Review of the quality of printed patient education materials on asthma available in primary care in Singapore

References

• Asthma: Health Promotion Board; 2018. Available from: https://www.healthhub.sg/a-z/diseases-and-conditions/11/asthma [updated January 29, 2018; last accessed 26 August 18].
   Google Scholar
• Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, Beasley R. Review article The global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee Report. Allergy 2004;59:469–478. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00526.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim T, Chay O. Fatal asthma in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2012;41:187–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh MS, Yii AC, Ong YY. Asthma in Singapore: past, present and future. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2017;46:81–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 2000;15:259–267. doi:10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Expectations outpace reality: physicians' use of care management tools for patients with chronic conditions. Med Benef 2010;27:2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Studying Health System C. Health Tracking Physician Survey, 2008 [United States]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Graham C, Reynard JM, Turney BW. Consent information leaflets – readable or unreadable? J Clin Urol 2015;8:177–182. doi:10.1177/2051415814555947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustersic M, Gauchet A, Foote A, Bosson JL. How best to use and evaluate patient information leaflets given during a consultation: a systematic review of literature reviews. Health Expect 2017;20:531–542. doi:10.1111/hex.12487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson PG, Powell H, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, Abramson M, Haywood P, et al. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. The Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews. 2003;1:CD001117. PubMed PMID: 12535399.
   Google Scholar
• Smith H, Gooding S, Brown R, Frew A. Evaluation of readability and accuracy of information leaflets in general practice for patients with asthma. Br Med J 1998; 317:264. doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7153.264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin HS, Gupta RS, Tomopoulos S, Wolf MS, Mendelsohn AL, Antler L, Sanchez DC, Lau CH, Dreyer BP. Readability, suitability, and characteristics of asthma action plans: examination of factors that may impair understanding. Pediatrics 2013;131:e116.doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2572–2580. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastable SB. Essentials of Patient Education: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2006. Available from: https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=hyCLMdheGmwC.
   Google Scholar
• Brega AG, Freedman MAG, LeBlanc WG, Barnard J, Mabachi NM, Cifuentes M, Albright K, Weiss BD, Brach C, West DR. Using the health literacy universal precautions toolkit to improve the quality of patient materials. J Health Commun 2015;20:69–76. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1081997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker RM, Ratzan SC, Lurie N. Health literacy: a policy challenge for advancing high-quality health care. Health Aff 2003;22:147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assess, select, and create easy-to-understand materials: tool #11: agency for healthcare research and quality, Rockville, MD; [updated February 2015]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/literacy-toolkit/healthlittoolkit2-tool11.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kher A, Johnson S, Griffith R. Readability assessment of online patient education material on congestive heart failure. Adv Prevent Med 2017;2017:1. PubMed PMID: PMC5471568. doi:10.1155/2017/9780317.
   Google Scholar
• Education System in Singapore: Foreign Credits, Inc. 2012. Available from: https://www.scholaro.com/ed/Countries/Singapore/Education-System [last accessed 28 August 18].
   Google Scholar
• A Simple Flowchart Comparison Of Singapore's And American Education Systems: SGBox. Available from: http://www.sgbox.com/singaporeuseducation.html [last accessed 28 August 18].
   Google Scholar
• Trevor JL, Chipps BE. Severe asthma in primary care: identification and management. Am J Med 2018;131:484–491. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L-W, Miller MJ, Schmitt MR, Wen FK. Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. Res Soc Admin Pharm 2013;9:503–516. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav 2006;33:352–373. doi:10.1177/1090198105277329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin GH. SMOG grading: a new readability formula. J Read 1969;12:639–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Communications NCIOoC. Making Health Communication Programs Work: A Planner's Guide. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2004. p. 162–163.
   Google Scholar
• Southwood S. SMOG calculator: National Learning and Work Institute. Available from: https://www.learningandwork.org.uk/SMOG-calculator/smogcalc.php [last accessed 28 August 18].
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid JP, Fishburne RPJ, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Institute for Simulation and Training, 1/1/1975. Report No.: Contract No.: 56.
   Google Scholar
• Creating clear print and large print documents. UK Association for Accessible Formats (UKAAF). 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns 2014;96:395–403. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storino A, Castillo-Angeles M, Watkins AA, Vargas C, Mancias JD, Bullock A, Demirjian A, Moser J, Kent TS. Assessing the accuracy and readability of online health information for patients with pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 2016;151:831–837. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2018. Available from: www.ginasthma.org.
   Google Scholar
• DuBay WH. The principles of readability. Online Submission. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• R Fitzsimmons P, D Michael B, L Hulley J, O Scott G. A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information. 2010;40:292–296. doi:10.4997/JRCPE.2010.401.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace LS, Roskos SE, Weiss BD. Readability characteristics of consumer medication information for asthma inhalation devices. J Asthma 2006;43:375–378. doi:10.1080/02770900600709856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics SDo. M850581 – Singapore Residents Aged 25 Years & Over By Highest Qualification Attained, Sex And Age Group, Annual: Singapore Department of Statistics 2017. Available from: http://www.tablebuilder.singstat.gov.sg/publicfacing/createDataTable.action?refId=12078 [updated 2nd Jan 2018; cited 29 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Saha S. Improving literacy as a means to reducing health disparities. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:893–895. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00546.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagan TML, Gulsvik A, Eide GE, Bakke PS. The effect of educational level on the incidence of asthma and respiratory symptoms. Respir Med 2004;98:730–736. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2004.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• How to write in plain English. 2018. Available from: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/howto.pdf [last accessed 3 September 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kauchak D, Leroy G. Moving beyond readability metrics for health-related text simplification. IT Professional 2016;18:45–51. doi:10.1109/MITP.2016.50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy G, Kauchak D. The effect of word familiarity on actual and perceived text difficulty. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:e169–ee72. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling J, van Schaik P. The influence of line spacing and text alignment on visual search of web pages. Displays 2007;28:60–67. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagassé LP, Rimal RN, Smith KC, Storey JD, Rhoades E, Barnett DJ, et al. How Accessible Was Information about H1N1 Flu? Literacy Assessments of CDC Guidance Documents for Different Audiences. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e23583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023583.
   Google Scholar
• Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006;61:173–190. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morony S, McCaffery KJ, Kirkendall S, Jansen J, Webster AC. Health literacy demand of printed lifestyle patient information materials aimed at people with chronic kidney disease: are materials easy to understand and act on and do they use meaningful visual aids? J Health Commun 2017;22:163–170. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1258744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin MA, Catrambone CD, Kee RA, Evans AT, Sharp LK, Lyttle C, Rucker-Whitaker C, Weiss KB, Shannon JJ, Chicago Initiative to Raise Asthma Health Equity Investigative Team. Improving asthma self-efficacy: developing and testing a pilot community-based asthma intervention for African American adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;123:153–159.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.10.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney M. Patient leaflets: “a stupid system”. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2013;347:16.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy J, Pravallika T, Maddela J, Akula S. Health information in hospital waiting rooms, can it act as a vector in health promotion? Survey among patients attending medical and dental hospitals. J Dent Res Rev 2017;4:97–100. doi:10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_57_17.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwin HN, McKeown M, Evans MF, Bhattacharyya OK. The waiting room “wait”: from annoyance to opportunity. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:479–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Household Survey. Singapore Department of Statistics 2015. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, 153A. Sect. Part XIII General Provisions.
   Google Scholar
• Martin IP, Reconceptualizing English Education in a Multilingual Society: English in the Philippines: Springer Singapore. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. The Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews. 2006;3:CD004563. PubMed PMID: 16856050.
   Google Scholar
• Wong K, Gilad A, Cohen MB, Kirke DN, Jalisi SM. Patient education materials assessment tool for laryngectomy health information. Head Neck 2017;39:2256–2263. doi:10.1002/hed.24891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne H. Health literacy from A to Z: practical ways to communicate your health message: Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, c2013. 2nd ed.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Calderón JL, Morales LS, Liu H, Hays RD. Variation in the readability of items within surveys. Am J Med Qual 2006;21:49–56. doi:10.1177/1062860605283572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar