Nanoregulation along the product life cycle in the EU, Switzerland, Thailand, the USA, and intergovernmental organisations, and its compatibility with WTO law

References

• Cheyne, I. 2012. “Consumer Labelling in EU and WTO Law.” In Liberalising Trade in the EU and the WTO’, edited by S. E. Gaines, B. E. Olsen, and K. E. Sorensen, 309–332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cottier, T., M. Oesch, and T. M. Fischer. 2005. International Trade Regulation: Law and Policy in the WTO, the European Union and Switzerland. Bern: Staempfli Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cottier, T., T. Naef, T. Payosova, R. Polanco, V. Saco, and C. Sieber-Gasser. 2013. “The Jurisprudence of the World Trade Organization in 2012.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Internationales und Europäisches Recht 2013(3): 505–540.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2017a. Working guidance on EPA’s Section 8(a) information gathering rule on nanomaterials in commerce. Washington DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-08/documents/august_2017guidance.8-7-2017_002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2017b. “Chemical Substances When Manufactured or Processed as Nanoscale Materials; TSCA Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements. Action: Final rule.” Federal Register of the USA 82 (8): 3641–3655.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency. 2018. ECHA Welcomes Improved Clarity on Nanomaterials in the EU – Member States Vote to Amend REACH Annexes. ECHA/NR/18/23. https://echa.europa.eu/de/-/echa-welcomes-improved-clarity-on-nanomaterials-in-the-eu-member-states-vote-to-amend-reach-annexes
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the Definition of Nanomaterial (2011/696/EU).” Official Journal of the European Union L275: 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. ROADMAP: Review and Potential Revision of the EU Recommendation on the Definition of Nanomaterial (No 2011/696). Ref. Ares (2017)4513169 – 15/09/2017. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-2017-4513169.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. “COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2018/1881 of 3 December 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annexes I, III,VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, and XII to address nanoforms of substances.” Official Journal of the European Union L308: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission’s Science and Knowledge Service. 2017. The novel EU legislative framework for medical technology. Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Euronanoforum. http://euronanoforum2017.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Session-3-Pilar-Aguar-The-novel-EU-legislative-framework-for-medical-technology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gehr, P. 2017. NRP64, Opportunities and Risks of Nanomaterials: Results, Outcome and Perspectives – Final Brochure. http://www.nfp64.ch/SiteCollectionDocuments/Final_Brochure_NRP64_E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karlaganis, G., and R. Liechti. 2013. “The Regulatory Framework for Nanomaterials at a Global Level: SAICM and WTO Insights.” Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 22 (2): 163–173. doi:10.1111/reel.12031.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, P. B., D. V. Christophersen, and D. N. Andersen. 2019. The Applicability of the GHS Classification Criteria to Nanomaterials. Nordic Council of Ministers NA2019:907, ISSN 2311-0562. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1315194/FULLTEXT02
   Google Scholar
• Marceau, G., and J. P. Trachtman. 2014. “A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation on Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.” Journal of World Trade 48(2): 351–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, M., A. Hermann, R. Grob, M.-O. Diesner, P. Küppers, W. Luther, N. Malanowski, D. Haus, and A. Zweck. 2013. Nanomaterialien: Auswirkungen auf Umwelt und Gesundheit [Nanomaterials: Environmental and Health Implications]. Edited by TA-SWISS – Zentrum für Technologiefolgen-Abschätzung, 58–59. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, M., U. Eberle, A. Hermann, K. Moch, and B. Stratmann. 2009. Nanotechnologie im Bereich der Lebensmittel [Nanotechnology in the Area of Foodstuffs]. Edited by TA-SWISS – Zentrum für Technologiefolgen-Abschätzung. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag, ETH.
   Google Scholar
• NANOTEC. 2016. NanoQ Label awarded to Kanzen International. https://www2.nanotec.or.th/en/?p=9958 .
   Google Scholar
• NANOTEC. 2017. Nanosafety and ethics strategic plan 2017-2021. https://www2.nanotec.or.th/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Nanosafety-Soft-file.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NANOTEC. 2018a. Nanotechnology development in Thailand. http://www2.nanotec.or.th/en/?page_id=1016.
   Google Scholar
• NANOTEC. 2018b. About NANOTEC. http://www2.nanotec.or.th/en/?page_id=1899.
   Google Scholar
• Nanowerk. 2012. First NanoQ label awarded in Thailand. http://www.nanowerk.com/news2/newsid=26845.php
   Google Scholar
• SAICM (Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management). 2015. Emerging policy issue update on nanotechnologies and manufactured nanomaterials. SAICM//ICCM.4/INF/19. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• SRU (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen). 2012. Vorsorgestrategien für Nanomaterialien – Sondergutachten. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Studer, C., L. Aicher, B. Gasic, N. von Goetz, P. Hoet, J. Huwyler, R. Kägi et al. 2015. “Scientific Basis for Regulatory Decision-Making of Nanomaterials, Report on the Workshop, 20–21 January 2014, Center of Applied Ecotoxicology, Dübendorf.” Chimia 69: 52–56. doi:10.2533/chimia.2015.52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUVA (Schweizer Unfallversicherungsanstalt). 2012. Factsheet – Nanopartikel und ultrafeine Partikel am Arbeitsplatz. [Factsheet – Nanoparticles and Ultrafine Particles]. http://www.suva.ch/arbeitsmedizin-factsheets .
   Google Scholar
• SUVA (Schweizer Unfallversicherungsanstalt). 2018. Grenzwerte am Arbeitsplatz. [Occupational Limit Values]. Publikationsnummer 1903.d: 29. http://www.suva.ch .
   Google Scholar
• ThaiLaws.com. 2008. Translation, 2551. Hazardous Substance Act, B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended until No 3 Act.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods and on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals. 2017. “ST/SG/AC.10/C.4/68 Report of the Sub-Committee of Experts on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals on its thirty-fourth session, held in Geneva from 6 to 8 December 2017.” Paragraph 31: 7.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2017. Frontiers 2017 – Emerging Issues of Environmental Concern. Nairobi. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/frontiers-2017-emerging-issues-environmental-concern
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2006. The Ethics and Politics of Nanotechnology. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNITAR (United Nations Institute for Training and Research). 2011. Guidance for Developing a National Nanotechnology Policy and Programme. http://cwm.unitar.org/national-profiles/publications/cw/Nano/UNITAR_nano_guidance_Pilot_Edition_2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., and W. Zdouc. 2017. The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization. Text, Cases and Materials. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Teunenbroek, T. 2017. NANoREG, A Common European Approach to the Regulatory Testing of Nanomaterials. Grant Agreement number: NMP-LA-2013-310584. https://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Download_PDF/Nanotechnologie/nanoreg_uebersicht_bf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ward, H. 2002. Science and Precaution in the Trading System. Seminar Note, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA). https://www.iisd.org/pdf/sci_precaution.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). 2017. WHO guidelines on protecting workers from potential risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Geneva. http://www.who.int/occupational_health/publications/manufactured-nanomaterials/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, S.W.P., A. G. Oomen, A.J.A.M. Sips, F.C. Bourgeois, G.J.P.M. te Dorsthorst, M.W. Kooi, and M.I. Bakker. 2010. Development of an inventory for consumer products containing nanomaterials (Final Report). Investigation carried out at the request of DG Environment by RIVM NL within the frame-work of ENV/D3/SER/2010/0060r.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2001. AB. 5 April 2001. European communities − measures affecting asbestos and asbestos-containing products. WT/DS135/AB/R (EC–Asbestos).
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2006. Panel. 29 September 2006. European communities – measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products (EC – Biotech). WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2007. AB. 17 December 2007. Brazil – measures affecting imports of retreaded tyres. WT/DS332/AB/R, (Brazil – Retreaded Tyres).
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012a. AB. 13 June 2012. United States – measures concerning the importation, marketing and sale of tuna and tuna products. WT/DS381/AB/R, (US – Tuna II (Mexico)).
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012b. AB. 23 July 2012. United States – certain country of origin labelling (COOL) requirements. WT/DS384, 386/AB/R, (US-COOL).
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012c. AB. 24 April 2012. United States – measures affecting the production and sale of clove cigarettes. WT/DS406/AB/R; (US – Clove).
   Google Scholar
• WTO Agreement. 1994. 15 April. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (hereafter Marrakesh Agreement).
   Google Scholar
• WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), Annex 1 to the Marrakesh Agreement, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS), Annex 1A to the Marrakesh Agreement, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. GATT 1994.
   Google Scholar