Works Cited
- Anand, Mulk Raj. “On the Genesis of Untouchable: A Note by Mulk Raj Anand.” South Asian Review 32.1 (2011): 133–36 Print.
- Anand, Mulk Raj. “The Sources of Protest in My Novels.” South Asian Review 32.1 (2011): 121–32. Print.
- Appadurai, Arjun. “Number in the Colonial Imagination.” Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Ed. Carol A. Breckinridge and Peter van der Veer. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1993. 314–40. Print
- Blackburn, Stuart H. and Vasudha Dalmia, eds. India's Literary History: Essays on the Nineteenth Century. New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004. Print.
- Breckenridge, Carol A. and Peter van der Veer, eds. Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1993. Print.
- Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2007. Print.
- Chatterjee, Partha. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World. London: Zed, 1986. Print.
- Chattopadhyay, Bankimchandra. The Poison Tree: a Tale of Hindu Life in Bengal. Trans. Miriam S. Knight. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1884. Print.
- Coppolla, Carlo, ed. Marxist Influences and South Asian Literature. East Lansing: Asian Studies Center, 1974. Print.
- Costa, Magda. “Interview with Anita Desai.” Lateral (March 2001). Sawnet. Web. 24 Feb. 2009.
- Dalmia, Vasudha. “Merchant Tales and the Emergence of the Novel in Hindi.” Economic and Political Weekly 43.34 (August 23–29, 2008): 43, 45–47, 49–60. Print.
- Ludden, David. “Orientalist Empiricism: Transformation of Colonial Knowledge.” Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Ed. Carol A. Breckinridge and Peter van der Veer. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1993. 250–78. Print.
- Faruqi, Shamsur Rahman. Sāhirī Shāhī Sāhibqirānī: Dāstān-i Amīr Hamzah K Mutaba'a, vol. 1. Delhi: Qaumi Kaunsil Bara 1 Farugh-1 Urdu Zaban, 1999. Print.
- Ghosh, Bishnupriya. “On Grafting the Vernacular: The Literary Consequences of Postcolonial Spectrology.” boundary 2 31.2 (2004): 197–214. Print.
- Gikandi, Simon. “This Thing Called Literature… What Work Does It Do?” PMLA 127.1 (2012): 9–21. Print.
- Guha, Ranajit. A Rule of Property for Bengal: An Essay on the Idea of Permanent Settlement. Durham: Duke UP, 1996. Print.
- Kumar, Udaya. “The Strange Homeliness of the Night: Spectral Speech and the Dalit Present in C. Ayyappan's Stories.” NYU Gallatin School. New York City, NY. 24 Oct. 2011.
- Kumar, Udaya. “Seeing and Reading: The Early Malayalam Novel and Some Questions of Visibility.” Early Novels in India. Ed. Meenakshi Mukherjee. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 2002. 161–92. Print.
- Mohanty, Satya P. “Introduction.” Six Acres and a Third: The Classic Nineteenth-Century Novel about Colonial India. Trans. Satya P. Mohanty, et al. Berkeley: U of California P, 2005. 1–33. Print.
- Mufti, Aamir R. “Faiz Ahmed Faiz: Towards a Lyric History of India.” Enlightenment in the Colony: The Jewish Question and the Crisis of Postcolonial Culture. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. 210–43. Print.
- Mukherjee, Meenakshi, ed. Early Novels in India. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 2002. Print.
- Nagaraj, D. R. The Flaming Feet and Other Essays: The Dalit Movement in India. London: Seagull, 2011. Print.
- Pandey, Gyan. “Unarchived Histories: The ‘Mad’ and the ‘Trifling.’” Economic and Political Weekly of India 47.1 (2012): 37–41. Print.
- Rushdie, Salman and Elizabeth West, eds. The Vintage Book of Indian Writing, 1947–97. New York: Vintage, 1997. Print.
- Sangari, Kumkum. “Multiple Temporalities, Unsettled Boundaries, Trickster Women Reading a Nineteenth Century Qissa.” Ed. Stuart H. Blackburn and Vasudha Dalmia. India's Literary History: Essays on the Nineteenth Century Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004, 213–50. Print.
- Senapati, Fakir Mohan. Six Acres and a Third: The Classic Nineteenth-Century Novel about Colonial India. Trans. Satya P. Mohanty et al. Berkeley: U of California P, 2005. Print.
- Simpson, J., and E. Weiner, Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP, 2009. Print.
- Verma, K. D. “Mulk Raj Anand and Realism.” South Asian Review 32.1 (2011): 137–51. Print.