Instructing College Students on the Ethics of Information Use at the Reference Desk: A Guide and Literature Review

REFERENCES

• American Library Association. (2008). Code of ethics of the American Library Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/proethics/codeofethics/codeethics
   Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
   Google Scholar
• Association of Research Libraries. (n.d.). Copyright timeline: A history of copyright in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/copyright-ip/2486-copyright-timeline
   Google Scholar
• Auer, N. J., & Krupar, E. M. (2001). Mouse click plagiarism: The role of technology in plagiarism and the librarian’s role in combating it. Library Trends, 49, 415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, B. (2004). Should there be “privilege” in the relationship between reference librarian and patron? The Reference Librarian, 42, 301–311. doi:10.1300/J120v42n87_11
   Google Scholar
• Becker, R. (2010). International branch campuses: Trends and directions. International Higher Education, 58, 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, S. D. (2009). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, E. A., & Henderson, K. A. (2009). Case studies in library and information science ethics. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, C. A. (1999). Ethics and the reference librarian. The Reference Librarian, 31(66), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Deazley, R. (2006). Rethinking copyright: History, theory, language. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio, R. A. (1992). Privacy and accountability at the reference desk. The Reference Librarian, 17, 133–140. doi:10.1300/J120v17n38_16
   Google Scholar
• Emery, J. (2005). Is our best good enough? Educating end-users about licensing terms. Journal of Library Administration, 42(3-4), 27–39. doi:10.1300/J111v42n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Garoogian, R. (1991). Librarian/patron confidentiality: An ethical challenge. Library Trends, 40, 216–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germek, G. P. (2009). Imagine no possessions: Librarians, the net-generation student, and the imminent victory of plagiarism. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 16, 338–357. doi:10.1080/10691310903356000
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K. (2012). Stealing from the rich to entertain the poor? A survey of literature on the ethics of digital piracy. The Serials Librarian: From the Printed Page to the Digital Age, 63, 288–295. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2012.722595
   Google Scholar
• Harris, B. R. (2005). Credit where credit is due: Considering ethics, “ethos”, and process in library instruction on attribution. Education Libraries, 28(1), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptman, R. (1976). Professionalism or culpability? An experiment in ethics. Wilson Library Bulletin, 50, 626–627.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of International Education. (2012). Opendoors 20/12 “Fast facts.” Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/˜/media/Files/Corporate/Open-Doors/Fast-Facts/Fast%20Facts%202012.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Joint, N. (2006). Teaching intellectual property rights as part of the information literacy syllabus. Library Review, 55, 330–336.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, L. D. (2004). Integrating discipline-based anti-plagiarism instruction into the information literacy curriculum. Reference Services Review, 32, 347–355.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J. C. (1995). Protecting ideas and ideals: Copyright law in the People’s Republic of China. Law and Policy in International Business, 27, 1185–1211.
   Google Scholar
• Le Ha, P. (2006). Plagiarism and overseas students: Stereotypes again? ELT Journal, 60, 76–78. doi:10.1093/elt/cci085
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D. (2005). Plagiarism in ESOL students: Is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit? ELT Journal, 59, 234–241. doi:10.1093/elt/cci043
   Google Scholar
• Mages, W. K., & Garson, D. S. (2010). Get the cite right: Design and evaluation of a high-quality online citation tutorial. Library & Information Science Research, 32, 138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMenemy, D., Poulter, A., & Burton, P. F. (2007). A handbook of ethical practice: A practical guide to dealing with ethical issues in information and library work. Cambridge, UK: Chandos Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mundava, M., & Chaudhuri, J. (2007). Understanding plagiarism: The role of librarians at the University of Tennessee in assisting students to practice fair use of information. College & Research Libraries News, 68, 170–173.
   Google Scholar
• Nimsakont, E. D. (2008). How can academic librarians educate students about plagiarism? PNLA Quarterly, 72(3), 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. E. (2011). Ethical aspects of reference service. In R. E. Bopp & L. C. Smith ( Eds.), Reference and information services: An introduction (4th ed., pp. 29–56). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Schlipp, J., & Kocis, L. (2013). Using popular fiction to spark student creativity and to teach intellectual property information literacy (IPIL). Kentucky Libraries, 77(1), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sciammarella, S. (2009). Making a difference: Library and teaching faculty working together to develop strategies in dealing with student plagiarism. Community & Junior College Libraries, 15(1), 23–34. doi:10.1080/02763910802665086
   Google Scholar
• Stepchyshyn, V., & Nelson, R. S. (2007). Library plagiarism policies: CLIP Note #37. Chicago, IL: ACRL.
   Google Scholar
• The UK Copyright Service. (2011). Fact sheet P-08: The Berne Convention. Retrieved from http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p08_berne_convention
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. F., & McDonald, R. H. (2005). Millennial net value(s): Disconnects between libraries and the information age mindset. In M. Halbert ( Ed.), Free culture and the digital library symposium proceedings (pp. 93–105). Atlanta, GA: MetaScholar Initiative at Emory University.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S., & Duckett, K. (2010). “Why does Google Scholar sometimes ask for money?” Engaging science students in scholarly communication and the economics of information. Journal of Library Administration, 50, 349–372.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L. (2014). Principlism and the ethics of librarianship. The Reference Librarian, 55, 1–25. doi:10.1080/02763877.2014.853270
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. (2004). Academic original sin: Plagiarism, the internet, and librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30, 237–242. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2004.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Berne convention for the protection of literary and artistic works. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Intellectual property: Protection and enforcement. Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm
   Google Scholar