Rhetoricity at the End of History: Defining Rhetorical Debility under Neoliberal Colonialism

Works Cited

• Ahmed, Nasim. “It Is Time for the US to End Its Deadly Exchange Programmes with Israel.” Middle East Monitor, 28 May 2020, www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200528-it-is-time-for-the-us-to-end-its-deadly-exchange-programmes-with-israel/ .
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Sara. “Open Forum Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the ‘New Materialism.’” European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2008, pp. 23–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807084854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. “Six Months On: Gaza’s Great March of Return.” Amnesty International, 2018. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2018/10/gaza-great-march-of-return/ .
   Google Scholar
• Balsamo, Mike, and Gillian Flaccus. “On Portland’s Streets: Anger, Fear, and a Fence that Divides.” AP News, Associated P, 27 July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. “The Force of Things: Steps toward an Ecology of Matter.” Political Theory, vol. 32, no. 3, 2004, pp. 347–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703260853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, Lauren. “Slow Death (Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency).” Critical Inquiry, vol. 33, no. 4, 2007, pp. 754–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/521568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, Casey. Rhetoric as a Posthuman Practice. The Ohio State UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• ____. “Writing and Rhetoric And/as Posthuman.” College English, vol. 78, no. 6, 2016, pp. 532–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. “A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities.” Theory, Culture, and Society vol. 36, no. 6, 2018, pp. 31–61 doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkley, Douglas. The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Harper Collins, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. MIT P, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chaput, Catherine. “Neoliberalism and the Rhetorical Invention of Counterpublic Attunement.” Communication and the Public, vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, pp. 176–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047318794688.
   Google Scholar
• Chaput, Catherine, and Joshua S. Hanan. “Rhetorical Hegemony: Transactional Ontologies and the Reinvention of Material Infrastructures.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 52, no. 4, 2019, pp. 339–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.52.4.0339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirindo, Kundai. ”Micronations and Postnational Rhetorics.” Women's Studies in Communication, vol. 41, no. 4, 2018, pp. 383–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1551686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary-Lemon, Jennifer. “Gifts, Ancestors, and Relations: Notes toward an Indigenous New Materialism.” Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture, vol. 30, no. 1, 2019, http://enculturation.net/gifts_ancestors_and_relations .
   Google Scholar
• Conley, Donovan, and Justin Eckstein. “Introduction: Soiled.” Cookery: Food Rhetorics and Social Production, edited by Donovan Conley, et al., The U of Alabama P, 2020, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cudworth, Erika, and Stephen Hobden. The Emancipatory Project of Posthumanism. Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Diane. “Rhetoricity at the End of the World.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 50, no. 4, 2017, pp. 431–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edbauer Rice, Jenny. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 5–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391320.
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, Nirmala. Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• ____. “Disability and the Dialectics of Difference.” Disability & Society, vol. 11, no. 4, 1996, pp. 519–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599627570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. “Race.” Keywords for Disability Studies, edited by Rachel Adams and Benjamin Reiss, NYU P, 2015, pp. 145–48.
   Google Scholar
• Eve, Tuck, and K. Wayne Yang. “Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, Kelly. “Gradations of Debility and Capacity: Biocapitalism and the Neoliberalization of Disability Relations.” Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, 2015, pp. 12–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v4i2.208.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. The Free P, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, Henry. “Reading Hurricane Katrina: Race, Class, and the Biopolitics of Disposability.” College Literature, vol. 33, no. 3, 2006, pp. 171–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2006.0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, Marcial, and Carlos Gallego. Dialectical Imaginaries: Materialist Approaches to U.S. Latino/a Literature in the Age of Neoliberalism. U of Michigan P, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, Rachel. “Disablement in and for Itself: Towards a ‘Global’ Idea of Disability.” Somatechnics, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016, pp. 249–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2016.0194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, Laurie E. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. U State of Utah P, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. “‘A Shocking and Wanton Act’: Israel Accused over Death of Wheelchair User.” 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford U P, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, Peta, and Xin Liu. “The Im/Possibility of Abandonment in New Materialist Ontologies.” Australian Feminist Studies, vol. 30, no. 84, 2015, pp. 128–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1046304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingraham, Chris. “Energy: Rhetoric’s Vitality.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, 2018, pp. 260–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2018.1454188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irni, Sari. “The Politics of Materiality: Affective Encounters in a Transdisciplinary Debate.” European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, 2013, pp. 347–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812472669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Madison. “Sylvan Rhetorics: Roots and Branches of More-than-Human Publics.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 38, no. 1, 2019, pp. 63–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2019.1549408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalin, Jason, and David R. Gruber. “Gut Rhetorics: Toward Experiments in Living with Microbiota.” Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, vol. 1, no. 3–4, 2018, pp. 269–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.5744/rhm.2018.1014.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Talia. ““Winter Storm Left Texas in a ‘Third World Situation’: Ex-Shell Oil President.” Fox Business, 17 Feb. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Jina. “Toward a Crip-of-Color Critique: Thinking with Minich’s ‘Enabling Whom?’” Lateral: Journal of the Cultural Studies Association, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, https://csalateral.org/issue/6-1/forum-alt-humanities-critical-disability-studies-crip-of-color-critique-kim/ .
   Google Scholar
• Kotef, Hagar, and Merav Amir. “Between Imaginary Lines: Violence and Its Justificationsat the Military Checkpoints in Occupied Palestine.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 1, 2011, pp. 55–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410380940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Victoria Ann. “The Theatrical Landscape of Disability.” Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 3, 2004. doi:https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v24i3.511.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, Chris, et al. Kenneth Burke + The Posthuman. The Pennsylvania State UP, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• McGreavy, Bridie. “‘It’s Just a Cycle’: Resilience, Poetics, and Intimate Disruptions.” Poroi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1302.
   Google Scholar
• Meekosha, Helen, and Russell Shuttleworth. “What’s so ‘Critical’ about Critical Disability Studies?” Australian Journal of Human Rights, vol. 15, no. 1, 2009, pp. 47–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861.
   Google Scholar
• Minich, Julie Avril. “Enabling Whom? Critical Disability Studies Now.” Lateral: Journal of the Cultural Studies Association, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.25158/L5.1.9.
   Google Scholar
• Munich Security Conference. “Francis Fukuyama on the End of History | Munich Security Conference 2020.” YouTube, 28 Feb. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Na’puti, Tiara R. “Speaking of Indigeneity: Navigating Genealogies against Erasure and #rhetoricsowhite.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 105, no. 4, 2019, pp. 495–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1669895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nautiyal, Jaishikha. “Becoming a Detour De Force: Dehierarchizing Directionality and Mobility in Rhetorical Research.” Women’s Studies in Communication, vol. 41, no. 4, 2018, pp. 430–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1551983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Malea. “Stories Take Place: A Performance in One Act (2012 Cccc Chair’s Address).” College Composition and Communication, vol. 64, no. 2, 2012, pp. 383–406.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, Jasbir. “Prognosis Time: Towards a Geopolitics of Affect, Debility and Capacity.” Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, vol. 19, no. 2, 2009, pp. 161–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07407700903034147.
   Google Scholar
• ____. The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Duke UP, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, Alison. “Strange Weather: Indigenous Materialisms, New Materialism, and Colonialism.” Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Theory, vol. 5, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 353–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2018.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Jacqueline, and Jonathan Alexander. Techne: Queer Meditations on Writing the Self. Computers and Composition Digital P, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Jenny. “From Architectonic to Tectonics: Introducing Regional Rhetorics.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, 2012, pp. 201–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2012.682831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickert, Thomas. J. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. U of Pittsburgh P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Rachel. “Disabled Palestinian Activist Shot Dead by Israeli Troops in Jerusalem Protest.” The Independent, 16 Dec. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sackey, Donnie Johnson, et al. “Perspectives on Cultural and Posthumanist Rhetorics“ Rhetoric Review, vol. 38, no. 4, 2019, pp. 375–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2019.1654760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalk, Sami. “Critical Disability Studies as Methodology.” Lateral: Journal of the Cultural Studies Association, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, https://csalateral.org/issue/6-1/forum-alt-humanities-critical-disability-studies-methodology-schalk/ .
   Google Scholar
• Siegfried, Kate. “Making Settler Colonialism Concrete: Agentive Materialism and Habitational Violence in Palestine.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, vol. 17, no. 3 , 2020, pp. 267–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1787475.
   Google Scholar
• Stormer, Nathan. “Articulation: A Working Paper on Rhetoric and Taxis.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 90, no. 3, 2004, pp. 257–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0033563042000255516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ____. “Rhetoric’s Diverse Materiality: Polythetic Ontology and Genealogy.” Review of Communication, vol. 16, no. 4, 2016, pp. 299–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2016.1207359.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Nikki. “The Somatechnics of Perception and the Matter of the Non/human: A Critical Response to the New Materialism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 19, no. 3, 2012, pp. 299–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812443477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, Zoe. “An Indigenous Feminist’s Take on the Ontological Turn: ‘Ontology’ Is Just Another Word for Colonialism.” Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 29, no. 1, 2016, pp. 4–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, Kyla Wazana. “On the Limits and Promise of New Materialist Philosophy.” Lateral: Journal of the Cultural Studies Association, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.25158/L5.1.8.
   Google Scholar
• Topaz, Jonathan. “Cleaver: Ferguson Looks like Fallujah.” POLITICO, 19 Aug. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, Victor. “Toward a Political Economy of Rhetoric (or a Rhetoric of Political Economy).” Radical Relevance: Toward a Scholarship of the Whole Left, edited by Laura Gray-Rosendale and Steven Rosendale, State U of New York P, 2005, pp. 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wagers, Kelley. “Race, Nation, and Historical (Re)form in the Souls of Black Folk.” Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, vol. 64, no. 1, 2008, pp. 77–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2008.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Zhaozhe. “Activist Rhetoric in Transnational Cyber-Public Spaces: Toward a Comparative Materialist Approach.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 4, 2020, pp. 240–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2020.1748218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, Justine. “W. E. B. Du Bois and the Conservation of Races: A Piece of Ecological Ancestry.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 4, 2019, pp. 342–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2019.1634830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhoit, Elizabeth. D. “Affordances as Material Communication: How the Spatial Environment Communicates to Organize Cyclists in Copenhagen, Denmark.” Western Journal of Communication, vol. 82, no. 2, 2017, pp. 217–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1306098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock, Joseph. A. “Politics, Ideology and Hegemony in Gramsci’s Theory.” Social and Economic Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, 1985, pp. 199–210.
   Google Scholar
• Yergeau, Remi. Authoring Autism: On Rhetoric and Neurological Queerness. Duke UP, 2017.
   Google Scholar