328
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Insights from Educational Psychology

Insights from Educational Psychology Part 12: Interventions and Collaborations

&

References

  • American Library Association. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education [Text]. Retrieved from Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) website: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  • American Psychological Association. (2013). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/about/undergraduate-major
  • Black, S., & Allen, J. D. (2017). Insights from educational psychology part 3: College student development. Reference Librarian, 58(3), 214–228. doi:10.1080/02763877.2016.1276505
  • Black, S., & Krawczyk, R. (2017). Brief intervention to change students’ attitudes regarding library research. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(4), 277–284. doi:10.5860/rusq.56.4.277
  • Brady, L. L. C., & Malik, M. (2019). Science, story, and structure: Framing the conversation for psychology faculty and librarian information literacy collaboration. Teaching of Psychology, 46(1), 64–71. doi:10.1177/0098628318816155
  • Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2017). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing skills. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 773–799. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9421-7
  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
  • Felten, P., & Chick, N. (2018). Is SoTL a signature pedagogy of educational development? To Improve the Academy, 37(1), 4–16. doi:10.1002/tia2.20077
  • Guth, L. F., Arnold, J. M., Bielat, V. E., Perez-Stable, M. A., & Meer, P. F. V. (2018). Faculty voices on the framework: Implications for instruction and dialogue. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 18(4), 693–718. doi:10.1353/pla.2018.0041
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., & Priniski, S. J. (2018). Improving student outcomes in higher education: The science of targeted intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 409–435. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725
  • Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602–640. doi:10.3102/0034654315617832
  • Mazella, D., Heidel, L., & Ke, I. (2011). Integrating reading, information literacy, and literary studies instruction in a three-way collaboration. Learning Assistance Review, 16(2), 41–53.
  • McAdoo, M. L. (2010). Building bridges: Connecting faculty, students, and the college library. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  • Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students’ beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213–225. doi:10.1037/a0029690
  • Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. doi:10.1177/0956797615571017
  • POD network. (n.d.). Retrieved from POD Network: Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education website: https://podnetwork.org/
  • Raspa, R., & Ward, D. (Eds.). (2000). The collaborative imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
  • Rosman, T., Peter, J., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2018). Conceptions of scientific knowledge influence learning of academic skills: Epistemic beliefs and the efficacy of information literacy instruction. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 96–113. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1156666
  • Schwartz, D. L., Cheng, K. M., Salehi, S., & Wieman, C. (2016). The half empty question for socio-cognitive interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 397–404. doi:10.1037/edu0000122
  • Serpico, J. M. (2016). Reaching university students via partnerships with non-academic departments. Proceedings of the Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians, 2. Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/pcel/article/view/1457
  • Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/bjep.12067
  • Stephens, N. M., Hamedani, M. G., & Destin, M. (2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25(4), 943–953. doi:10.1177/0956797613518349
  • Storms, M. D., & McCaul, K. D. (1976). Attribution processes and emotional exacerbation of dysfunctional behavior. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 143–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Walton, G. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 73–82. doi:10.1177/0963721413512856
  • Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. doi:10.1126/science.1198364
  • Wilson, T. D., Damiani, M., & Shelton, N. (2002). Improving the academic performance of college students with brief attributional interventions. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 89–108). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559–580. doi:10.1037/a0037637
  • Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301. doi:10.3102/0034654311405999

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.