Understanding Gender Differences in Thinking Styles of Gifted Children

REFERENCES

• Anderson, C. M. (2005). Ways of knowing: Their association with gender and higher order thinking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10057/741
   Google Scholar
• Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, M., Harris, B., Garrison-Wade, D., & Leech, N. (2011). Gifted girls: Gender bias in gifted referrals. Roeper Review, 33, 170–181. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.580500
   Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105–124). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, C. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 52–70. doi:10.1177/1932202X12472602
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1997). Psychometrics, intelligence, and public perception. Intelligence, 24, 25–52. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90012-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarenbach, J., & Eckert, R. D. (2013). Policy-related definitions of giftedness: A call for change. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 26–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clinchy, B. M. (1989). The development of thoughtfulness in college women: Integrating reason and care. American Behavioral Scientists, 32, 647–657. doi:10.1177/0002764289032006005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinchy, B. M. (1990). Issues of gender in teaching and learning. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Clinchy, B. M. (1995). Narratives of mind, gender, and the life course (Commentary). Human Development, 38, 258–264. doi:10.1159/000278326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinchy, B. M. (1996). Connected and separate knowing: Toward a marriage of two minds. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing (pp. 205–245). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clinchy, B. M. (2002). Revisiting women’s ways of knowing. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 63–87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y., & Feldhussen, J. F. (1999). A validation study of the thinking styles inventory: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 21, 302–307. doi:10.1080/02783199909553981
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–201. doi:10.1111/josi.1990.46.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98–119). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 61–80). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 5–12. doi:10.1177/001698620004400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galotti, K. M., Clinchy, B. M., Ainsworth, K. H., Lavin, B., & Mansfield, A. F. (1999). A new way of assessing ways of knowing: The Attitudes Toward Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS). Sex Roles, 40, 745–766. doi:10.1023/A:1018860702422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galotti, K. M., Drebus, D. W., & Reimar, R. L. (2001). Ways of knowing as learning styles: Learning MAGIC with a partner. Sex Roles, 44, 419–436. doi:10.1023/A:1011978011991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guild, P., & Garger, S. (1997). Marching to different drummers. Jerusalem, Israel: Branco Weiss Institute and Israel Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport, Curriculum Department.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200–210. doi:10.1177/001698629604000405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817–824. doi:10.1038/nrn3817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, K. H., Elfenbein, M. H., Copozzi, L., Eason, H. A., Bernardo, M. F., & Ferus, K. S. (2000). Relationship of connected and separate knowing to parental style and birth order. Sex Roles, 43, 229–240. doi:10.1023/A:1007080914728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, K. H., Elfenbein, M. H., & Martin, M. B. (1997). Relationship of connected and separate knowing to the learning styles of Kolb, formal reasoning, and intelligence. Sex Roles, 37, 401–414. doi:10.1023/A:1025605523940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, K. H., Elfenbein, M. H., & Messina, J. A. (1995). A preliminary scale to measure connected and separate knowing: The Knowing Styles Inventory. Sex Roles, 33, 499–513. doi:10.1007/BF01544676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experimental learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Evans, C., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2014). Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition: A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 3–33. doi:10.1177/1529100614525555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luscombe, A., & Riley, T. L. (2001). An examination of self-concept in academically gifted adolescents: Do gender differences occur? Roeper Review, 24, 20–22. doi:10.1080/02783190109554120
   Google Scholar
• Maitra, K., & Kumari, H. (1996). Gender differences in the perceptions of choice of subjects pertaining to science. Gifted Education International, 11(2), 86–90. doi:10.1177/026142949601100204
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, A., & Clinchy, B. (1992, May). The influence of different kinds of relationships on the development and expression of “separate” and “connected” knowing in undergraduate women. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Symposium of the Jean Piaget Society: Development and Vulnerability in Close Relationships, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• McClain, M. C., & Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 59–88. doi:10.1080/15377903.2012.643757
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. H. (2000). The development of interconnected thinking. In P. H. Miller & E. K. Scholnick (Eds.), Toward a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 45–59). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Peyser, M. (2005). Identifying and nurturing gifted children in Israel. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 27(2), 229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddick, S. (1996). Reason’s “femininity”: A case for connected knowing. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’ s ways of knowing (pp. 248–273). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. K., & David, B. (2001, July). Moral reasoning: Gender, the self and social context. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the Society of Australian Social Psychologists, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. K., & David, B. (2003). Gender differences in ways of knowing: The context dependence of the attitudes toward thinking and learning survey. Sex Roles, 49, 693–699. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000003342.16137.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2006). Ways of knowing and epistemological beliefs: Combined effect on academic performance. Educational Psychology, 26, 411–423. doi:10.1080/01443410500341304
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. K. (1994). Reclaiming lost giftedness in girls. Gifted, 85, 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, C. H. (2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. Delran, NJ: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Staberg, E.-M. (1994). Gender and science in the Swedish compulsory school. Gender and Education, 6, 35–46. doi:10.1080/0954025940060103
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, H., Duit, R., & Benke, G. (2000). Do boys and girls understand physics differently? Physics Education, 35, 417–422. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/35/6/307
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, A. (1996). Reconfiguring teaching and knowing in the college classroom. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing (pp. 25–26). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1993). Thinking styles and the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 122–130. doi:10.1080/02783199309553555
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in school. European Journal for High Ability, 6, 201–219. doi:10.1080/0937445940060211
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700–712. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiiatek, M. A., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2000). Gender differences in academic attitudes among gifted elementary school students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 360–377. doi:10.1177/016235320002300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teacher’s beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 144–151. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, K. (2009). Learning styles as self-fulfilling prophecies. In R. A. R. Gurung & L. Prieto (Eds.), Getting culture: Incorporating diversity across the curriculum (pp. 53–63). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 266–271. doi:10.1177/0098628315589505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.-F. (1999). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 165–181. doi:10.1080/00223989909599731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Thinking styles across cultures: Their relationships with student learning. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 197–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. (2006). Connected knowledge in science and mathematics education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1579–1599. doi:10.1080/09500690500439199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2002). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 245–268. doi:10.1080/09500690210126766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar