Wanting to Do More But Bound to Do Less: A Law Librarian’s Dilemma

REFERENCES

• Abrams, R. H., & Dunn, D. J. (1978). Law library’s institutional response to the pro se patron: A post-faretta review. Western New England Law Review, 1, 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlers, G. (2002). The history of law school libraries in the United States: From laboratory to cyberspace. Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein & Company.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Law Libraries. (1999). AALL ethical principles. Retrieved from http://www.aallnet.org/main-menu/Leadership-Governance/policies/PublicPolicies/policy-ethics.html
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Law Libraries. (2010). Competencies of law librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.aallnet.org/main-menu/Leadership-Governance/policies/PublicPolicies/competencies.html
   Google Scholar
• American Bar Association. (2013). Model rules of professional conduct. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.html
   Google Scholar
• American Library Association. (2013). Guidelines for behavioral performance of reference and information service providers. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/guidelinesbehavioral
   Google Scholar
• Arant, W., & Carpenter, B. (1999). Where is the line? Legal reference service and the unauthorized practice of law (UPL)—Some guides that might help. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(3), 235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigo, P. A. (2001). Taking time for legal research instruction at the reference desk. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 19, 75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, R. T. (1976). Reference librarian and the pro se patron. Law Library Journal, 69, 26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens, J. L. (2007). About Facebook—Change at the social-networking juggernaut creates new opportunities for law library outreach. AALL Spectrum, 12, 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Belle, J. (2012). Social media policies for character and fitness evaluations. Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts, 8, 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. C. (2009). Ethics of lawyer social networking. Albany Law Review, 73, 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Broussard, C. (2008). Teaching with technology: Is the pedagogical fulcrum shifting? New York School Law Review, 53, 903–915.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Y. (1994). From the reference desk to the jail house: Unauthorized practice of law and librarians. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 13, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, J. G. (2010). Digging for the digital dirt: Discovery and use of evidence from social media sites. SMU Science and Technology Law Review, 14, 465–496.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M. (2012). Resource-based learning and course design: A brief theoretical overview and practical suggestions. Law Library Journal, 104, 219–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. (2007). Are reference desks dying out? Librarians struggle to redefine–and in some cases eliminate–the venerable institution. The Reference Librarian, 48, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cofield, M., & Solon, K. (2012). Making the most of LibGuides in law libraries: How can law libraries leverage LibGuides? AALL Spectrum, 16, 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Condon, C. J. (2001). How to avoid the unauthorized practice of law at the reference desk. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 19, 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• DiBianca, M. M. (2011). Ethical risks arising from lawyers’ use of (and refusal to use) social media. Delaware Law Review, 12, 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett, T., Hambleton, J., Hazelton, P., Klinefelter, A., & Wright, J. (2011). Law library budgets in hard times. Law Library Journal, 103, 91–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, K. L. (2003). Serving pro se patrons: An obligation and an opportunity. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 22, 41–73.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, K. (1992). Lawyer-librarians in public law schools: The ethical conundrums of pro bono activities. Law Library Journal, 84, 31–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germain, C. (2007). Legal information management in a global and digital age: Revolution and tradition. International Journal of Legal Information, 35, 134–163.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, T. (2012). Facebook frenzy around the world: The different implications Facebook has on law students, lawyers, and judges. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 19, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. D. (1998). In search of the delicate balance: Legal and ethical questions in assisting the pro se patron. Law Library Journal, 90, 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. D. (2002). Pro se users, reference liability, and the unauthorized practice of law: Twenty-five selected readings. Law Library Journal, 94, 133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. D. (2014). Legal reference for librarians: How and where to find the answers. Chicago, IL: ALA Editions, American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hoorn, E., & van Hoorn, D. (2007). Critical assessment of using wikis in legal education. Journal of Information, Law and Technology, 2007(1), 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, C. B., Kajiwara, S., & Liu, M. (2001). The impact of the internet: Increasing the reference librarian’s role as teacher. The Reference Librarian, 35, 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• Janto, J. M., & Harrison-Cox, L. D. (1992). Teaching legal research: Past and present. Law Library Journal, 84, 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Y. P. (2006). Just the facts ma’am?: A contextual approach to the legal information use environment. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 357–359). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, T. (2005). Teaching legal research from the inside out. Law Library Journal, 97, 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, D. K., & American Bar Association Young Lawyers Division. (2011). The associate as rainmaker: Building your business brain. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, C. W. (1965). Mission of the legal reference librarian. Law Library Journal, 58, 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, M. E., Jr. & Minta, J. P. (2012). Lawyers and social media: The legal ethics of tweeting, Facebooking and blogging. Touro Law Review, 28, 149–182.
   Google Scholar
• Landsman, S. (2012). Pro se litigation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 231–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz, C. (2013). The public mission of the public law school library. Law Library Journal, 105, 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone, G. (1980). Malpractice liability of a law librarian. Law Library Journal, 73, 44–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, E. (2011). Authority without borders: The world wide web and the delegalization of law. Seton Hall Law Review, 41, 909–945.
   Google Scholar
• Moskovitz, M. (1992). Beyond the case method: It’s time to teach with problems. Journal of Legal Education, 42, 241–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, Jr., M. (1995). Authorized Practice of Legal Reference Service, The. Law Library Journal, 87, 203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murley, D. (2007). What is all the fuss about library 2.0. Law Library Journal, 100, 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, A. (2009). Are attorneys and judges one tweet, blog or friend request away from facing a disciplinary committee? Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 11, 511–540.
   Google Scholar
• Pabarcus, A. (2011). Are private spaces on social networking websites truly private–the extension of intrusion upon seclusion. William Mitchell Law Review, 38, 397–432.
   Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J. (2010). Cornerstones of law libraries for an era of digital-plus. Law Library Journal, 102, 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, M. (2012, November). As libraries go digital, sharing of data is at odds with tradition of privacy. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/As-Libraries-Go-Digital/135514/
   Google Scholar
• Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. O. (1948). Law school librarian. Journal of Legal Education, 1, 268–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protti, M. E. (1991). Dispensing law at the front lines: Ethical dilemmas in law librarianship. Library Trends, 40, 234–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roalfe, W. R. (1953). The libraries of the legal profession. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Roedger, A. (2010). Wall posts, status updates, and the bar: How social networking impacts character and fitness requirements. Journal of the Legal Profession, 35, 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Sadow, S., & Beede, B. R. (1975). Library Instruction in American Law Schools. Law Library Journal, 68, 27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanck, P. C. (1979). Unauthorized practice of law and the legal reference librarian. Law Library Journal, 72, 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, S. (2011). Seduced: For lawyers, the appeal of social media is obvious–it’s also dangerous. ABA Journal, 97, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Shrager, D. E. (2010). Moving past Web 2.0 h! An exploratory study of academic law libraries. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/aallcallforpapers/66
   Google Scholar
• Sims, L. (2004). Academic law library web sites: A source of service to the pro se user. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 23, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sonsteng, J. O., Ward, D., Bruce, C., & Petersen, M. (2007). Legal education renaissance: A practical approach for the twenty-first century. William Mitchell Law Review, 34, 303–472.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, A. B. (2012). Law school critique in historical perspective. Washington & Lee Law Review, 69, 1949–2063.
   Google Scholar
• Springshare. (2014). Libguides. Retrieved from http://www.springshare.com/libguides/
   Google Scholar
• St. Eve, A. J., & Zuckerman, M. A. (2012). Ensuring an impartial jury in the age of social media.Duke Law & Technology Review, 11, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, S. (2002). Trends in law library public services: Have you seen your patrons lately? AALL Spectrum, 6, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, K. M. (2007). Competencies of law librarianship: reference, research, and patron services. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 26, 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Vinson, K. E. (2010). Blurred boundaries of social networking in the legal field: just face it. University of Memphis Law Review, 41, 355–412.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteman, M. (2014). Book burning in the twenty-first century: ABA standard 606 and the future of academic law libraries as the smoke clears. Law Library Journal, 106, 11–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzleb, N. (2009). Engaging with the world: Students of comparative law write for Wikipedia. Legal Education Review, 19, 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Woxland, T. A. (1989). Why can’t Johnny research—or it all started with Christopher Columbus Langdell. Law Library Journal, 81, 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar