Artistic Ways of Knowing in Gifted Education: Encouraging Every Student to Think Like an Artist

REFERENCES

• Abeel, L., Callahan, C., & Hunsaker, S. (1994). The use of published instruments in the identification of gifted students. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
   Google Scholar
• Albee, E. (1988). It is the dark we have to fear. New York, NY: American Council for the Arts Books.
   Google Scholar
• American Institutes for Research. (2016). Wolf Trap’s early STEM/arts program translates into one to two months of additional math learning, AIR study finds. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/news/press-release/wolf-trap-s-early-stem-arts-program-translates-one-two-months-additional-math
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts Education Partnership. (2014). A snapshot of state policies for arts education. Retrieved from http://www.aep-arts.com
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, B., & Harris, K. (1983). Encouraging the aesthetic impulse in young gifted children. Roeper Review, 5, 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Belingit, M. (2016, February 22). Teachers are using theater and dance to teach math—And it’s working. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/teachers-are-using-theater-and-dance-to-teach-math–and-its-working/2016/02/22/61f8dc0c-d68b-11e5-b195-2e29a4e13425_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, E. (Ed.). (1989). Dimensions of musical thinking. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (1983). Growing up gifted. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (1984). Educating artistically talented students. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (1992). Issues and practices related to identification of gifted and talented students in the visual arts. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, T. (1992). On musical experience. In B. Reimer & J. Wright (Eds.), On the nature of musical experience (pp. 51–60). Niwot: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. (Ed.). (1991). Developing minds: A resource for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervisor and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Giomi, E. (1999). The effects of three years of piano instruction on children’s cognitive development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 198–212. doi:10.2307/3345779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courey, S. J., Balogh, E., Siker, J. R., & Paik, J. (2012). Academic music: Music instruction to engage third-grade students in learning basic fraction concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 251–278. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9395-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, R. (1990). Drama and intelligence: A cognitive theory. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill–Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. (1986). Creativity is forever. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (1989). Education of the gifted and talented. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, S. (2009, June 15). Study finds instruction in art lags in 8th grade. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/education/16scores.html
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, E. (2010, April 9). Well-rounded education a necessity, not a luxury. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2010/04/heres_something_you_probably_d.html
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1972). Educating artistic vision. New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1986). Appreciating children’s aesthetic ways of knowing: An interview with Elliot Eisner by T. Buescher. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 7–15. doi:10.1177/016235328601000102
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. J. (2006). Music education and assessment: Issues and suggestions. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment in arts education (pp. 41–56). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65–80). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. (2004). No Child Left Behind and gifted education. Roeper Review, 26, 121–123. doi:10.1080/02783190409554255
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1994). The arts and human development. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 200–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. (1992). Toward a place in the curriculum for the arts. In B. Reimer & R. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education and aesthetic knowing: Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part III; pp. 192–212). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E. (1987). The nature, description, measurement, and evaluation of music aptitudes. Chicago, IL: GIA.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (1994). The academics of artistic thinking. Think, 5(2), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (1995a). The assessment of potential talent in musical behavior/performance: Criteria and procedures to consider in the identification of musically gifted and talented students ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlotte.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (1995b). Talent identification and development in the arts: An artistic/educational dialogue. Roeper Review, 18, 112–117. doi:10.1080/02783199509553710
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (2000). Delights and dilemmas of the musically talented teenager. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (2002a, November). How Mozart really makes you smarter. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (2002b). Kindling the spark: Recognizing and developing musical talent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (2003). Musical talent: Nurturing potential and guiding development. In P. Olszewski-Kubilius, L. Limburg-Weber, & S. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Early gifts: Recognizing and nurturing childrens’ talents (pp. 83–102). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (2013). Musician’s performance portfolio: A process for musical self-assessment. San Diego, CA: Neil A. Kjos Music.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (2014). Arts talent ID: A framework for the identification of talented students in the arts. Unionville, NY: Royal Fireworks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutounian, J. (2015). Artistic ways of knowing: How to think like an artist. Unionville, NY: Royal Fireworks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. A. (2007). Differences in mathematics scores between students who receive traditional Montessori instruction and students who receive music enriched Montessori instruction. Journal for Learning Through the Arts, 3(1), 1–50. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/07h5f866
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B., Soep, E., & Roach, A. (1998). Living the arts through language-learning: A report on community-based youth organizations. American for the Arts Monographs, 2(7), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/pdf/get_involved/advocacy/research/2011/MonographNov1998.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L. (2000a). Learning to make music enhances spatial reasoning. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 179–238. doi:10.2307/3333643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland, L. (2000b). Listening to music enhances spatial–temporal reasoning: Evidence for the “Mozart effect.” Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hom, E. J. (2014). What is STEM education? Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/43296-what-is-stem-education.html
   Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, A., & Day, M. (2007). Children and their art (8th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlick, L. (1990). Conduit or cage? Mover or museum? The future of performance in dance education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 60(5), 53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, D. W., & Forsythe, J. L. (2005). The effects of the arts IMPACT curriculum upon student performance on the Ohio fourth grade proficiency test. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 164, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Korn, R. (2010). Educational research: The art of problem solving. New York, NY: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum Visitor Studies, Evaluation and Audience Research.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. (2000). An investigation of an arts infusion program on creative thinking, academic achievement, affective functioning, and arts appreciation of children at three grade levels. Studies in Art Education, 41, 208–227. doi:10.2307/1320378
   Google Scholar
• Mahlmann, J. J. (1994). National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• McCaslin, N. (1984). Creative drama in the classroom. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, B. P. (2006). Teaching dance as art in education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moga, E., Burger, K., Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2000). Does studying the arts engender creative thinking? Evidence for near but not far transfer. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 91–104. doi:10.2307/3333639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomerie, D., & Ferguson, J. (1999). Bears don’t need phonics: An examination of the role of drama in laying the foundations for critical thinking in the reading process. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 4, 11–20. doi:10.1080/1356978990040102
   Google Scholar
• Nadel, M. H., & Miller, C. (Eds.). (1978). The dance experience: Readings in dance appreciation. New York, NY: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress, National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The nation’s report card 2009: Arts 2008 (U.S. Department of Education Publication NCES No. 2009488). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. (2014). National core arts standards. Retrieved from http://www.nationalartsstandards.org
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1990). The nature and nurture of creativity. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 415–441). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Piirto, J. (1992). Those who create. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piirto, J. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. New York, NY: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Podlozny, A. (2000). Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: A clear link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3–4), 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin, N., & Hedberg, E. C. (2011). Arts education in America: What the declines mean for arts participation. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/2008-SPPA-ArtsLearning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin, N., & Redmond, R. (2004). Putting the arts in the picture: Reframing education in the 21st century. Chicago, IL: Columbia College.
   Google Scholar
• Rauscher, F. H., & Shaw, G. (1998). Key components of the Mozart effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 835–841. doi:10.2466/pms.1998.86.3.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G., & Ky, K. (1995). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611. doi:10.1038/365611a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, B. (1970). Philosophy of music education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, B. (1992). What knowledge is of most worth in the arts? In B. Reimer & R. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing: Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 20–50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (1992). The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing: Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., & Wright, J. ( Eds). (1992). On the nature of musical experience. Niwot, CO: University of Colorado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renshaw, P. (1992). Talented young musicians and the Yehudi Menuhin school. Gifted Education International, 1, 22–25. doi:10.1177/026142948200100106
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. R., & Reis, S. M. (1991). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for the development of creative productivity. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 111–114). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, C. (1990). Measuring musical giftedness. Music Educators Journal, 76(7), 40–49. doi:10.2307/3401036
   Google Scholar
• Richert, E. S. (1991). Rampant problems and promising practices in identification. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 81–96). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Richert, E. S., Alvino, L., & McDonnel, R. (1982). The national report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth. Sewell, NJ: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Saraniero, P. (2016). Growing from STEM to STEAM: Tips to team up the arts and sciences in your classroom. Retrieved from https://artsedge.kennedy-center.org/educators/how-to/growing-from-stem-to-steam
   Google Scholar
• Seashore, C. (1938). Psychology of music. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sloboda, J. (1985). The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloboda, J. (2005). Exploring the musical mind: Cognition, emotion, ability, function. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (Ed.). (2000). The Journal of Aesthetic Education: Special Issue: The arts and academic achievement: What evidence shows, 34 (3–4).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A. (2004). Policy and arts education. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 87–91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smithrim, K., & Upitis, R. (2005). Learning through the arts: Lessons of engagement. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne De L’éducation, 28, 109–127. doi:10.2307/1602156
   Google Scholar
• Spolin, V. (1985). Theater games for rehearsal: A director’s handbook. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamer, M. (2009, June). On the chopping block, again. Harvard Ed. Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/ed/09/06/chopping-block-again
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, A. (1991). Social psychology of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education ( pp. 26–38). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tarnoff, J. (2011). STEM to STEAM—Recognizing the value of creative skills in the competitiveness debate. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-tarnoff/stem-to-steam-recognizing_b_756519.html?
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. (2006). Returning the aesthetic to the theatre/drama classroom. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment in arts education (pp. 3–26). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, E. C. (2006). Evolving modes of assessing dance: In search of transformative dance assessment. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment in arts education (pp. 3–26). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, P. (1990). Creativity as creative thinking. Music Educators Journal, 76(9), 22–28. doi:10.2307/3401073
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E., Davidson, L., & Scripp, L. (Eds.). (1992). Arts PROPEL: A handbook for music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero and Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2000a). The arts in education: Evaluating the evidence for a causal link. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3–4), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., & Hetland, L. ( Eds). (2000b). Mute those claims: No evidence (yet) for a causal link between arts study and academic achievement. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3–4), 11–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., & Martino, G. (2000). Giftedness in non-academic domains: The case of the visual arts and music. In K. Heller, F. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnick (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 95–110). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar