Ultrasound pretreatment and enzymatic deinking by using bacterial cellulases from rice husk

Reference

• Lee, K. C.; Tong, W. Y.; Ibrahim, D.; Arai, T.; Murata, Y.; Mori, Y.; Kosugi, A. Evaluation of Enzymatic Deinking of Non-Impact Ink Laser-Printed Paper Using Crude Enzyme from Penicillium rolfsii C3-2(1) IBRL. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 451–463. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-016-2223-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmah, S. A.; Aisya, N.; Fithri, L.; Pratama, A.; Darmokoesoema, H.; Rohman, A.; Puspaningsih, N. N. T. Exploration and Analysis of a Lignocellulase Consortium for Deinking of Recycled Paper in the Eco-Paper Industry. J. Chem. Technol. Metall. 2020, 55, 389–396.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, S.; Shikha; Bhan, C.; Chandra, R.; Tyagi, S. Laccase Based De-Inking of Mixed Office Waste and Evaluation of Its Impact on Physico-Optical Properties of Recycled Fiber. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 1, 233–244. DOI: 10.1007/s42398-018-0021-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, M.; Khodaparast, Z. Review on Recent Developments on Pulp and Paper Mill Wastewater Treatment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 326–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasheva, V.; Todorova, D.; Kotlarova, S.; Kamburov, M. Deinking of Waste Offset Printed Paper by the Use of Enzymes. Sci. Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. High Technol. Business Soc. 2016, I, 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuka, F. O.; Orji, F. A.; Uzeh, R. E.; Ugoji, E. O. Properties of Bacterial Cellulases and Secondary Metabolites of Cellulolytic Bacterial Fermentation of Rice Husks. Asian J. Biotechnol. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 2, 1–11. DOI: 10.9734/AJB2T/2017/35196.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveros, D. F.; Guarnizo, N.; Perea, E. M.; Arango, W. M. Cellulase Activity of Filamentous Fungi Induced by Rice Husk. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 13, 4236–4245. DOI: 10..5897/A.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, G. J.; Zhou, Y. J.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, K. K.; Zhao, X. B.; Zhang, T.; Liu, D. H. Pretreatment of Rice Hulls for Cellulase Production by Solid Substrate Fermentation. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2007, 27, 65–71. DOI: 10.1080/02773810701486675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roushdy, M. M. Biodeinking of Photocopier Waste Paper Effluent by Fungal Cellulase under Solid State Fermentation. J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol. 2015, 2, 190–199. DOI: 10.9734/JABB/2015/15378.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsumi, D.; Higashihara, T.; Kawamura, S.; Matsumoto, T. Ultrasonic Treatment to Improve the Quality of Recycled Pulp Fiber. Japan Wood Res. Soc. 2000, 46, 405–409. DOI: 10.1007/BF00776405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Q.; Yang, G.; Wang, Q.; Sun, Q.; Lucia, L. A.; Chen, J. Ultrasound-Assisted Xylanase Treatment of Chemi-Mechanical Poplar Pulp. BioResources 2016, 11, 4104–4112. DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.2.4104-4112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M.; Yao, S.; Zhou, S. K.; Zhao, Q.; Lin, J. H.; Pu, J. W. The Influence of Ultrasonic Treatment on the Bleaching of CMP Revealed by Surface and Chemical Structural Analyses. BioResources 2010, 5(3), 1353–1365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X.; Jiang, Z.; Li, H.; Li, W. Production of Recycled Cellulose Fibers from Waste Paper via Ultrasonic Wave Processing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/app.41962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virk, A. P.; Puri, M.; Gupta, V.; Capalash, N.; Sharma, P. Combined Enzymatic and Physical Deinking Methodology for Efficient Eco-Friendly Recycling of Old Newsprint. PLoS One 2013, 8, e72346. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jannah, A.; Aulanniam, Ardyati.; T.; Suharjono. Isolation, Cellulase Activity Test and Molecular Identification of Selected Cellulolytic Bacteria Indigenous Rice Bran. Indones. J. Chem. 2018, 18, 514–521. DOI: 10.22146/ijc.26783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gea, S.; Oktari, N.; Andriayani, A.; Rahayu, S.; Piliang, A. F. Comparative Optimization of Cellulase and Laccase Enzymes in Deinking Process of Used Newspapers. J. Kim. Sains Dan Appl. 2020, 23, 353–359. DOI: 10.14710/jksa.23.10.353-359.
   Google Scholar
• Teather, R. M.; Wood, P. J. Use of Congo Red-Polysaccharide Interactions in Enumeration and Characterization of Cellulolytic Bacteria from the Bovine Rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 43, 777–780. DOI: 10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewiyanti, I.; Darmawi, D.; Muchlisin, Z. A.; Helmi, T. Z.; Arisa, I. I.; Rahmiati, R.; Destri, E. Cellulase Enzyme Activity of the Bacteria Isolated from Mangrove Ecosystem in Aceh Besar and Banda Aceh. IOP Conf. Series EarthEnviron. Sci. 2022, 951, 012113. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/951/1/012113.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, P.; Singh, T.; Bedi, S. Characterization of the Cellulolytic Enzyme Produced by Streptomyces griseorubens (Accession No. AB184139) Isolated from Indian Soil. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci 2013, 25, 245–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2013.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. J.; Kim, B. K.; Lee, B. H.; Jo, K. I.; Lee, N. K.; Chung, C. H.; Lee, Y. C.; Lee, J. W. Purification and Characterization of Cellulase Produced by Bacillus Amyoliquefaciens DL-3 Utilizing Rice Hull. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 378–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbarpour, I.; Ghasemian, A.; Resalati, H.; Saraeian, A. Biodeinking of Mixed ONP and OMG Waste Papers with Cellulase. Cellulose 2018, 25, 1265–1280. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-017-1641-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaquere-Parker, A. C.; Ahmed, A.; Isola, T.; Marong, B.; Shacklady, C.; Tchoua, P. Temperature Effect on an Ultrasound-Assisted Paper de-Inking Process. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2009, 16, 698–703. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darjana, Z.; Ivetic; Omorjan, R. P.; Dordevic, T. R.; Antov, M. G. The Impact of Ultrasound Pretreatment on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose from Sugar Beet Shreds: Modeling of the Experimental Results. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2017, 36, 1164–1172. DOI: 10.1002/ep.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q. H.; Wang, Y. P.; Qin, M. H.; Fu, Y. J.; Li, Z. Q.; Zhang, F. S.; Li, J. H. Surface Characterizatition of Old Newsprint Pulp Deinking by Combining Hemicellulace with Laccase Mediator System. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 6536–6540. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efrati, Z.; Talaeipour, M.; Khakifirouz, A.; Bazyar, B. Impact of Cellulase Enzyme Treatment on Strength, Morphology and Crystallinity of Deinked Pulp. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2013, 47, 547–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chutani, P.; Sharma, K. K. Concomitant Production of Xylanases and Cellulases from Trichoderma longibrachiatum MDU-6 Selected for the Deinking of Paper Waste. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 747–758. DOI: 10.1007/s00449-016-1555-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. K.; Ibrahim, D.; Omar, I. C.; Rosli, W. D. W. Enzymatic and Chemical Deinking of Mixed Office Wastepaper and Old Newspaper: Paper Quality and Effluent Characteristics. BioResources 2011, 6, 3809–3823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campano, C.; Lopez-Exposito, P.; Blanco, A.; Negro, C.; van de Ven, T. G. M. Hairy Cationic Nanocrystalline Cellulose as Retention Additive in Recycled Paper. Cellulose 2019, 26, 6275–6289. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-019-02494-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M.; Yang, S.; Long, L.; Wu, S.; Ding, S. The Enzymatic Deinking of Waste Papers by Engineered Bifunctional Chimeric Neutral Lipase – Endoglucanase. BioResources 2017, 12, 6812–6831. DOI: 10.15376/biores.12.3.6812-6831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gea, S.; Rahayu, S.; Andriayani, A.; Piliang, A. F. R.; Oktari, N. Mechanical and Morphological Characteristic Investigations of Deinked Used Newsprint Paper via Ultra-Sonochemistry Method. J. Nat. 2020, 20, 49–55. DOI: 10.24815/jn.v20i2.16649.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredi, M.; de Oliveira, R. C.; Reyes, R. I. Q.; da Silva, J. C. PAPER PHYSICS: Ultrasonic Treatment of Secondary Fibers to Improve Paper Properties. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2013, 28, 297–301. DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2013-28-02-p297-301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, A.; Singh Chauhan, P. Role of Various Enzymes for Deinking Paper: A Review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 598–612. DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2016.1207594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauchauffé, R.; Lee, S. J.; Han, I.; Kim, S. H.; Moon, S. Y. Improved De-Inking of Inkjet-Printed Paper Using Environmentally Friendly Atmospheric Pressure Low Temperature Plasma for Paper Recycling. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50495-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamoglu, S.; Karademir, A.; Pesman, E.; Aydemir, C.; Atik, C. Effects of Flotation Deinking on the Removal of Main Colors of Oil-Based Inks from Uncoated and Coated Office Papers. BioResources 2013, 8, 45–58. DOI: 10.15376/biores.8.1.45-58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez Casillas, R.; Ramírez Valdovinos, E.; Carrillo Parra, A.; Dávalos Olivares, F.; Navarro Arzate, F. Deinking of Laser Printing with Ultrasound of Intensive Action to Obtain High Purity Cellulose. Rev. Mex. Ciencias For. 2018, 9, 80–101.
   Google Scholar
• Stevulova, N.; Hospodarova, V.; Estokova, A. Study of Thermal Analysis of Selected Cellulose Fibres. Geosci. Eng. 2016, 62, 18–21. DOI: 10.1515/gse-2016-0020.
   Google Scholar
• Lengowski, E. C.; Muñiz, G. I. B. D.; Andrade, A. S. D.; Simon, L. C.; Nisgoski, S. Morphological, Physical and Thermal Characterization of Microfibrillated Cellulose. Rev. Árvore 2018, 42, e420113. DOI: 10.1590/1806-90882018000100013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Wu, S. Changes in Supramolecular Structure and Improvement in Reactivity of Dissolving Pulp via Enzymatic Pretreatment with Processive Endoglucanase EG1 from Volvaria Volvacea. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2020, 40, 163–171. DOI: 10.1080/02773813.2020.1722700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Yue, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Hou, G. Effects of Ultrasonic Wave Pretreatment on the Fibrillation of Cellulose Fiber. Tappi J. 2014, 13, 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar