Vaccination Double Bind: A Study of Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making

Works Cited

• Alexander, Jamal-Jared, and Avery C. Edenfield. “Health and Wellness as Resistance: Tactical Folk Medicine.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, 2021, pp. 241–56. doi:10.1080/10572252.2021.1930181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduser, Lora. Living Chronic: Agency and Expertise in the Rhetoric of Diabetes. The Ohio State UP, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Beemer, Cristy. “From the Margins of Healthcare: Demythicizing Cancer Online.” Peitho, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 93–127.
   Google Scholar
• Bivens, Kristin. “Rhetorically Listening for Microwithdrawals of Consent in Research Practice.” Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, edited by Lisa Meloncon and J. Blake Scott, Routledge, 2018, pp. 138–56.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, Elizabeth. Conceiving Normalcy: Rhetoric, Law, and the Double Binds of Infertility. U of Alabama P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cagle, Lauren E. “The Ethics of Researching Unethical Images: A Story of Trying to Do Good Research without Doing Bad Things.” Computers and Composition, vol. 61, 2021, pp. 102651. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461521000281. Accessed 22 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Campeau, Kari L. “Vaccine Barriers, Vaccine Refusals: Situated Vaccine Decision-Making in the Wake of the 2017 Minnesota Measles Outbreak.” Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, 2019, pp. 176–207. doi:10.5744/rhm.2019.1007.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. “COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States.” Covid Data Tracker, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-total-admin-rate-total. Accessed 22 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Adele E., et al. “Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine.” American Sociological Review, vol. 68, no. 2, 2003, pp. 161–94. doi:10.2307/1519765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hertogh, Lori B. “Feminist Digital Research Methodology for Rhetoricians of Health and Medicine.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 32, no. 4, 2018, pp. 480–503. doi:10.1177/1050651918780188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hertogh, Lori B. “Reinscribing a New Normal: Pregnancy, Disability, and Health 2.0.” Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, & Technology, vol. 7, 2015, https://adanewmedia.org/2015/04/reinscribing-a-new-normal-pregnancy-disability-and-health-2-0-in-the-online-natural-birthing-community-birth-without-fear/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Derkatch, Colleen. “The Self-Generating Language of Wellness and Natural Health.” Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018, pp. 132–60. doi:10.5744/rhm.2018.1009.
   Google Scholar
• Edenfield, Avery C., et al. “Queering Tactical Technical Communication: DIY HRT.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, 2019, pp. 177–91. doi:10.1080/10572252.2019.1607906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, Lenny, et al. “Vaccination Persuasion Online: A Qualitative Study of Two Provaccine and Two Vaccine-skeptical Websites.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 17, no. 5, 2015, pp. E133. doi:10.2196/jmir.4153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, Bernice L. Anti/Vax: Reframing the Vaccination Controversy. Cornell UP, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, Bernice L. “Immunity, Modernity, and the Biopolitics of Vaccination Resistance.” Configurations, vol. 25, no. 3, 2017, pp. 279–300. doi:10.1353/con.2017.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, Bernice L. Mother’s Milk: Breastfeeding Controversies in American Culture. Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, Bernice L., et al. “H1N1 Vaccination and Health Beliefs in a Rural Community in the Southeastern United States: Lessons Learned.” Critical Public Health, vol. 30, no. 2, 2020, pp. 245–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, Sharon. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. Yale UP, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hinson, Katrina. “Framing Illness through Facebook Enabled Online Support Groups.” Communication Design Quarterly Review, vol. 4, no. 2b, 2017, pp. 22–31. doi:10.1145/3068755.3068758.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson-West, Pru. “Understanding Vaccination Resistence: Moving Beyond Risk.” Health, Risk & Society, vol. 5, no. 3, 2003, pp. 273–83. doi:10.1080/13698570310001606978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holladay, Drew. “Classified Conversations: Psychiatry and Tactical Technical Communication in Online Spaces.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 1, 2017, pp. 8–24. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1257744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, Jordynn. “Leviathan and the Breast Pump: Toward an Embodied Rhetoric ofWearable Technology.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 46, no. 3, 2016, pp. 207–21. doi:10.1080/02773945.2016.1171691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, Anna. “Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, And the Postmodern Paradigm – An Overview of Tactics and Tropes Used Online by the Anti-Vaccination Movement.” Vaccine, vol. 30, no. 25, 2012, pp. 3778–89. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, Anna. “A Postmodern Pandora’s Box: Anti-Vaccination Misinformation on the Internet.” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 7, 2010, pp. 1709–16. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, Amy. Breast of Bottle?: Contemporary Controversies in Infant Feeding Policy and Practice. U of South Carolina P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski, Lauren. “Beyond the “Hullabaloo” of the Vaccine “Debate”:understanding Parents’ Assessment of Risks When Making Vaccine Decisions.” Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, pp. 63–92. doi:10.5744/rhm.2020.1003.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski, Lauren. “Harms of Hedging in Scientific Discourse: Andrew Wakefield and the Origins of the Autism Vaccine Controversy.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 3, 2014, pp. 165–83. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.816487.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Heidi Y. Vaccine Rhetorics. The Ohio State UP, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Heidi Y, et al. “Reframing Medicine’s Publics: The Local as a Public of Vaccine Refusal.” The Journal of Medical Humanities, vol. 35, no. 2, 2014, pp. 111–29. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9278-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lay, Mary M. The Rhetoric of Midwifery: Gender, Knowledge, and Power. Rutgers UP, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, Adam S. “Medical Narratives in Rhetorical Context: Ethically Researching Anti-Vaccinationists.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 1, 2018, pp. 80–92. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1399750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandavilli, Apoorva, and Roni Caryn Rabin. “Pregnant Women Get Conflicting Advice on COVID-19 Vaccines. New York Times, 28 Jan. 2021, nytimes.com/2021/01/28/health/pregnant-women-covid-vaccines.html. Accessed 22 Feb. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• McCaughey, Jessica. “The Rhetoric of Online Exclusive Pumping Communities: Tactical Technical Communication as Eschewing Judgment.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, 2021, pp. 34–47. doi:10.1080/10572252.2020.1823485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley, Marissa. “Analyzing PCOS Discourses: Strategies for Unpacking Chronic Illness and Taking Action.” Women’s Health Advocacy: Rhetorical Ingenuity for the twenty-first Century, edited by Jamie White-Farnham, et al., Routledge, 2020, pp. 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Sara E., et al. “The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recommendation for Use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine—United States, December 2020.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 69, no. 51/52, 1 Jan. 2021, pp. 1653–56. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm695152e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, Sara E. “The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recommendation for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine—United States, December 2020.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 69, no. 50, 18 Dec. 2020, pp. 1922–24. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6950e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opel, Dawn. “Ethical Research in “Health 2.0.”: Considerations for Scholars of Medical Rhetoric.” Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health & Medicine, edited by Lisa Meloncon and J. Blake Scott, Routledge, 2018, pp. 176–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pengilly, Cynthia. “Rhetorics of Empowerment for Managing Lupus Pain: Patient-to-Patient Knowledge Sharing in Online Health Forums.” Women’s Health Advocacy: Rhetorical Ingenuity for the twenty-first Century, edited by Jamie White-Farnham, et al., Routledge, 2020, pp. 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Jennifer A. Calling the Shots: Why Parents Reject Vaccines. NYU P, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Jennifer A. “Neoliberal Mothering and Vaccine Refusal: Imagined Gated Communities and the Privilege of Choice.” Gender & Society, vol. 28, no. 5, 2014, pp. 679–704. doi:10.1177/0891243214532711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, Jennifer A. “We are Fierce, Independent Thinkers and Intelligent’: Social Capital and Stigma Management among Mothers Who Refuse Vaccines.” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 257, 2020, pp. 112015–19. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Jennifer B. “Boundary Work and the Construction of Scientific Authority in the Vaccines-Autism Controversy.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 46, no. 1, 2016, pp. 59–82. doi:10.1177/0047281615600638.
   Google Scholar
• Seigel, Marika. The Rhetoric of Pregnancy. U of Chicago P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shimabukuro, Tom T., et al. “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 384, no. 24, 2021, pp. 2273–82. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2104983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teston, Christa. Bodies in Flux. U of Chicago P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tomes, Nancy. Remaking the American Patient: How Madison Avenue and Modern Medicine Turned Patients into Consumers. The U of North Carolina P, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Kenny, and Lynda Walsh. “No One yet Knows What the Ultimate Consequences May Be: How Rachel Carson Transformed Scientific Uncertainty into a Site for Public Participation in Silent Spring.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 26, no. 1, 2012, pp. 3–34. doi:10.1177/1050651911421122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam, Shui-yin S. “Visualizing Birth Stories from the Margin: Toward a Reproductive Justice Model of Rhetorical Analysis.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 1, 2020, pp. 19–34. doi:10.1080/02773945.2019.1682182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambrano, Laura D., et al. “Update: Characteristics of Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status—United States, January 22-October 3, 2020.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 69, no. 44, 2020, pp. 1641–47. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6944e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar