550
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Capturing Citation Activity in Three Health Sciences Departments: A Comparison Study of Scopus and Web of Science

, &
Pages 190-201 | Received 01 Dec 2014, Accepted 06 Feb 2015, Published online: 30 Apr 2015

REFERENCES

  • Powell, K. “Measuring Nursing Faculty Impact: Web of Science versus Scopus.” Contributed poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Medical Library Association, Chicago, IL, May 2014.
  • Meho, Lokman I., and Kiduk Yang. “Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science Versus Scopus and Google Scholar.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, no. 13 (2007): 2105–2125. doi: 10.1002/asi.20677
  • Meho, Lokman I., and Cassidy R. Sugimoto. “Assessing the Scholarly Impact of Information Studies: A Tale of Two Citation Databases – Scopus and Web of Science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, no. 12 (2009): 2499–2508. doi: 10.1002/asi.21165
  • Bar-Ilan, Judit. “Which h-index?—A Comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar.” Scientometrics 74, no. 2 (2008): 257–271. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
  • De Groote, Sandra L., and Rebecca Raszewski. “Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A Case Study of the h-index in Nursing.” Nursing Outlook 60, no. 6 (November–December 2012): 391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007
  • Markpin, Teerasak, Nongyao Premkamolnetr, Santi Ittiritmeechai. “The Effects of Choice of Database and Data Retrieval Methods on Research Performance Evaluations of Asian Universities.” Online Information Review 37, no. 4 (2013): 538–563. doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2012-0050
  • Torres-Salinas, Daniel, Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cózar, and Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras. “Ranking of Departments and Researchers within a University Using Two Different Databases: Web of Science versus Scopus.” Scientometrics 80, no. 3 (2009): 761–774. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2113-9
  • Jacso, Peter. “Pragmatic Issues in Calculating and Comparing the Quantity and Quality of Research through Rating and Ranking of Researchers Based on Peer Reviews and Bibliometric Indicators from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar.” Online Information Review 34, no. 6 (2010): 972–982. doi: 10.1108/14684521011099432
  • Jacso, Peter. “Google Scholar Metrics for Publications: The Software and Content Features of a New Open Access Bibliometric Service.” Online Information Review 36, no. 4 (2012): 604–619. doi: 10.1108/14684521211254121
  • Levine-Clark, Michael, and Esther L. Gil. “A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.” Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 14, no. 1 (2009): 32–46. doi: 10.1080/08963560802176348
  • Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, Nurbek A. Akazhanov, Alexander A. Voronov, and George D. Kitas. “Systematic and Open Identification of Researchers and Authors: Focus on Open Researcher and Contributor ID.” Journal of Korean Medical Science 29, no. 11 (November 2014): 1453–1456. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.11.1453

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.