Influence of Introduction History on Genetic Variation in Introduced Populations: A Case Study of Oregon Chub

References

• Allendorf, F. W., and G. K. Luikart. 2007. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ardren, W. R., L. Amata, J. Whelan, and P. W. DeHaan. 2007. Characterization of 16 highly variable tetranucleotide microsatellite loci for Oregon Chub (Oregonichthys crameri) and cross amplification in Umpqua Chub (O. kalawatseti). Molecular Ecology Notes 7:808–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, T. W. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1175–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangs, B. L., P. D. Scheerer, and S. Clements. 2013. Oregon Chub investigations. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C. E. 1974. Endangered plants and animals of Oregon: I. Fishes. Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, D. D., and J. J. Long. 1984. Status of the Oregon Chub, Hybopsis crameri. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Western Fish and Wildlife Agencies 64:483–486.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and mulitmodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edition. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cornuet, J. M., and G. Luikart. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHaan, P. W., P. D. Scheerer, R. Rhew, and W. R. Ardren. 2012. Analyses of genetic variation in Oregon Chub, a threatened floodplain minnow in a highly altered environment. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:533–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drauch, A. M., B. E. Fisher, E. K. Latch, J. A. Fike, and O. E. Rhodes Jr. 2008. Evaluation of a remnant Lake Sturgeon population’s utility as a source for reintroductions in the Ohio River system. Conservation Genetics 9:1195–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drauch, A. M., and O. E. Rhodes Jr. 2007. Genetic evaluation of the Lake Sturgeon reintroduction program in the Mississippi and Missouri rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:434–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, A. J., S. Parmenter, and B. P. May. 2013. Conservation of the Owens Pupfish: genetic effects of multiple translocations and extirpations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:1430–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons, N. N., S. W. Buskirk, and M. H. Smith. 1997. Genetic changes in reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:863–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham, R. 2015. Gentic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Molecular Ecology 24:2610–2618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L., B. R. Kuhajda, J. D. Williams, M. A. Cantrell, P. L. Rakes, and J. R. Shute. 2009. Guidelines for propagation and translocation for freshwater fish conservation. Fisheries 34:529–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Available: http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm. (March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, B., J. M. Scott, J. W. Carpenter, and C. Reed. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245:477–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groombridge, J. J., C. Raisin, R. Bristol, and D. S. Richardson. 2012. Genetic consequences of reintroductions and insights from population history. Pages 396–440 in J. G. Ewen, D. P. Armstrong, K. A. Parker, and P. J. Seddon, editors. Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselman, D. J., R. A. Hinrichsen, B. A. Shields, and C. C. Ebbesmeyer. 2012. The rapid establishment, dispersal, and increased abundance of invasive American Shad in the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 37:103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. F., J. L. Rachlow, O. E. Rhodes Jr., C. L. Williams, and L. P. Waits. 2007. Reintroduction and genetic structure: Rocky Mountain elk in Yellowstone and the western states. Journal of Mammalogy 88:129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, D. D., L. M. Miller, C. J. Chizinski, and B. Vondracek. 2011. Mixed-source reintroductions lead to outbreeding depression in second-generation descendents of a native North American fish. Molecular Ecology 20:4246–4258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, D. D., L. M. Miller, and B. Vondracek. 2010. Patterns of ancestry and genetic diversity in reintroduced populations of the Slimy Sculpin: implications for conservation. Conservation Genetics 11:2379–2391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN–SSC (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources–Species Survival Commission). 2013. Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations, version 1.0. IUCN–SSC, Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, M., and N. A. Rosenberg. 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarne, P., and P. J. L. Lagoda. 1996. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:424–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, S. T. 2005. HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Molecular Ecology Notes 5:187–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesica, P., and F. W. Allendorf. 1999. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restoration Ecology 7:42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. O., and D. Zaykin. 2001. Genetic data analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Available: http://www.eeb.uconn.edu/people/plewis/software.php. (March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, H. R., and J. S. Campbell. 1969. World distribution of Brook Trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26:1699–1725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markle, D. F., T. N. Pearsons, and D. T. Bills. 1991. Natural history of Oregonichthys (Pisces: Cyprinidae) with a description of a new species from the Umpqua River of Oregon, USA. Copeia 1991:277–293.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, E. K., and K. A. Naish. 2007. What is the fitness outcome of crossing unrelated fish populations? A meta-analysis and an evaluation of future research directions. Conservation Genetics 8:397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowall, R. M. 1994. The origins of New Zealand’s Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Marine Fisheries Review 56:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Meffe, G. K. 1995. Genetic and ecological guidelines for species reintroduction programs: application to Great Lakes fishes. Journal of Great Lakes Research 21:3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. A., N. J. Nelson, H. G. Smith, and J. A. Moore. 2009. How do reproductive skew and founder group size affect genetic diversity in reintroduced populations? Molecular Ecology 18:3792–3802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock, K. E., E. K. Latch, and O. E. Rhodes Jr. 2004. Assessing losses of genetic diversity due to translocation: long-term case histories in Merriam’s turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami). Conservation Genetics 5:631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowry, R. A., T. M. Schneider, E. K. Latch, M. E. Gomper, J. Beringer, and L. S. Eggert. 2015. Genetics and the successful reintroduction of the Missouri River otter. Animal Conservation 18:196–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei, M., T. Maruyama, and R. Chakraborty. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODFW (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife). 1992. Conservation agreement for the Oregon Chub in the Willamette Valley. ODFW, Corvallis.
   Google Scholar
• Page, K. S., K. T. Scribner, K. R. Bennett, and L. M. Garzel. 2003. Genetic assessment of strain-specific sources of Lake Trout recruitment in the Great Lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:877–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsons, T. N. 1989. Ecology and decline of a rare western minnow: the Oregon Chub (Oregonichthys crameri). Master’s thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis.
   Google Scholar
• Piry, S., G. Luikart, and J. M. Cornuet. 1999. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity 90:502–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett, E. E., T. V. Kristensen, C. M. Wilton, S. B. Lyda, K. V. Noyce, P. M. Holahan, D. M. Leslie Jr., J. Beringer, J. L. Belant, D. White Jr., and L. S. Eggert. 2014. Influence of drift and admixture on population structure of American black bears Ursus americanus in the central interior highlands, USA, 50 years after translocation. Molecular Ecology 23:2414–2427.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version-1.2) population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86:248–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. H., and R. Frankham. 2003. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conservation Biology 17:230–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rius, M., and J. A. Darling. 2014. How important is intraspecific genetic admixture to the success of colonising populations? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 29:233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. A. 2004. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes 4:137–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzburger, W., H. Niederstätter, A. Brandstätter, B. Berger, W. Parson, J. Snoeks, and C. Sturmbauer. 2006. Colour-assortative mating among populations of Tropheus moorii, a cichlid fish from Lake Tanganyika, East Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:257–266.
   Google Scholar
• Sarre, S. D., N. Aitken, A. T. Adamack, A. J. MacDonald, B. Gruber, and P. Cowan. 2014. Creating new evolutionary pathways through bioinvasion: the population genetics of brushtail possums in New Zealand. Molecular Ecology 23:3419–3433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerer, P. D. 2002. Implications of floodplain isolation and connectivity on the conservation of an endangered minnow, Oregon Chub, in the Willamette River, Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131:1070–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerer, P. D. 2007. Improved status of the endangered Oregon Chub in the Willamette River, Oregon. Pages 91–102 in M. J. Brouder and J. A. Scheurer, editors. Status, distribution, and conservation of native freshwater fishes of western North America. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 53, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerer, P. D., S. E. Jacobs, and M. Terwilliger. 2005. Monitoring of Hospital Pond: Willamette Basin Oregon Chub investigations, monitoring, and management. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, P. J., D. P. Armstrong, and R. F. Maloney. 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology 21:303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, J. R., P. L. Rakes, and P. W. Shute. 2005. Reintroduction of four imperiled fishes in Abrams Creek, Tennessee. Southeastern Naturalist 4:93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, C. L., D. G. Whittaker, D. Gillis, L. L. Cox, and O. E. Rhodes Jr. 2005. Genetic consequences of reintroductions: an example from Oregon pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana). Journal of Wildlife Management 69:1463–1474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockwell, C. A., and P. L. Leberg. 2002. Ecological genetics and the translocation of native fishes: emerging experimental approaches. Western North American Naturalist 62:32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallmon, D. A., G. Luikart, and R. S. Waples. 2004. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:489–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1993. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of endangered status for the Oregon Chub. Federal Register 58:199(18 October 1993):53800–53804.
   Google Scholar
• USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2015. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; removing the Oregon Chub from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife. Federal Register 80:33(19 February 2015):9126–9150.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, R. W. 2006. Diversifying trout fishing opportunity in Wyoming: history, challenges, and guidelines. Fisheries 31:548–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. L., T. L. Serfass, R. Cogan, and O. E. Rhodes Jr. 2002. Microsatellite variation in the reintroduced Pennsylvania elk herd. Molecular Ecology 11:1299–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. E., D. W. Sada, and C. D. Williams. 1988. American Fisheries Society guidelines for introductions of threatened and endangered fishes. Fisheries 13:5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. C., M. Lavender, and J. Black. 2007. Genetic assessment of Walleye (Sander vitreus) restoration efforts and options in Nipigon Bay and Black Bay, Lake Superior. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33:133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisely, S. M., R. M. Santymire, T. M. Livieri, S. A. Mueting, and J. Howard. 2008. Genotypic and phenotypic consequences of reintroduction history in the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). Conservation Genetics 9:389–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, C. M., B. Griffith, C. Reed, and S. A. Temple. 1996. Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conservation Biology 10:1142–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar