Responses of the earthworm Eisenia andrei exposed to sublethal aluminium levels in an artificial soil substrate

References

• Driscoll CT. A procedure for the fractionation of aqueous aluminum in dilute acidic waters. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 1984;16:267–283. doi: 10.1080/03067318408076957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips DR, Bolger T. Sublethal toxic effects of aluminum on the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Pedobiologia. 1998;42:125–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gestel CAM, Hoogerwerf G. Influence of soil pH on the toxicity of aluminium for Eisenia andrei (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) in an artificial soil substrate. Pedobiologia. 2001;45:385–395. doi: 10.1078/0031-4056-00094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ, Yang QR, Shi FL. Progress on the effect of aluminum to the human health and related safety. Chin J Heal Lab Technol. 2007;17:1326–1329. (in Chinese with English abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Vachon P, Tyagl RD, Auclalr JC. Chemical and biological leaching of aluminum from red mud. Environ Sci Technol. 1994;28:26–30. doi: 10.1021/es00050a005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto K, Isobe Y, Dong X, Gao S. Simulated acid rain leaching characteristics of acid soil amended with bio-briquette combustion ash. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2001;131:1451–1456. doi: 10.1023/A:1013913014071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehru B, Anand P. Oxidative damage following chronic aluminium exposure in adult and pup rat brains. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;19:203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia T, Esparza JL, Nogues MR. Oxidative stress status and RNA expression in Hippocampus of an animal model of Alzheimer's disease after chronic exposure to aluminum. Hippocampus. 2010;20:218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen Y, Miao L, Su J. Differential responses of anti-oxidative enzymes to aluminum stress in tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes. J Plant Nutr. 2009;32:1255–1270. doi: 10.1080/01904160903005988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldigo BP, Murdoch PS, Burns DA. Stream acidification and mortality of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in response to timber harvest in small Catskill Mountain Watersheds, New York, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2005;62:1168–1183. doi: 10.1139/f05-022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Chen D, Zhao C. Functions of earthworm in ecosystem. Biodivers Sci. 2007;15:142–153 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1360/biodiv.060294
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Liu X, Guo Y, Ma E. Activity of the enzymes of the antioxidative system in cadmium-treated Oxya chinensis (Orthoptera Acridoidae). Environ Toxicol Phar. 2005;20:412–416. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2005.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YS, Zeng ZL, Chen ZL, Robin P, Hassouna M, Qiu JP. Effects of roxarsone on CYP4501A and CYP4502B in Eisenia andrei. Agrochimica. 2007;51:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klara V, Jakub H. A comparison of POPs bioaccumulation in Eisenia fetida in natural and artificial soils and the effects of aging. Environ Pollut. 2012;160:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, James SW. Some new Korean Megascolecoid earthworms (Oligochaeta). J Nat Hist. 2009;43:1229–1256. doi: 10.1080/00222930902894096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundgren S, Nilsson P. Sublethal effects of aluminium on earthworms in acid soil: the usefulness of Dendrodrilus rubidus (Sav.) in a laboratory test system. Pedobiologia. 1997;41:417–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejada M, Gomez I, Hernandez T, Garcia C. Response of Eisenia fetida to the application of different organic wastes in an aluminium-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73:1944–1949. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman JG, Johnson DR, Stanley JK, Bednar AJ, Weiss CA, Boyd RE, Steevens JA. Assessing the fate and effects of nano aluminum oxide in the terrestrial earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010;29:1575–1580. doi: 10.1002/etc.196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou E, Loumbourdis NS. Exposure of the frog Rana nidibunda to copper impact on two biomarkers, lipid peroxidation and glutathione. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002;69:885–889. doi: 10.1007/s00128-002-0142-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehru B, Bhalla P. Aluminium-induced imbalance in oxidant and antioxidant determinants in brain regions of female rats: Protection by centrophenoxine. Toxicol Mech Method. 2006;16:21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks JM, Svendsen C. Neutral red retention by lysosomes from earthworm (Lumbricus rubellus) coelomocytes: A simple biomarker of exposure to soil copper. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1996;15:1801–1805. doi: 10.1897/1551-5028(1996)015<1801:NRRBLF>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao N-W, Song Y, Ge F, Liu X-H, Ou-Yang Z-Y. Biomarkers responses of the earthworm Eisenia fetida to acetochlor exposure in OECD soil. Chemosphere. 2006;65:907–912. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B-T, Kim K-W. Lysosomal membrane response of earthworm, Eisenia fetida, to arsenic contamination in soils. Environ Toxicol. 2009;24:369–376. doi: 10.1002/tox.20441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs J, Piola L, Prieto GE, Luisa OM, Basack S, Kesten E, Casabe N. Coelomocyte biomarkers in the earthworm Eisenia fetida exposed to 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT). Environ Monit Assess. 2011;175:127–137. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1499-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Francis J, Cooper EL, Fuller-Espie SL. Development of a flow cytometric, non-radioactive cytotoxicity assay in Eisenia fetida: An in vitro system designed to analyze immunosuppression of natural killer-like coelomocytes in response to 7,12 dimethylbenz a anthracene (DMBA). Eur J Soil Biol. 2007;43:S97–S103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. The current Organization of Economic and Cooperative Development acute earthworm toxicity test. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 207. Earthworm acute toxicity tests, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Denis M, Narbonne JF, Arnaud C, Ribera D. Biochemical responses of the earthworm Eisenia fetida andrei exposed to contaminated artificial soil: effects of lead acetate. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33:395–404. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00177-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Yang DL, Li ZG, Wang ZQ, Mao JY. Comparison studies on the methodology of extracting coelomcytes in earthworm used as a biomarker for the evaluation of the soil pollution. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Agricultural Science). 2011;29:1–5. (in Chinese with English abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Li JY, Xu RK, Ji GL. Determination of soluble al in acid soil solution using pectrophotometry with 8-hydroxyquinoline. Soils. 2004;36:307–309. (in Chinese with English abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Narin I, Tuzen M, Soylak M. Aluminium determination in environmental samples by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after solid phase extraction on Amberlite XAD-1180/pyrocatechol violet chelating resin. Talanta. 2004;63:411–418. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2003.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analyt Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena FJ, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Assessment of fresh and frozen-thawed boar semen using an Annexin-V assay: a new method of evaluating sperm membrane integrity. Theriogenology. 2003;60: 677–689. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00081-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• People's Liberation Army 59174 group. Relation of aluminum and its compounds with the cure and prevention of silicosis. Foreign Med Ref (Hygiene Section), 1975;6:328–332. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Labrot F, Ribera D, Saint-Denis M, Narbonne JF. In vitro and in vivo studies of potential biomarkers of lead and uranium contamination: lipid peroxidation, acetylcholinesterase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase activities in three non-mammalian species. Biomarkers. 1996;1:21–28. doi: 10.3109/13547509609079343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Lua Y, Shia Y, Chena C, Yang Z, Lid Y, Feng Y. Antioxidant and metabolic responses induced by cadmium and pyrene in the earthworm Eisenia fetida in two different systems: contact and soil tests. Chem Ecol. 2009;25:205–215. doi: 10.1080/02757540902942388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousef MI, Kamel KI, El-Guendi MI, El-Demerdash FM. An in vitro study on reproductive toxicity of aluminium chloride on rabbit sperm: The protective role of some antioxidants. Toxicology. 2007;239:213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posthuma L, Van Straalen N. Heavy metal adaptation in terrestrial invertebrates: a review of occurrence, genetics, physiology and ecological consequences. Comp Biochem Physiol C. 1993;100:11–38.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy P, Sreenivasula G. Modulations in antioxidant enzymes in the gill and hepatopancreas of the edible crab Scyllaserrata during exposure to cadmium and copper. Fresen Environ Bull. 1997;6:589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell A, Prasad KN, Bondy SC. Aluminum-induced oxidative events in cell lines: glioma are more responsive than neuroblastoma. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:1166–1171. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00308-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banni M, Chouchene L, Said K, Kerkeni A, Messaoudi I. Mechanisms underlying the protective effect of zinc and selenium against cadmium-induced oxidative stress in zebrafish Danio rerio. Biometals. 2011;24:981–992. doi: 10.1007/s10534-011-9456-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massicotte R, Robidoux PY, Sauve S, Flipo D, Mathiot A, Fournier M, Trottier B. Immunotoxicological response of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris following exposure to cement kiln dusts. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2004;59:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar