Intimacies of the Common: Enclosure, Solidarity, and the Possibilities of Critical Publicity under Capitalism

Works Cited

• Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Duke UP, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, Robert. “Introduction: Neoliberalism and the Public Sphere.” Communication and the Public, vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, pp. 171–75. doi:10.1177/2057047318794687.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, Robert. “Neoliberalism, the Public Sphere, and a Public Good.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 103, no. 4, 2017, pp. 329–49. doi:10.1080/00335630.2017.1360507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, Lauren. “Intimacy: A Special Issue.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2, 1998, pp. 281–88. doi:10.1086/448875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, Lauren. “‘Lauren Berlant on Intimacy as World-Making.’ Interview by Hans Demeyer.” Extra Extra, no. 16, July 2022, https://extraextramagazine.com/talk/lauren-berlant-on-intimacy-as-world-making/. Accessed 17 Feb. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, Lauren. On the Inconvenience of Other People. Duke UP, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, Lauren, and Warner Michael. “Sex in Public.” Publics and Counterpublics, edited by Michael Warner, MIT P, 2005, pp. 187–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bost, Matthew W., and Joshua S. Hanan. “Capacitating the Deep Commons: Considering Capital and Commoning Practices from an Affective-Rhetorical Systems Perspective.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 2, 2023, pp. 186–201. doi:10.1080/02773945.2022.2129751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, Casey. “Pervasive Citizenship through #sensecommons.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 46, no. 3, 2016, pp. 269–83. doi:10.1080/02773945.2016.1171695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, Caitlin, and Elise Homan. “Crossing Borders, Building Solidarity: Affective Labor in Shaping Coalitional Murals.” Women’s Studies in Communication, vol. 41, no. 3, 2018, pp. 224–45. doi:10.1080/07491409.2018.1502224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catherine, Chaput, and Joshua S. Hanan. “WikiLeaks and Its Production of the Common: An Exploration of Rhetorical Agency in the Neoliberal Era.” What Democracy Looks Like, edited by Christina R. Foust, et al., U of Alabama P, 2017, pp. 246–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chaput, Catherine. “Neoliberalism and the Rhetorical Invention of Counterpublic Attunement.” Communication and the Public, vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, pp. 176–89. doi:10.1177/205704731879468.
   Google Scholar
• Chaput, Catherine. “Rhetorical Circulation in Late Capitalism: Neoliberalism and the Overdetermination of Affective Energy.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 43, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1–25. doi:10.1353/par.0.0047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávez, Karma R. Queer Migration Politics. U of Illinois P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cintron, Ralph. Democracy as Fetish. Penn State UP, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, Josue David. “Affect, Emotion and Immigration Rhetoric, or What Happens When a Minuteman Moves in with Undocumented Immigrants.” The Rhetorics of US Immigration: Identity, Community and Otherness, edited by E. Johanna Hartelius, Penn State UP, 2015, pp. 247–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Melinda. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. MIT P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, Glen Sean. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. U of Minnesota P, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa, Mariarosa, and Selma James. The Power of Women and the Subversion of Community. Falling Wall P, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Diane. “Rhetoricity, Temporality, Democratic Nonequivalence.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 3, 2021, pp. 193–203. doi:10.1080/02773945.2021.1918506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, Jodi. “Enjoying Neoliberalism.” Cultural Politics, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 47–72. doi:10.2752/175174308X266398.
   Google Scholar
• De Angelis, Massimo. Omnia Sunt Communia: On the Commons and the Transition to Post-capitalism. Zed Books, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dubriwny, Tasha. “Consciousness-Raising as Collective Rhetoric: The Articulation of Experience in the Redstockings Abortion Speak-out of 1969.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 91, no. 4, 2005, pp. 395–422. doi:10.1080/00335630500488275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edbauer, Jennifer. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 5–24. doi:10.1080/02773940509391320.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, Silvia. Caliban and the Witch. Autonomedia, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, Silvia. Re-enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. PM P, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Foust, Christina R., et al. eds. What Democracy Looks Like: The Rhetoric of Social Movements and Counterpublics. U of Alabama P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. Cannibal Capitalism: How Our System is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet–And What We Can Do about it. Verso Books, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Garza, Alicia. The Purpose of Power: How We Come Together When We Fall Apart. Penguin Random House, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Deborah. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s Fight against AIDS. U of Chicago P, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Ronald Walter. “Rhetoric and Capitalism: Rhetorical Agency as Communicative Labor.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 37, no. 3, 2004, pp. 188–206. doi:10.1353/par.2004.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, Laurie. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. UP of Colorado, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT P, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hallsby, Atilla. “Intimate Spaces of Mental Wellness.” Rhetoric, Politics & Culture, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021, pp. 55–66. Project MUSE, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/801951.
   Google Scholar
• Hanan, Joshua S. “Home Is Where the Capital Is: The Culture of Real Estate in an Era of Control Societies.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 2010, pp. 176–201. doi:10.1080/14791421003759166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartelius, E. Johanna. The Gifting Logos: Expertise in the Digital Commons. U of California P, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, Gerard A. Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres. U of South Carolina P, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Jenell. “‘A Man’s Mouth Is His Castle’: The Midcentury Fluoridation Controversy and the Visceral Public.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 102, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1–20. doi:10.1080/00335630.2015.1135506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, Peter. Stop, Thief! the Commons, Enclosures and Resistance. PM P, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, Lisa. The Intimacies of Four Continents. Duke UP, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, Christian. Lacan in Public: Psychoanalysis and the Science of Rhetoric. U of Alabama P, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, Ashley Noel, and Bryan J. McCann. “‘Strictly an Act of Street Violence’: Intimate Publicity and Affective Divestment in the New Orleans Mother’s Day Shooting.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, vol. 14, no. 4, 2017, pp. 334–50. doi:10.1080/14791420.2017.1366661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, Ashley Noel, and Tiara R. Na’puti. “Publicity as Containment.” Rhetoric, Politics & Culture, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021, pp. 97–105. Project MUSE muse.jhu.edu/article/801955. doi:10.1353/rhp.2021.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. Capital. Translated by Ben Fowkes, vol. 1, Penguin, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• McAlevey, Jane. No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age. Oxford UP, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Robert Olen. “Metastasis and Retroactive Causality in Incentive Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 104, no. 4, 2018, pp. 400–21. doi:10.1080/00335630.2018.1519257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter D. “Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-Coloniality.” Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 2–3, 2007, pp. 449–514. doi:10.1080/09502380601162647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister, Damien Smith, and Misti Yang. “Five Theses on Technoliberalism and the Networked Public Sphere.” Communication and the Public, vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, pp. 247–62. doi:10.1177/2057047318794963.
   Google Scholar
• Rand, Erin J. Reclaiming Queer: Activist and Academic Rhetorics of Resistance. U of Alabama P, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, Asen, and Daniel C. Brouwer eds. Counterpublics and the State. State U of New York P, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, Aimee Carillo. Power Lines: On the Subject of Feminist Alliances. Duke UP, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Siegfried, Kate. “Cramped Space: Finding Rebellious Potential in the Attica Prison Uprising of 1971.” Cultural Critique, vol. 120, no. 1, 2023, pp. 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Sloop, John M., and Charles E. Morris. “‘What Lips These Lips Have Kissed’: Refiguring the Politics of Queer Public Kissing.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 2006, pp. 188–206. doi:10.1080/14791420500505585.
   Google Scholar
• Spade, Dean. Mutual Aid. Verso, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tallbear, Kim. “Making Love and Relations beyond Settler Sex and Family.” Making Kin, Not Populations, edited by Adele E. Clark and Donna Haraway, Prickly Paradigm P, 2018, pp. 145–64.
   Google Scholar
• Verbuč, David. “Notions of Intimate Publicness and the American Do-It-Yourself Music Spaces.” Communication and the Public, vol. 2, no. 4, 2017, pp. 284–304. doi:10.1177/2057047317741901.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer-Serrano, Darrel. The New York Young Lords and the Struggle for Liberation. Temple UP, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. MIT P, 2005.
   Google Scholar