J. Gibson, and J. J. Lawler. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinan, T. J., P. McGinnity, J. P. Coughlan, T. F. Cross, and S. S. C. Harrison. 2012. Morphological variability of Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar and Brown Trout Salmo trutta in different river environments. Ecology of Freshwater Fishes 21:420–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T., and W. Rasband. 2012. ImageJ user guide: IJ 1.46r revised edition. Available: http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/docs/guide/index.html. (May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, F. W. 1992. Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, growth and occurrence in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system. California Department Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, draft office report, Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Guisande, C., A. Manjarrés-Hernández, P. Pelayo-Villamil, C. Granado-Lorencio, I. Riveiro, A. Acuña, E. Prieto-Piraquive, E. Janeiro, J. M. Matías, C. Patti, B. Patti, S. Mazzola, S. Jiménez, V. Duque, and F. Salmerón. 2010. IPez: an expert system for the taxonomic identification of fishes based on machine learning techniques. Fisheries Research 102:240–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. N. 2011. Length-at-date criteria to classify juvenile Chinook Salmon in the California Central Valley: development and implementation history. Interagency Ecological Program Newsletter 24(3). Available: http://www.water.ca.gov/iep/newsletters/2011/IEPNewsletterFinalSummer2011.pdf.(May2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hedgecock, D., M. A. Banks, V. K. Rashbrook, C. A. Dean, and S. M. Blankenship, S. M. 2001. Applications of population genetics to conservation of Chinook Salmon diversity in the Central Valley. Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids. California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 179:45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P. A., C. H. Graham, L. L. Master, and D. L. Albert. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29:773–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, E. E. 2001. Estimating risks in declining populations with poor data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:5072–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kyperountas, M., A. Tefas, and I Pitas. 2007. Weighted piecewise LDA for solving the small sample size problem in face verification. IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Transactions on Neural Networks 18:506–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschiner, M., R. Hanel, and W. Salzburger. 2010. Phylogeography and speciation processes in marine fishes and fishes from large freshwater lakes. Pages 1–29 in D. S. Rutgers, editor. Phylogeography concepts, intraspecific patterns and speciation processes. Nova Science Publishers, New York.
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., S. Cushman, and S. Stafford. 2000. Multivariate statistics for wildlife and ecology research. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, J. M., W. Jetz, and D. J. Rogers. 2004. The effects of species’ range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artifact? Journal of Applied Ecology 4:811–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, J. E., and W. R. Merz. 2004. Morphological features used to identify Chinook Salmon sex during fish passage. Southwestern Naturalist 49:197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. A., A. Gray, and J. Merz. 2010. Quantifying the contribution of juvenile migratory phenotypes in a population of Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Marine Ecology Progress Series 408:227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, G. B., D. J. Teel, F. M. Utter, and G. A. Winans. 1985. A genetic method of stock identification in mixed populations of Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. Marine Fisheries Review 47:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California, revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkley.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C. E., J. J. Hoover, S. G. George, and K. J. Kilgore. 2007. Morphometric variation among river sturgeons of the middle and lower Mississippi River. Journal of Applied Technology 23:313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J., Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grand, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of Chinook Salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-35.
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2009. Biological and conference opinion on the long-term operations of the Central Valley project and state water project. NMFS, Long Beach, California. Available: http://www.swr.noaa.gov/ocap/NMFS_Biological_and_Conference_Opinion_on_the_Long-Term_Operations_of_the_CVP_and_SWP.pdf. (March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• North, J. A., R. A. Farr, and P. Vescei. 2002. A comparison of meristic and morphometric characters of Green Sturgeon, Acipencer medirostris. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 18:234–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangle, K. L., S. A. Ludsin, and B. J. Fryer. 2010. Otolith microchemistry as a stock identification tool for freshwater fishes: testing its limits in Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 67:1475–1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available: http://www.R-project.org./(May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Seeb, L. W., A. Antonovich, M. A. Banks, T. D. Beacham, M. R. Bellinger, S. M. Blankenship, M. R. Campbell, N. A. Decovich, J. C. Garza, C. M. Guthrie III, T. A. Lundrigan, P. Moran, S. R. Narum, J. J. Stephenson, K. J. Supernault, D. J. Teel, W. D. Templin, J. K. Wenburg, S. F. Young, and C. T. Smith. 2007. Development of a standardized DNA database for Chinook Salmon. Fisheries 32:540–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, A. 2003. Morphometric variation among sardine (Sardina pilchardus) populations from the northeastern Atlantic and the western Mediterranean. Journal du Conseil Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 60:1352–1360.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, D. R. B., and A. T. Peterson. 2002. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling 148:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, R. E., and C. E. Bond. 1990. Taxonomic methods: morphology. Pages 109–140 in C. B. Schreck and P. B. Moyle, editors. Methods for fish biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Teletchea, F. 2009. Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 19:265–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffan, K. F., and W. P. Connor. 2011. Distinguishing between natural and hatchery Snake River fall Chinook Salmon subyearlings in the field using body morphology. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140:21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffan, K. F., D. W. Rondorf, R. D. Garland, and P. A. Verhey. 2000. Identification of juvenile fall versus spring Chinook Salmon migrating through the lower Snake River based on body morphology. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:1389–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traina, A., G. Basilone, F. Saborido-Rey, R. Ferreri, E. Quinci, T. Masullo, S. Aronica, and S. Mazzola. 2011. Assessing population structure of European Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in the Central Mediterranean by means of traditional morphometry. Advances in Oceanography and Limnology 2:141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edition. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Westley, P. A., S. M. Carlson, and T. P. Quinn. 2008. Among-population variation in adipose fin size parallels the expression of other secondary sexual characteristics in Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Environmental Biology of Fishes 81:439–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. G. 2006. Central Valley salmon–a perspective on Chinook and steelhead in the Central Valley of California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 2(4). Available: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/21v9×1t7. (May2014).
   Google Scholar
• Winans, G. A. 1984. Multivariate morphometric variability in Pacific salmon: technical demonstration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41:1150–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winans, G. A., S. Pollard, and D. R. Kuligowski. 2003. Two reproductive life history types of kokanee, Onchorynchus nerka, exhibit multivariate morphometric and protein genetic differentiation. Environmental Biology of Fishes 77:87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshiyama, R. M., P. B. Moyle, E. R. Gerstung, and F. W. Fisher. 2000. Chinook Salmon in the California Central Valley: an assessment. Fisheries25(2):6–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar