Difference-Driven Inquiry: A Working Theory of Local Public Deliberation

Works Cited

• Ackerman, John, and David Coogan, eds. The Public Work of Rhetoric: Citizen-Scholars and Public Engagement. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Alinsky, Saul D. Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals. New York: Vintage Books, 1989. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, Robert. “A Discourse Theory of Citizenship.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 90.2 (2004): 189–211. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asen, Robert. “Imagining in the Public Sphere.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 35.4 (2002): 345–67. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Atwill, Janet. Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and the Liberal Arts Tradition. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, Rebecca. “Conflict in Collaborative Decision-Making.” Professional Communication: The Social Perspective. Ed. Nancy Blyler and Charlotte Thralls. Newbury Park: Sage, 1991. 144–62. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Mellon Community Think Tank. Ed. Linda Flower. Carnegie Mellon University. 2012. Web. 18 June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Coogan, David. “Sophists for Social Change.” Ackerman and Coogan 157–74. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, Peter. “Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.2 (2013): 177–201. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, Nathan, and Joseph Gabriel. “The Conduit between Lifeworld and System: Habermas and the Rhetoric of Public Scientific Controversies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40.3 (2010): 201–23. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, Ellen, and Erik Green. “Knowledge Work with the Cherokee Nation: The Pedagogy of Engaging Publics in a Praxis of New Media.” Ackerman and Coogan 175–92. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay Lomax Cook, and Lawrence R. Jacobs. “Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (2004): 315–44. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Athens: Swallow Press, 1927. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham: Duke UP, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2003. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James, and Peter Laslett, eds. Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, Linda. Community Literacy and the Rhetoric of Public Engagement. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2008. 172–87. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, Linda. The Construction of Negotiated Meaning: A Social Cognitive Theory of Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, Linda. “Going Public—In a Disabling Discourse.” Ackerman and Coogan 137–57. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, Linda. “Intercultural Knowledge Building: The Literate Action of a Community Think Tank.” Writing Selves/Writing Societies. Ed. Charles Bazerman and David Russell. Fort Collins: WAC Clearinghouse, 2002. 239–79. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26 (1990): 58–80. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, John, and Peter Levine, eds. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, Eli. “Alinsky’s Reveille: A Community-Organizing Model of Neighborhood-Based Literacy Projects.” College English 67.3 (2005): 274–95. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. T. “Controversy.” Argument in Controversy: Proceedings of the seventh AFA/SCA conference on argumentation. Ed. D. Parsons. Annandale: Speech Communication Association, 1991. 1–13. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, Jeffrey. “On Being Useful: Rhetoric and the Work of Engagement.” Ackerman and Coogan 193–210. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT P, 1996. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. 1962. Trans. Thomas Burger with Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT P, 1989. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, Gerard. Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1999. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, Ronald. Leadership Without Easy Answers. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1994. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jarratt, Susan C. “Prospects for the Public Work of Rhetoric: A Coda on Codes.” Ackerman and Coogan 283–96. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Jarratt, Susan C. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1991. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, Christopher, and Jane Mansbridge. “Disagreement and Consensus: The Need for Dynamic Updating in Public Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation 1.1 (2005): 348–64. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, Jimmie, and Jacqueline Palmer. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and Environmental Politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1992. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Elenore. “Rhetorical Technē, Local Knowledge, and Challenges in Contemporary Activism.” Rhetorics, Literacies, and Narratives of Sustainability. Ed. Peter N. Goggin. New York: Routledge, 2009. 13–38. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Elenore, John Jarvis, and Diane Deerheart Raymond. “The Nipmuck Chaubunagungamaug Do Exist: Imagining the What Next—An Experimental Alternative to Evidentiary Legal Discourse.” Texts of Consequence: Composing Social Activism for the Classroom and Community. Ed. Christopher Wilkey and Nicholas Mauriello. Cresskill: Hampton P, 2012. 317–48. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, Paula, Tactics of Hope: The Public Turn in English Composition. Portsmouth: Boyton/Cook, Heinemann, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, Brian. “Student Loan Fury in the Occupy Movement.” CounterPunch 27 Nov. 2011. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Kathryn, and G. Thomas Goodnight. “Entanglements of Consumption, Cruelty, Privacy and Fashion: The Social Controversy over Fur.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 80 ( August 1994): 246–76. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, Steve. “De-Centering Dewey: A Dialogue. Introduction.” Reflections 9.3 (2011): 5–6. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Kendall. “A Rhetoric of Controversy.” Western Journal of Communication 64.4 (1999): 488–510. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ritivoi, Andreea. Paul Ricoeur: Tradition and Innovation in Rhetorical Theory. Albany: State U of New York P, 2006. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Miller, Patricia. Deliberate Conflict: Argument, Political Theory, and Composition Classes. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Selzer, Jack. “Concord and Controversy on August 28, 1963.” Rhetoric: Concord and Controversy. Ed. Antonio de Vealsco and Melody Lehn. Long Grove: Waveland Press, 2012. 23–38. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Debating Deliberative Democracy. Ed. James Fishkin and Peter Laslett. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. 80–101. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thimsen, Freya. Rev. of Neo-Pragmatism, Communication, and the Culture of Creative Democracy, by Omar Swartz et al. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 42.1 (2012): 90–93. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, Karen. Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Trimbur, John. “Composition and the Circulation of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 52.2 (2000): 188–219. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimbur, John. “Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Learning.” College English 51.6 (1989): 602–16. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, Nancy. “‘We’re Here, and We’re Not Going Anywhere’: Why Working-Class Rhetorical Traditions Still Matter.” College English 73.3 (2011): 221–42. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. “Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication.” Deliberative Democracy: Essays in Reason and Politics. Ed. James Bohman and William Regh. Cambridge: MIT P, 1997. 383–406. Print.
   Google Scholar