232
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MANAGEMENT BRIEF

Retention and Stress Effects of Visible Implant Tags When Marking Western Silvery Minnow and Its Application to Other Cyprinids (Family Cyprinidae)

, &
Pages 1070-1076 | Received 16 Apr 2015, Accepted 29 Jul 2015, Published online: 07 Oct 2015

REFERENCES

  • Aparicio, E., and A. de Sostoa. 1999. Field evaluation of visible implant tag retention by Barbus haasi. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 15:199–200.
  • Astorga, N., J. N. Afonso, M. J. Zamorano, D. Montero, V. Oliva, H. Fernandez, and M. S. Gilthead Seabream (Sparus auratus L.); effects on growth, mortality, handling time and tag loss. Aquaculture Research 36:733–738.
  • Bailey, R. E., J. R. Irvine, F. C. Dalziel, and T. C. Nelson. 1998. Evaluations of visible implant fluorescent tags for marking Coho Salmon smolts. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:191–196.
  • Bangs, B. L., M. R. Falcy, P. D. Scheerer, and S. Clements. 2013. Comparison of three methods for marking a small floodplain minnow. Animal Biotelemetry [online serial] 1:18.
  • Barton, B. A. 2002. Stress in fishes: a diversity of responses with particular reference to changes in circulating corticosteroids. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:517–525.
  • Barton, B. A., and G. K. Iwama. 1991. Physiological changes in fish from stress in aquaculture with emphasis on the response and effects of corticosteroids. Annual Review of Fish Diseases 1:3–26.
  • Barton, B. A., R. E. Peter, and C. R. Paulencu. 1980. Plasma cortisol levels of fingerling Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) at rest, and subjected to handling, confinement, transport, and stocking. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:805–811.
  • Barton, B. A., C. B. Schreck, and L. A. Sigismondi. 1986. Multiple acute disturbances evoke cumulative physiological stress responses in juvenile Chinook Salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115:245–251.
  • Basavaraju, Y., B. S. R. Devi, G. Mukhatyakka, L. P. Reddy, G. C. Mair, E. E. Roderick, and D. J. Penman. 1998. Evaluation of marking and tagging methods for genetic studies in carp. Journal of Biosciences 23:585–593.
  • Björnsson, B., H. Karlsson, V. Thorsteinsson, and J. Solmundsson. 2011. Should all fish in mark–recapture experiments be double-tagged? Lessons learned from tagging coastal cod (Gadus morhua). ICES Journal of Marine Science 68:603–610.
  • Blankenship, H. L., and J. M. Tipping. 1993. Evaluation of visible implant and sequentially coded wire tags in sea-run Cutthroat Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13:391–394.
  • Bolland, J. D., I. G. Cowx, and M. C. Lucas. 2009. Evaluation of VIE and PIT tagging methods for juvenile cyprinid fishes. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 25:381–386.
  • Bryan, R. D., and J. J. Ney. 1994. Visible implant tag retention by and effects on condition of a stream population of Brook Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:216–219.
  • Campana, S. E., G. A. Chouinard, J. M. Hanson, A. Frechet, and J. Brattey. 2000. Otolith elemental fingerprints as biological tracers of fish stocks. Fisheries Research 46:343–357.
  • Cho, S. J., C. A. Caldwell, and W. R. Gould. 2009. Physiological stress responses of Rio Grande Silvery Minnow: effects of individual and multiple physical stressors of handling, confinement, and transport. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:1698–1706.
  • Close, T. L., and T. S. Jones. 2002. Detection of visible implant elastomer in fingerling and yearling Rainbow Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:961–964.
  • Clugston, J. P. 1996. Retention of T-bar anchor tags and passive integrated transponder tags by Gulf sturgeons. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:682–685.
  • Counihan, T. D., and C. N. Frost. 1999. Influence of externally attached transmitters on the swimming performance of juvenile White Sturgeon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:965–970.
  • Davis, J. L., M. E. Barnes, J. L. Kientz, and A. G. Galinat. 2014. Effects of fish length and anatomical placement on retention of visible implant alpha tags in hatchery-reared Rainbow Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 34:932–937.
  • Halls, A. S., and M. E. Azim. 1998. The utility of visible implant (VI) tags for marking tropical river fish. Fisheries Management and Ecology 5:71–80.
  • Hammer, S. A., and L. H. Blankenship. 2001. Cost comparison of marks, tags, and mark-with-tag combinations used in salmonid research. North American Journal of Aquaculture 63:171–178.
  • Hansen, L. P. 1988. Effects of Carlin tagging and fin clipping on survival of Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar L.) released as smolts. Aquaculture 70:391–394.
  • Haw, F., P. K. Bergman, R. D. Fralick, R. M. Buckley, and H. L. Blankenship. 1990. Visible implanted fish tag. Pages 1–15 in N. C. Parker, A. E. Giorgi, R. C. Heidinger, D. B. Jester Jr., E. D. Prince, and G. A. Winans, editors. Fish marking techniques. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 7, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Hilborn, R. 1990. Determination of fish movement patterns from tag recoveries using maximum likelihood estimators. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:635–643.
  • Hoolihan, J. P., J. Luo, F. J. Abascal, S. E. Campana, G. De Metrio, H. Dewar, M. L. Domeier, L. A. Howey, M. E. Lutcavage, and M. K. Musyl. 2011. Evaluating post-release behaviour modification in large pelagic fish deployed with pop-up satellite archival tags. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68:880–889.
  • Imbert, H., L. Beaulaton, C. Rigaud, and P. Elie. 2007. Evaluation of visible implant elastomer as a method for tagging small European eels. Journal of Fish Biology 71:1546–1554.
  • Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Diaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, and J. S. Nelson. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33:372–407.
  • Jepsen, N., L. E. Davis, C. B. Schreck, and B. Siddens. 2001. The physiological response of chinook salmon smolts to two methods of radio-tagging. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:495–500.
  • Kincaid, H. L., and G. T. Calkins. 1992. Retention of visible implant tags in Lake Trout and Atlantic Salmon. Progressive Fish-Culturist 54:163–170.
  • Leblanc, C. A., and D. L. Noakes. 2012. Visible implant elastomer (VIE) tags for marking small Rainbow Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32:716–719.
  • Mazeaud, M. M., F. Mazeaud, and E. M. Donaldson. 1977. Primary and secondary effects of stress in fish: some new data with a general review. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106:201–212.
  • McCleave, J. D., and K. A. Stred. 1975. Effect of dummy telemetry transmitters on stamina of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 32:559–563.
  • McMahon, T. E., S. R. Dalbey, S. C. Ireland, J. P. Magee, and P. A. Byorth. 1996. Field evaluation of visible implant tag retention by Brook Trout, Cutthroat Trout, Rainbow Trout, and Arctic Grayling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:921–925.
  • Morgan, C. E., and M. A. Farooqi. 1995. A preliminary investigation of elastomer visible implant (EVI) tag retention rates and the effect of tagging on the growth and survival of Barbel (Barbus barbus L.). National River Authority North West, NRA/NW/FTR/95/1, Warrington, UK.
  • Murphy, B. R., L. A. Nielsen, and B. J. Turner. 1983. Use of genetic tags to evaluate stocking success for reservoir Walleyes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 112:457–463.
  • Niva, T. 1995. Retention of visible implant tags by juvenile Brown Trout. Journal of Fish Biology 46:997–1002.
  • Phillips, C. T., and J. N. Fries. 2009. An evaluation of visible implant elastomer for marking the federally listed Fountain Darter and the San Marcos salamander. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:529–532.
  • Pine, W. E., K. H. Pollock, J. E. Hightower, T. J. Kwak, and J. A. Rice. 2003. A review of tagging methods for estimating fish population size and components of mortality. Fisheries 28(10):10–23.
  • Pottinger, T. 2010. A multivariate comparison of the stress response in three salmonid and three cyprinid species: evidence for inter-family differences. Journal of Fish Biology 76:601–621.
  • Reeves, K. S., and D. L. Buckmeier. 2009. Mortality, predation, and tag visibility of fish marked with visible implant elastomer tags. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:323–329.
  • Rehnberg, B. G., R. J. F. Smith, and B. D. Sloley. 1987. The reaction of pearl dace (Pisces, Cyprinidae) to alarm substance: time-course of behavior, brain amines, and stress physiology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65:2916–2921.
  • Ritz, C., and J. C. Streibig. 2005. Bioassay analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software 12(5):1–22.
  • Schreck, C. B., W. Contreras-Sanchez, and M. S. Fitzpatrick. 2001. Effects of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny. Aquaculture 197:3–24.
  • Ward, D. L., W. R. Persons, K. L. Young, D. M. Stone, D. R. Vanhaverbeke, and W. K. Knight. 2015. A laboratory evaluation of tagging-related mortality and tag loss in juvenile Humpback Chub. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 35:135–140.
  • Wenburg, J. K., and G. W. George. 1995. Placement of visible implant tags in the anal fin of wild Coastal Cutthroat Trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Managament 15:874–877.
  • Wendelaar Bonga, S. E. 1997. The stress response in fish. Physiological reviews 77:591–625.
  • Williams, H. H., K. MacKenzie, and A. M. McCarthy. 1992. Parasites as biological indicators of the population biology, migrations, diet, and phylogenetics of fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 2:144–176.
  • Zerrenner, A., D. C. Josephson, and C. C. Krueger. 1997. Growth, mortality, and mark retention of hatchery Brook Trout marked with visible implant tags, jaw tags, and adipose fin clips. Progressive Fish-Culturist 59:241–245.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.