Pars Pro Toto Observation: Historical Anthropology in the Textual Field of Rasulid Yemen

References

• Boas, F. 1896. “The Limitations of the Comparative Method in Anthropology.” Science 4 (103): 901–908. doi: 10.1126/science.4.103.901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breisach, E. 1994. Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, & Modern. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breisach, E. 2003. On the Future of History: The Postmodernist Challenge and its Aftermath. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, H. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: G. Bell.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., and G. Marcus. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J. 1982. “Dialectical Systems, History and Anthropology: Units of Study and Questions of Theory.” Journal of South African Studies 8 (2): 143–172. doi: 10.1080/03057078208708040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J. 2010. “The End of Anthropology, Again: On the Future of an In/Discipline.” American Anthropologist 112 (4): 524–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F. 1884. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats [The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State]. Hottingen–Zurich: Schweizerischen Volksbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. J. 2000. In Defense of History. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1950. “Social Anthropology: Past and Present, the Marett Lecture, 1950.” Man 50: 118–124. doi: 10.2307/2794464
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E. 1973. “Post-Traditional Forms of Islam: The Turf and Trade, and Votes and Peanuts.” Daedalus 102 (1): 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Goldziher, I. 1971. Muslim Studies (Muhammedanische Studien). Vol. 2, edited by S. M. Stern. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. New York: Crowell.
   Google Scholar
• Haviland, W. 2002. Cultural Anthropology. 10th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• al-Ḥibshī, ’Abd Allāh. 1977. Maṣadir al-fikr al-‘Arabī al-islāmī fī al-Yaman. Sanaa: Markaz al-Dirāsāt al-Yamanīya.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., and S. Hutson. 2003. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D., ed. 1974. Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Ibn Sīda. 1965. al-Mukhaṣṣaṣ. 17 vols. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Tijārī li-al-Ṭibā‘a wa-al-Tawāzi‘ wa-al-Nashr.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education, edited by Günter Zöller and Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maitland, F. W. 1936. Maitland: Selected Essays, edited by H. D. Hazeltine, G. Lapsley, and P. H. Winfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• al-Malik al-Ashraf ’Umar. 1985. Turfat al-aṣḥāb fī ma‘rifat al-ansāb. Sanaa: Dār al-Kalima.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. H. 1877. Ancient Society. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, P. 1949. “What is Anthropology?” The Kenyon Review 11 (3): 523–526.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, P. [1933] 1965. The Method and Theory of Ethnology: An Essay in Criticism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. 2003. Islamic Historiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. 1939. L'Arabo Parlato a San'a’. Rome: Istituto per l'Oriente.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. 1989. “Representing the Colonized: Anthropology's Interlocutors.” Critical Inquiry 15: 205–225. doi: 10.1086/448481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. 1994. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saliba, G. 1985. “A Medieval Note on the Himyarite Dialect.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 105: 717–719.
   Google Scholar
• Salim, Sema'an I. 1996. “[Review of] Al-Ashraf, Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science.” Speculum 71: 114–115. doi: 10.2307/2865204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, W. 2003. “Mamlūk Metrology and the Numismatic Evidence.” Al-Masāq 15 (1): 59–75. doi: 10.1080/0950311032000057130
   Google Scholar
• Serjeant, R. B. 1974. “The Cultivation of Cereals in Medieval Yemen.” Arabian Studies 1: 25–74.
   Google Scholar
• Shankman, P. 2009. The Trashing of Margaret Mead: Anatomy of an Anthropological Controversy. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. R. 1978. The Ayyūbids and Early Rasūlids in the Yemen (567–694/1173–1295). London: Gibb Memorial Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Vallet, E. 2010. L'Arabie marchande: état et commerce sous les sultans rasūlides du Yémen (626–858/1229–1454). Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Varisco, D. M. 1983. “Sayl and Ghayl: The Ecology of Water Allocation in Yemen.” Human Ecology 11: 365–383. doi: 10.1007/BF00892245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varisco, D. M. 1994. Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science: The Almanac of a Yemeni Sultan. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varisco, D. M. 1997. Medieval Folk Astronomy and Agriculture in Arabia and the Yemen. London: Variorum.
   Google Scholar
• Varisco, D. M. 2002. “Agriculture in Rasulid Zabid.” Journal of Semitic Studies, Supplement 14. In Studies on Arabia in Honour of Professor G. Rex Smith, edited by J. F. Healey and V. Porter, 323–351. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varisco, D. M. 2004. “Reading Against Culture in Edward Said's Culture and Imperialism.” Culture, Theory and Critique 45 (2): 93–112. doi: 10.1080/1473578042000283817
   Google Scholar
• Varisco, D. M. 2005. Islam Obscured: The Rhetoric of Anthropological Interpretation. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Varisco, D. M., and G. R. Smith. 1998. The Manuscript of al-Malik al-Afḍal. Warminster, England: Gibb Memorial Trust, Aris & Phillips.
   Google Scholar
• Whately, R. 1874. Historic Doubts Relative to Napoleon Bonaparte. 11th ed. Andover: Draper.
   Google Scholar
• al-Zabīdī, Muḥammad. 1888. Tāj al-’Arūs. 10 vols. Cairo: al-Maṭba‘a al-Khayrīya al-Munshaʿat bi-Jamālīya.
   Google Scholar