The structure and function of academic self‐concept in gifted and general education students

References

• Ames , C. A. 1990 . Motivation: What teachers need to know . Teachers College Record , 91 : 409 – 421 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura , A. 1977 . Self‐efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change . Psychological Review , 84 : 191 – 215 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura , A. 1986 . Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory , Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice‐Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Bentler , P. and Wu , E. J. C. 1995 . EQS 5 user's guide [computer software] , Encino , CA : Multivariate Software .
   Google Scholar
• Byrne , B. M. 1996 . Measuring self‐concept across the lifespan: Issues and instrumentation , Washington, DC : American Psychological Association .
   Google Scholar
• Hattie , J. 1992 . Self‐concept , Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Hoge , R. D. and Renzulli , J. S. 1993 . Exploring the link between giftedness and self‐concept . Review of Educational Research , 63 : 449 – 465 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1995 . “ Evaluating model fit ” . In Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications , Edited by: Hoyle , R. H. 76 – 99 . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1998 . Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to unparameterized model misspecification . Psychological Methods , 3 : 424 – 453 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1999 . Cut‐off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Structural Equation Modeling , 6 (1) : 1 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline , R. B. 1998 . Principles and practices of structural equation modeling , New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lyon , M. A. 1993 . Academic self‐concept and its relationship to achievement in a sample of junior high school students . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 53 : 201 – 211 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. 1986 . Verbal and math self‐concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model . American Educational Research Journal , 23 : 129 – 149 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. 1987 . The big‐fish‐little‐pond effect on academic self‐concept . Journal of Educational Psychology , 79 : 280 – 295 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. 1990 . Causal ordering of academic self‐concept and academic achievement: A multiwave longitudinal panel analysis . Journal of Educational Psychology , 82 : 646 – 656 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. , Chessor , D. , Craven , R. and Roche , L. 1995 . The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self‐concept: The big fish strikes again . American Educational Research Journal , 32 : 285 – 319 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. , Koller , O. and Baumert , J. 2001 . Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the Big‐Fish‐Little‐Pond Effect on academic self‐concept . American Educational Research Journal , 28 : 321 – 350 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. and Yeung , A. S. 1997 . Causal effects of academic self‐concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data . Journal of Educational Psychology , 89 : 41 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach , D. B. 2000 . “ The School Attitude Assessment Survey‐ ” . Revised. Unpublished instrument
   Google Scholar
• McCoach , D. B. and Siegle , D. 2001 . A comparison of high achievers’ and low achievers’ attitudes, perceptions, and motivations . Academic Exchange Quarterly , 5 (2) : 71 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• McCoach , D. B. and Siegle , D. in press . Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high achieving gifted students . Gifted Child Quarterly ,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach , D. B. and Siegle , D. in press . The SAAS‐R: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve . Educational and Psychological Measurement ,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mui , F. L. L. , Yeung , A. S. , Low , R. and Jin , P. 2000 . Academic self‐concept of talented students: Factor structure and applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model . Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 23 : 343 – 367 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker , J. A. and Stocking , V. B. 2001 . Looking outside and inside: Self‐concept development of gifted adolescents . Exceptional Children , 67 : 535 – 548 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyryt , M. C. and Mendaglio , S. 1994 . The multidimensional self‐concept: A comparison of gifted and average ability adolescents . Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 17 : 299 – 305 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov , T. and Marcoulides , G. A. 2000 . A first course in structural equation modeling , Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Schunk , D. H. 1981 . Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self‐efficacy analysis . Journal of Educational Psychology , 73 : 93 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk , D. H. 1984 . Self‐efficacy perspective on achievement behavior . Educational Psychologist , 19 : 48 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield , A. and Karpathian , M. 1991 . Who am I and what can I do? Children's self‐concepts and motivation in achievement situations . Educational Psychologist , 26 : 233 – 262 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar