Improving Social Quality in Housing Complexes for Older Adults: Professional Support as a Necessary Condition

References

• Bigonnesse, C., & Chaudhury, H. (2019). The landscape of “aging in place” in gerontology literature: Emergence, theoretical perspectives and influencing factors. Journal of Housing for the Elderly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, J., Czaja, R., & Blair, E. (2014). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., & Henkin, N. (2014). Building communities for all ages: Lessons learned from an intergenerational community-building initiative. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 63–68. doi:10.1002/casp.2172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617. doi:10.1177/0261018311430457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffel, T., Verté, D., De Donder, L., De Witte, N., Dury, S., Vanwing, T., & Bolsenbroek, A. (2012). Theorising the relationship between older people and their immediate social living environment. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(1), 13–32. doi:10.1080/02601370.2012.636577
   Google Scholar
• Cannuscio, C., Block, J., & Kawachi, I. (2003). Social capital and successful aging: The role of senior housing. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(5), 395–399. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_Part_2-200309021-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, R., Leamy, M., Miller, V., & Bright, L. (2005). Housing decisions in later life (pp. 45–67). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230005938_3
   Google Scholar
• Cornwell, B., Laumann, E. O., & Schumm, L. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American sociological review, 73(2), 185–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong-Gierveld, J., & Kamphuls, F. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(3), 289–299. doi:10.1177/014662168500900307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derkx, P. (2016). Humanism as a meaning frame. In A. B. Pinn (Eds.), What is humanism and why does it matter? (pp. 56–72). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emlet, C. A., & Moceri, J. T. (2012). The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1. doi:10.1155/2012/173247
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, K. G., & Caro, F. G. (2014). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 1–18. doi:10.1080/08959420.2014.860786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., & De Jong, E. (2009). Community and health. Immigrant senior cohousing in the Netherlands. Communities: Life in Cooperative Culture, 145, 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2005). Contexts of ageing: Class, cohort and community. Cambridge; Oxford; New York: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of the grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, E. A., & Mauldin, R. L. (2017). Participation in community activities through naturally occurring retirement community (NORC) supportive service programs. Ageing and Society, 37(10), 1987–2011. doi:10.1017/S0144686X16000702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaida, L., & Boyd, M. (2011). Poverty variations among the elderly: The roles of income security policies and family co-residence. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 30(1), 83–100. doi:10.1017/S0714980810000814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, D. W. (2005). Cultural factors and preferred living arrangement of aging Chinese Canadians. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 19(2), 71–86. doi:10.1300/J081v19n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, M. P. (1983). Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. The Gerontologist, 23(4), 349–357. doi:10.1093/geront/23.4.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, R. (2017). Housing for seniors: Challenges and solutions, evidence matters. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research/Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Liddle, J., Scharf, T., Bartlam, B., Bernard, M., & Sim, J. (2014). Exploring the age-friendliness of purpose-built retirement communities: Evidence from England. Ageing and Society, 34(9), 1601–1629. doi:10.1017/S0144686X13000366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, C. W., Everingham, J. A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age‐friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116–121. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machielse, A., Bos, P., Vaart, W. van der, & Thoolen, E. (2017). Experiment Vitale Woongemeenschappen. [Experiment Vital Communities]. Den Haag: Platform31.
   Google Scholar
• Mathie, A., & Cunningham, G. (2003). From clients to citizens: Asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice, 13(5), 474–486. doi:10.1080/0961452032000125857
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Olsberg, D., & Winters, M. (2005). Ageing in place: Intergenerational and intrafamilial housing transfers and shifts in later life. (AHURI Final Report No. 88). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pardasani, M., & Thompson, P. (2012). Senior centers: Innovative and emerging models. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 31(1), 52–77. doi:10.1177/0733464810380545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and methods: Integrating theory and practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penninx, K. (2016). Experiment Vitale woongemeenschappen. Handreiking voor initiatiefgroepen Studio BRUIS. [Experiment vital living communities. Guide for active resident groups studio BRUIS]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Platform 31.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M., & Warburton, J. (2012). Residential complexes in Queensland, Australia: A space of segregation and ageism? Ageing & Society, 32(1), 60–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillipson, C. (2011). Developing age-friendly communities: New approaches to growing old in urban environments. In R. Settersten (Ed.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 279–293). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7374-0_18
   Google Scholar
• Pynoos, J. (2018). The future of housing for the elderly: Four strategies that can make a difference. Public Policy & Aging Report, 00(1–4), 1–4. doi:10.1093/ppar/pry006
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A. (2012). Creating aging-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing International, 37(1), 25–38. doi:10.1007/s12126-011-9140-1
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2013). Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Ageing and Society, 33(1), 110–136. doi:10.1017/S0144686X12000578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, A., & Schelling, H. R. (2018). Attitudes toward aging and retirement homes before and after entry into a retirement home. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 32(1), 12–25. doi:10.1080/02763893.2017.1393484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singelenberg, J., Stolarz, H., & McCall, M. E. (2014). Integrated service areas: An innovative approach to housing, services and supports for older persons ageing in place. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 69–73. doi:10.1002/casp.2175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, T. G. M., & Ache, P. M. (2018). Assessing social quality of sheltered independent housing: Challenges of scale and group mix. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33(2), 339–358. doi:10.1007/s10901-017-9567-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaart, W. van der., Egmond, M. van., Machielse, A., & Bos, P. (2017). Onderzoek Vitale Woongemeenschappen. [Study Vital Living Communities. Baseline measurement and follow-up measurement]. Utrecht: Universiteit voor Humanistiek.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K., O’Shea, E., Scharf, T., & Shucksmith, M. (2014). Exploring the impact of informal practices on social exclusion and age‐friendliness for older people in rural communities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 37–49. doi:10.1002/casp.2176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffers, M., & Stam, B. (2018). Evaluatie ‘Voor Mekaar’. [Evaluation ‘For Each Other’]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Gemeente Rotterdam Onderzoek en Business Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• WRR. (2017). Weten is nog geen doen. Een realistisch perspectief op redzaamheid. [Knowing is not doing. A realistic perspective on self-reliance]. WRR-R097. The Hague, The Netherlands: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR) [Scientific Council for Government Policy].
   Google Scholar