46
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
From the Editor’s Desk

From the Editor’s Desk

, PhD

REFERENCES

  • Ambrose, D. (2006). Large-scale contextual influences on creativity: Evolving academic disciplines and global value systems. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 75–85. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_9
  • Ambrose, D. (2009). Expanding visions of creative intelligence: An interdisciplinary exploration. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Ambrose, D. (2012). Revealing additional dimensions of globalization and cultural hegemony: A response to Roland Persson’s call for cultural sensitivity in gifted studies. Gifted and Talented International, 27, 99–110.
  • Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 16–29. doi:10.1002/jocb.002
  • Baer, J. (in press). Domain specificity in creativity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
  • Briggs, J. (1988). Fire in the crucible. Los Angeles, CA: Tarcher.
  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. The Washington Quarterly, 23, 215–228. doi:10.1162/016366000560665
  • Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (in press). The role of domains in the conceptualization of talent. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Creative intelligence in the 21st century: Grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
  • Piechowski, M. M. (2014). Rethinking Dąbrowski’s theory: I. The case against primary integration. Roeper Review, 36, 11–17. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.856829
  • Subotnik, R., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.